How Interpersonal Distance Between Avatar and Human Influences Facial Affect Recognition in Immersive Virtual Reality

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal interpersonal distance (IPD) between humans and affective avatars in facial affect recognition in immersive virtual reality (IVR). The ideal IPD is the one in which the humans show the highest number of hits and the shortest reaction ti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan del Aguila, Luz M. González-Gualda, María Angeles Játiva, Patricia Fernández-Sotos, Antonio Fernández-Caballero, Arturo S. García
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675515/full
_version_ 1818433491623215104
author Juan del Aguila
Luz M. González-Gualda
María Angeles Játiva
Patricia Fernández-Sotos
Patricia Fernández-Sotos
Antonio Fernández-Caballero
Antonio Fernández-Caballero
Antonio Fernández-Caballero
Arturo S. García
Arturo S. García
author_facet Juan del Aguila
Luz M. González-Gualda
María Angeles Játiva
Patricia Fernández-Sotos
Patricia Fernández-Sotos
Antonio Fernández-Caballero
Antonio Fernández-Caballero
Antonio Fernández-Caballero
Arturo S. García
Arturo S. García
author_sort Juan del Aguila
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal interpersonal distance (IPD) between humans and affective avatars in facial affect recognition in immersive virtual reality (IVR). The ideal IPD is the one in which the humans show the highest number of hits and the shortest reaction times in recognizing the emotions displayed by avatars. The results should help design future therapies to remedy facial affect recognition deficits.Methods: A group of 39 healthy volunteers participated in an experiment in which participants were shown 65 dynamic faces in IVR and had to identify six basic emotions plus neutral expression presented by the avatars. We decided to limit the experiment to five different distances: D1 (35 cm), D2 (55 cm), D3 (75 cm), D4 (95 cm), and D5 (115 cm), all belonging to the intimate and personal interpersonal spaces. Of the total of 65 faces, 13 faces were presented for each of the included distances. The views were shown at different angles: 50% in frontal view, 25% from the right profile, and 25% from the left profile. The order of appearance of the faces presented to each participant was randomized.Results: The overall success rate in facial emotion identification was 90.33%, being D3 the IPD with the best overall emotional recognition hits, although statistically significant differences could not be found between the IPDs. Consistent with results obtained in previous studies, identification rates for negative emotions were higher with increasing IPD, whereas the recognition task improved for positive emotions when IPD was closer. In addition, the study revealed irregular behavior in the facial detection of the emotion surprise.Conclusions: IVR allows us to reliably assess facial emotion recognition using dynamic avatars as all the IPDs tested showed to be effective. However, no statistically significant differences in facial emotion recognition were found among the different IPDs.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T16:21:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-430e75b60aff4592b2ac571470866427
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T16:21:57Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-430e75b60aff4592b2ac5714708664272022-12-21T22:54:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-07-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.675515675515How Interpersonal Distance Between Avatar and Human Influences Facial Affect Recognition in Immersive Virtual RealityJuan del Aguila0Luz M. González-Gualda1María Angeles Játiva2Patricia Fernández-Sotos3Patricia Fernández-Sotos4Antonio Fernández-Caballero5Antonio Fernández-Caballero6Antonio Fernández-Caballero7Arturo S. García8Arturo S. García9Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, SpainComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, SpainInstituto de Investigación en Informática de Albacete, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, SpainComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, SpainCIBERSAM (Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health), Madrid, SpainInstituto de Investigación en Informática de Albacete, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, SpainCIBERSAM (Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health), Madrid, SpainDepartamento de Sistemas Informáticos, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, SpainInstituto de Investigación en Informática de Albacete, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, SpainDepartamento de Sistemas Informáticos, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, SpainPurpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal