Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three different materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth: An In Vitro study
Aim: To compare the sealing ability of three different materials when used as postendodontic restoration barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth. Materials and Methods: In the present study, 60 single-rooted mandibular premolars with single canals were selected. After endodontic treatm...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=659;epage=662;aulast=Jain |
| _version_ | 1797222307712729088 |
|---|---|
| author | Mahima S Jain Mukesh Paliwal Manish Sundesha Sultan Abdulrahman Almalki AlBandary H Al Jameel Inderjit M Gowdar Sugandha Arya |
| author_facet | Mahima S Jain Mukesh Paliwal Manish Sundesha Sultan Abdulrahman Almalki AlBandary H Al Jameel Inderjit M Gowdar Sugandha Arya |
| author_sort | Mahima S Jain |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim: To compare the sealing ability of three different materials when used as postendodontic restoration barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth. Materials and Methods: In the present study, 60 single-rooted mandibular premolars with single canals were selected. After endodontic treatment was done with protaper files, they were divided into three groups of 20 teeth each, which were restored with Zirconomer (Group I), Hi-Dense (Group II), and Surefil composite (Group III), respectively. After storing in artificial saliva for 10 days, all teeth were then immersed in Rhodamine 6G fluorescent dye. Teeth were then sectioned buccolingually in a longitudinal direction. The coronal microleakage was measured in both halves under a fluorescence microscope and images were taken with a digital camera. Data obtained from the study in the form of scoring as per specific criteria was subjected to statistical analysis. Result: Results of the study showed that the minimum amount of coronal microleakage was seen in Group II restored with Hi-Dense followed by Group III restored with Surefil Composite and the maximum amount of coronal microleakage was seen in Group I restored with Zirconomer. Conclusion: On the basis of the results of the present study, it may be concluded that Hi-Dense showed better coronal sealing ability in access cavities. Surefil composite exhibited coronal microleakage less than Zirconomer but more than Hi-Dense. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:19:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-431c3a6592ee46f88905ddca2ec75b2d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:19:15Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-431c3a6592ee46f88905ddca2ec75b2d2024-04-04T16:37:40ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062024-01-0116565966210.4103/jpbs.jpbs_921_23Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three different materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth: An In Vitro studyMahima S JainMukesh PaliwalManish SundeshaSultan Abdulrahman AlmalkiAlBandary H Al JameelInderjit M GowdarSugandha AryaAim: To compare the sealing ability of three different materials when used as postendodontic restoration barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth. Materials and Methods: In the present study, 60 single-rooted mandibular premolars with single canals were selected. After endodontic treatment was done with protaper files, they were divided into three groups of 20 teeth each, which were restored with Zirconomer (Group I), Hi-Dense (Group II), and Surefil composite (Group III), respectively. After storing in artificial saliva for 10 days, all teeth were then immersed in Rhodamine 6G fluorescent dye. Teeth were then sectioned buccolingually in a longitudinal direction. The coronal microleakage was measured in both halves under a fluorescence microscope and images were taken with a digital camera. Data obtained from the study in the form of scoring as per specific criteria was subjected to statistical analysis. Result: Results of the study showed that the minimum amount of coronal microleakage was seen in Group II restored with Hi-Dense followed by Group III restored with Surefil Composite and the maximum amount of coronal microleakage was seen in Group I restored with Zirconomer. Conclusion: On the basis of the results of the present study, it may be concluded that Hi-Dense showed better coronal sealing ability in access cavities. Surefil composite exhibited coronal microleakage less than Zirconomer but more than Hi-Dense.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=659;epage=662;aulast=Jainah-plushi-densesurefil compositezirconomer |
| spellingShingle | Mahima S Jain Mukesh Paliwal Manish Sundesha Sultan Abdulrahman Almalki AlBandary H Al Jameel Inderjit M Gowdar Sugandha Arya Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three different materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth: An In Vitro study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences ah-plus hi-dense surefil composite zirconomer |
| title | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three different materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth: An In Vitro study |
| title_full | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three different materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth: An In Vitro study |
| title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three different materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth: An In Vitro study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three different materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth: An In Vitro study |
| title_short | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three different materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth: An In Vitro study |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three different materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root filled teeth an in vitro study |
| topic | ah-plus hi-dense surefil composite zirconomer |
| url | http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2024;volume=16;issue=5;spage=659;epage=662;aulast=Jain |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mahimasjain comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofthreedifferentmaterialsasbarrierstocoronalmicroleakageinrootfilledteethaninvitrostudy AT mukeshpaliwal comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofthreedifferentmaterialsasbarrierstocoronalmicroleakageinrootfilledteethaninvitrostudy AT manishsundesha comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofthreedifferentmaterialsasbarrierstocoronalmicroleakageinrootfilledteethaninvitrostudy AT sultanabdulrahmanalmalki comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofthreedifferentmaterialsasbarrierstocoronalmicroleakageinrootfilledteethaninvitrostudy AT albandaryhaljameel comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofthreedifferentmaterialsasbarrierstocoronalmicroleakageinrootfilledteethaninvitrostudy AT inderjitmgowdar comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofthreedifferentmaterialsasbarrierstocoronalmicroleakageinrootfilledteethaninvitrostudy AT sugandhaarya comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityofthreedifferentmaterialsasbarrierstocoronalmicroleakageinrootfilledteethaninvitrostudy |