Does moving for family nest-building inhibit mothers' labour force (re-)entry?

<b>Background</b>: Couples tend to move house around first childbirth and often into suburban or rural neighbourhoods, conforming to the normative belief that children should grow up in a 'proper family home.' Such moves are likely to increase housing costs and both partners mi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefanie Kley, Sonja Drobnič
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research 2019-01-01
Series:Demographic Research
Online Access:https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol40/7/
_version_ 1817992528201252864
author Stefanie Kley
Sonja Drobnič
author_facet Stefanie Kley
Sonja Drobnič
author_sort Stefanie Kley
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background</b>: Couples tend to move house around first childbirth and often into suburban or rural neighbourhoods, conforming to the normative belief that children should grow up in a 'proper family home.' Such moves are likely to increase housing costs and both partners might need to contribute to the household income. But the move might also necessitate long commutes, inhibiting mothers' labour force participation. If the family sphere is more salient for (prospective) mothers, they might accept a remote location for its family-friendly environment but also because they are not planning a rapid return to work. <b>Objective</b>: This article analyses the influence of moving around first childbirth on the timing of mothers' transitions into employment after childbirth. <b>Methods</b>: Event history methods are used on longitudinal data from the German Socio-Economic Panel 1999-2014 (N = 1334 first-time mothers). <b>Results</b>: Limited evidence was found for the hypothesis that moving around first childbirth accelerates mothers' labour market (re-)entry: moving for homeownership increased the entry rate into full-time employment for mothers with low earnings potential. Strong evidence was found for the hypothesis that moving around first childbirth impedes mothers' employment, particularly hampering entering part-time jobs, the domain of working mothers in Germany and other countries. <b>Conclusions</b>: Moving for family nest-building seems to place mothers in unfavourable structural positions for employment. <b>Contribution</b>: This article shows that social inequalities among women and within households as well as the persistence of gendered life courses can be reinforced through processes of family migration.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T01:28:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-42ffd62849224bc6874a51a6b27bad70
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1435-9871
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T01:28:04Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
record_format Article
series Demographic Research
spelling doaj.art-42ffd62849224bc6874a51a6b27bad702022-12-22T02:20:20ZengMax Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchDemographic Research1435-98712019-01-0140710.4054/DemRes.2019.40.74088Does moving for family nest-building inhibit mothers' labour force (re-)entry?Stefanie Kley0Sonja Drobnič1Universit&#xe4;t HamburgUniversität Bremen<b>Background</b>: Couples tend to move house around first childbirth and often into suburban or rural neighbourhoods, conforming to the normative belief that children should grow up in a 'proper family home.' Such moves are likely to increase housing costs and both partners might need to contribute to the household income. But the move might also necessitate long commutes, inhibiting mothers' labour force participation. If the family sphere is more salient for (prospective) mothers, they might accept a remote location for its family-friendly environment but also because they are not planning a rapid return to work. <b>Objective</b>: This article analyses the influence of moving around first childbirth on the timing of mothers' transitions into employment after childbirth. <b>Methods</b>: Event history methods are used on longitudinal data from the German Socio-Economic Panel 1999-2014 (N = 1334 first-time mothers). <b>Results</b>: Limited evidence was found for the hypothesis that moving around first childbirth accelerates mothers' labour market (re-)entry: moving for homeownership increased the entry rate into full-time employment for mothers with low earnings potential. Strong evidence was found for the hypothesis that moving around first childbirth impedes mothers' employment, particularly hampering entering part-time jobs, the domain of working mothers in Germany and other countries. <b>Conclusions</b>: Moving for family nest-building seems to place mothers in unfavourable structural positions for employment. <b>Contribution</b>: This article shows that social inequalities among women and within households as well as the persistence of gendered life courses can be reinforced through processes of family migration.https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol40/7/
spellingShingle Stefanie Kley
Sonja Drobnič
Does moving for family nest-building inhibit mothers' labour force (re-)entry?
Demographic Research
title Does moving for family nest-building inhibit mothers' labour force (re-)entry?
title_full Does moving for family nest-building inhibit mothers' labour force (re-)entry?
title_fullStr Does moving for family nest-building inhibit mothers' labour force (re-)entry?
title_full_unstemmed Does moving for family nest-building inhibit mothers' labour force (re-)entry?
title_short Does moving for family nest-building inhibit mothers' labour force (re-)entry?
title_sort does moving for family nest building inhibit mothers labour force re entry
url https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol40/7/
work_keys_str_mv AT stefaniekley doesmovingforfamilynestbuildinginhibitmotherslabourforcereentry
AT sonjadrobnic doesmovingforfamilynestbuildinginhibitmotherslabourforcereentry