interpersonal distance (IPD) between humans and affective avatars in facial affect recognition in immersive virtual reality (IVR). The ideal IPD is the one in which the humans show the highest number of hits and the shortest reaction times in recognizing the emotions displayed by avatars. The results should help design future therapies to remedy facial affect recognition deficits.Methods: A group of 39 healthy volunteers participated in an experiment in which participants were shown 65 dynamic faces in IVR and had to identify six basic emotions plus neutral expression presented by the avatars. We decided to limit the experiment to five different distances: D1 (35 cm), D2 (55 cm), D3 (75 cm), D4 (95 cm), and D5 (115 cm), all belonging to the intimate and personal interpersonal spaces. Of the total of 65 faces, 13 faces were presented for each of the included distances. The views were shown at different angles: 50% in frontal view, 25% from the right profile, and 25% from the left profile. The order of appearance of the faces presented to each participant was randomized.Results: The overall success rate in facial emotion identification was 90.33%, being D3 the IPD with the best overall emotional recognition hits, although statistically significant differences could not be found between the IPDs. Consistent with results obtained in previous studies, identification rates for negative emotions were higher with increasing IPD, whereas the recognition task improved for positive emotions when IPD was closer. In addition, the study revealed irregular behavior in the facial detection of the emotion surprise.Conclusions: IVR allows us to reliably assess facial emotion recognition using dynamic avatars as all the IPDs tested showed to be effective. However, no statistically significant differences in facial emotion recognition were found among the different IPDs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675515/fullvirtual realityfacial affect recognitioninterpersonal distanceemotion identificationreaction time
spellingShingle Juan del Aguila
Luz M. González-Gualda
María Angeles Játiva
Patricia Fernández-Sotos
Patricia Fernández-Sotos
Antonio Fernández-Caballero
Antonio Fernández-Caballero
Antonio Fernández-Caballero
Arturo S. García
Arturo S. García
How Interpersonal Distance Between Avatar and Human Influences Facial Affect Recognition in Immersive Virtual Reality
Frontiers in Psychology
virtual reality
facial affect recognition
interpersonal distance
emotion identification
reaction time
title How Interpersonal Distance Between Avatar and Human Influences Facial Affect Recognition in Immersive Virtual Reality
title_full How Interpersonal Distance Between Avatar and Human Influences Facial Affect Recognition in Immersive Virtual Reality
title_fullStr How Interpersonal Distance Between Avatar and Human Influences Facial Affect Recognition in Immersive Virtual Reality
title_full_unstemmed How Interpersonal Distance Between Avatar and Human Influences Facial Affect Recognition in Immersive Virtual Reality
title_short How Interpersonal Distance Between Avatar and Human Influences Facial Affect Recognition in Immersive Virtual Reality
title_sort how interpersonal distance between avatar and human influences facial affect recognition in immersive virtual reality
topic virtual reality
facial affect recognition
interpersonal distance
emotion identification
reaction time
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675515/full
work_keys_str_mv AT juandelaguila howinterpersonaldistancebetweenavatarandhumaninfluencesfacialaffectrecognitioninimmersivevirtualreality
AT luzmgonzalezgualda howinterpersonaldistancebetweenavatarandhumaninfluencesfacialaffectrecognitioninimmersivevirtualreality
AT mariaangelesjativa howinterpersonaldistancebetweenavatarandhumaninfluencesfacialaffectrecognitioninimmersivevirtualreality
AT patriciafernandezsotos howinterpersonaldistancebetweenavatarandhumaninfluencesfacialaffectrecognitioninimmersivevirtualreality
AT patriciafernandezsotos howinterpersonaldistancebetweenavatarandhumaninfluencesfacialaffectrecognitioninimmersivevirtualreality
AT antoniofernandezcaballero howinterpersonaldistancebetweenavatarandhumaninfluencesfacialaffectrecognitioninimmersivevirtualreality
AT antoniofernandezcaballero howinterpersonaldistancebetweenavatarandhumaninfluencesfacialaffectrecognitioninimmersivevirtualreality
AT antoniofernandezcaballero howinterpersonaldistancebetweenavatarandhumaninfluencesfacialaffectrecognitioninimmersivevirtualreality
AT arturosgarcia howinterpersonaldistancebetweenavatarandhumaninfluencesfacialaffectrecognitioninimmersivevirtualreality
AT arturosgarcia howinterpersonaldistancebetweenavatarandhumaninfluencesfacialaffectrecognitioninimmersivevirtualreality