Sodium Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Metformin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes With Low Cardiovascular Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Background This study investigated whether initial SGLT2 (sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitor‐based treatment is superior to metformin‐based regimens as a primary prevention strategy among low‐risk patients with diabetes. Methods and Results In this nationwide cohort study, a total of 38 496 p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hao‐Chih Chang, Yun‐Yu Chen, Tzu‐Ting Kuo, Yenn‐Jiang Lin, Kuo‐Liong Chien, Hung‐Yu Chang, Chung‐Lieh Hung, Fa‐Po Chung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-04-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.123.032397
_version_ 1797205485137428480
author Hao‐Chih Chang
Yun‐Yu Chen
Tzu‐Ting Kuo
Yenn‐Jiang Lin
Kuo‐Liong Chien
Hung‐Yu Chang
Chung‐Lieh Hung
Fa‐Po Chung
author_facet Hao‐Chih Chang
Yun‐Yu Chen
Tzu‐Ting Kuo
Yenn‐Jiang Lin
Kuo‐Liong Chien
Hung‐Yu Chang
Chung‐Lieh Hung
Fa‐Po Chung
author_sort Hao‐Chih Chang
collection DOAJ
description Background This study investigated whether initial SGLT2 (sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitor‐based treatment is superior to metformin‐based regimens as a primary prevention strategy among low‐risk patients with diabetes. Methods and Results In this nationwide cohort study, a total of 38 496 patients with diabetes with low cardiovascular risk were identified (age 62.0±11.6 years, men 50%) from January 1 to December 31, 2016. Patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors‐based and metformin‐based regimens were 1:2 matched by propensity score. Study outcomes included all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, stroke, and progression to end‐stage renal disease. Compared with 1928 patients receiving metformin‐based regimens, 964 patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitor‐based regimens had similar all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.51–1.12]), cardiovascular death (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.25–1.89]), hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.59–1.92]), stroke (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.48–1.27]), and progression to end‐stage renal disease (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.32–2.39]). However, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of all‐cause mortality (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.23–0.99]; P for interaction=0.008) and progression to end‐stage renal disease (HR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.06–0.82]; P for interaction=0.04) in patients under the age of 65. Conclusions In comparison to metformin‐based regimens, SGLT2 inhibitor‐based regimens showed a similar risk of all‐cause mortality and adverse cardiorenal events. SGLT2 inhibitors might be considered as first‐line therapy in select low‐risk patients, for example, younger patients with diabetes.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:51:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4301bd88c7964ba5b51bc3499ae5594a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:51:52Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-4301bd88c7964ba5b51bc3499ae5594a2024-04-16T09:33:08ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802024-04-0113810.1161/JAHA.123.032397Sodium Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Metformin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes With Low Cardiovascular Risk: A Nationwide Cohort StudyHao‐Chih Chang0Yun‐Yu Chen1Tzu‐Ting Kuo2Yenn‐Jiang Lin3Kuo‐Liong Chien4Hung‐Yu Chang5Chung‐Lieh Hung6Fa‐Po Chung7Department of Medicine Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taoyuan Branch Taoyuan TaiwanCardiovascular Research Center, School of Medicine National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Taipei TaiwanDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei TaiwanCardiovascular Research Center, School of Medicine National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Taipei TaiwanInstitute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health National Taiwan University Taipei TaiwanHeart Center Cheng Hsin General Hospital Taipei TaiwanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine MacKay Memorial Hospital Taipei TaiwanCardiovascular Research Center, School of Medicine National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Taipei TaiwanBackground This study investigated whether initial SGLT2 (sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitor‐based treatment is superior to metformin‐based regimens as a primary prevention strategy among low‐risk patients with diabetes. Methods and Results In this nationwide cohort study, a total of 38 496 patients with diabetes with low cardiovascular risk were identified (age 62.0±11.6 years, men 50%) from January 1 to December 31, 2016. Patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors‐based and metformin‐based regimens were 1:2 matched by propensity score. Study outcomes included all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, stroke, and progression to end‐stage renal disease. Compared with 1928 patients receiving metformin‐based regimens, 964 patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitor‐based regimens had similar all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.51–1.12]), cardiovascular death (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.25–1.89]), hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.59–1.92]), stroke (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.48–1.27]), and progression to end‐stage renal disease (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.32–2.39]). However, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of all‐cause mortality (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.23–0.99]; P for interaction=0.008) and progression to end‐stage renal disease (HR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.06–0.82]; P for interaction=0.04) in patients under the age of 65. Conclusions In comparison to metformin‐based regimens, SGLT2 inhibitor‐based regimens showed a similar risk of all‐cause mortality and adverse cardiorenal events. SGLT2 inhibitors might be considered as first‐line therapy in select low‐risk patients, for example, younger patients with diabetes.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.123.032397low cardiovascular riskmetforminsodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitorstype 2 diabetes
spellingShingle Hao‐Chih Chang
Yun‐Yu Chen
Tzu‐Ting Kuo
Yenn‐Jiang Lin
Kuo‐Liong Chien
Hung‐Yu Chang
Chung‐Lieh Hung
Fa‐Po Chung
Sodium Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Metformin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes With Low Cardiovascular Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
low cardiovascular risk
metformin
sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors
type 2 diabetes
title Sodium Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Metformin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes With Low Cardiovascular Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study
title_full Sodium Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Metformin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes With Low Cardiovascular Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study
title_fullStr Sodium Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Metformin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes With Low Cardiovascular Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Sodium Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Metformin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes With Low Cardiovascular Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study
title_short Sodium Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors Versus Metformin on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes With Low Cardiovascular Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study
title_sort sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors versus metformin on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with diabetes with low cardiovascular risk a nationwide cohort study
topic low cardiovascular risk
metformin
sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors
type 2 diabetes
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.123.032397
work_keys_str_mv AT haochihchang sodiumglucosetransporter2inhibitorsversusmetforminoncardiovascularandrenaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeteswithlowcardiovascularriskanationwidecohortstudy
AT yunyuchen sodiumglucosetransporter2inhibitorsversusmetforminoncardiovascularandrenaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeteswithlowcardiovascularriskanationwidecohortstudy
AT tzutingkuo sodiumglucosetransporter2inhibitorsversusmetforminoncardiovascularandrenaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeteswithlowcardiovascularriskanationwidecohortstudy
AT yennjianglin sodiumglucosetransporter2inhibitorsversusmetforminoncardiovascularandrenaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeteswithlowcardiovascularriskanationwidecohortstudy
AT kuoliongchien sodiumglucosetransporter2inhibitorsversusmetforminoncardiovascularandrenaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeteswithlowcardiovascularriskanationwidecohortstudy
AT hungyuchang sodiumglucosetransporter2inhibitorsversusmetforminoncardiovascularandrenaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeteswithlowcardiovascularriskanationwidecohortstudy
AT chungliehhung sodiumglucosetransporter2inhibitorsversusmetforminoncardiovascularandrenaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeteswithlowcardiovascularriskanationwidecohortstudy
AT fapochung sodiumglucosetransporter2inhibitorsversusmetforminoncardiovascularandrenaloutcomesinpatientswithdiabeteswithlowcardiovascularriskanationwidecohortstudy