Communicating Eco-Friendly Benefits: Why Accidental Improvements May Be Better Received by Consumers
Doing good does not necessarily imply doing well for a company. Ironically, in the case of green products it can even be quite the contrary. Deliberately enhancing a product with environmental benefits to make it more appealing may actually lead to a decrease in consumer interest because consumers s...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2016-05-01
|
| Series: | GfK Marketing Intelligence Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/gfkmir.2016.8.issue-1/gfkmir-2016-0007/gfkmir-2016-0007.xml?format=INT |
| _version_ | 1818266245807472640 |
|---|---|
| author | Newman George E. Dhar Ravi Gorlin Margarita |
| author_facet | Newman George E. Dhar Ravi Gorlin Margarita |
| author_sort | Newman George E. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Doing good does not necessarily imply doing well for a company. Ironically, in the case of green products it can even be quite the contrary. Deliberately enhancing a product with environmental benefits to make it more appealing may actually lead to a decrease in consumer interest because consumers suspect that quality was reduced on other dimensions. Even explicitly stating that the company cares about both the environment and quality is not sufficient to overcome consumers’ skepticism, according to our experiments. Fortunately, there are ways to communicate environmental improvements successfully. Companies improving a basic product feature like making something more eco-friendly should either position the improvement as unintended or emphasize that the primary goal is improving the quality of the product. Focusing on eco-conscious market segments also helps to avoid harm and might even be beneficial. Improvements on dimensions that are not inherent to a product’s composition, like fair trade or other social benefits, turned out to be less critical in the experiments. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T20:03:38Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-431e9ea41c124dda9472e932065d0713 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1865-5866 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T20:03:38Z |
| publishDate | 2016-05-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | GfK Marketing Intelligence Review |
| spelling | doaj.art-431e9ea41c124dda9472e932065d07132022-12-22T00:13:42ZengSciendoGfK Marketing Intelligence Review1865-58662016-05-0181424510.1515/gfkmir-2016-0007gfkmir-2016-0007Communicating Eco-Friendly Benefits: Why Accidental Improvements May Be Better Received by ConsumersNewman George E.0Dhar Ravi1Gorlin Margarita2Professor of Organizational Behavior, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USAGeorge Rogers Clark Professor of Management and Marketing, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USAPhD candidate at the Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USADoing good does not necessarily imply doing well for a company. Ironically, in the case of green products it can even be quite the contrary. Deliberately enhancing a product with environmental benefits to make it more appealing may actually lead to a decrease in consumer interest because consumers suspect that quality was reduced on other dimensions. Even explicitly stating that the company cares about both the environment and quality is not sufficient to overcome consumers’ skepticism, according to our experiments. Fortunately, there are ways to communicate environmental improvements successfully. Companies improving a basic product feature like making something more eco-friendly should either position the improvement as unintended or emphasize that the primary goal is improving the quality of the product. Focusing on eco-conscious market segments also helps to avoid harm and might even be beneficial. Improvements on dimensions that are not inherent to a product’s composition, like fair trade or other social benefits, turned out to be less critical in the experiments.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/gfkmir.2016.8.issue-1/gfkmir-2016-0007/gfkmir-2016-0007.xml?format=INTGreen ProductsGreen Product EvaluationsProduct AttributesProduct QualityCommunication |
| spellingShingle | Newman George E. Dhar Ravi Gorlin Margarita Communicating Eco-Friendly Benefits: Why Accidental Improvements May Be Better Received by Consumers GfK Marketing Intelligence Review Green Products Green Product Evaluations Product Attributes Product Quality Communication |
| title | Communicating Eco-Friendly Benefits: Why Accidental Improvements May Be Better Received by Consumers |
| title_full | Communicating Eco-Friendly Benefits: Why Accidental Improvements May Be Better Received by Consumers |
| title_fullStr | Communicating Eco-Friendly Benefits: Why Accidental Improvements May Be Better Received by Consumers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Communicating Eco-Friendly Benefits: Why Accidental Improvements May Be Better Received by Consumers |
| title_short | Communicating Eco-Friendly Benefits: Why Accidental Improvements May Be Better Received by Consumers |
| title_sort | communicating eco friendly benefits why accidental improvements may be better received by consumers |
| topic | Green Products Green Product Evaluations Product Attributes Product Quality Communication |
| url | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/gfkmir.2016.8.issue-1/gfkmir-2016-0007/gfkmir-2016-0007.xml?format=INT |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT newmangeorgee communicatingecofriendlybenefitswhyaccidentalimprovementsmaybebetterreceivedbyconsumers AT dharravi communicatingecofriendlybenefitswhyaccidentalimprovementsmaybebetterreceivedbyconsumers AT gorlinmargarita communicatingecofriendlybenefitswhyaccidentalimprovementsmaybebetterreceivedbyconsumers |