Machine learning-enabled regional multi-hazards risk assessment considering social vulnerability

Abstract The regional multi-hazards risk assessment poses difficulties due to data access challenges, and the potential interactions between multi-hazards and social vulnerability. For better natural hazards risk perception and preparedness, it is important to study the nature-hazards risk distribut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tianjie Zhang, Donglei Wang, Yang Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40159-9
_version_ 1797452961791606784
author Tianjie Zhang
Donglei Wang
Yang Lu
author_facet Tianjie Zhang
Donglei Wang
Yang Lu
author_sort Tianjie Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The regional multi-hazards risk assessment poses difficulties due to data access challenges, and the potential interactions between multi-hazards and social vulnerability. For better natural hazards risk perception and preparedness, it is important to study the nature-hazards risk distribution in different areas, specifically a major priority in the areas of high hazards level and social vulnerability. We propose a multi-hazards risk assessment method which considers social vulnerability into the analyzing and utilize machine learning-enabled models to solve this issue. The proposed methodology integrates three aspects as follows: (1) characterization and mapping of multi-hazards (Flooding, Wildfires, and Seismic) using five machine learning methods including Naïve Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and K-Means (KM); (2) evaluation of social vulnerability with a composite index tailored for the case-study area and using machine learning models for classification; (3) risk-based quantification of spatial interaction mechanisms between multi-hazards and social vulnerability. The results indicate that RF model performs best in both hazard-related and social vulnerability datasets. The most cities at multi-hazards risk account for 34.12% of total studied cities (covering 20.80% land). Additionally, high multi-hazards level and socially vulnerable cities account for 15.88% (covering 4.92% land). This study generates a multi-hazards risk map which show a wide variety of spatial patterns and a corresponding understanding of where regional high hazards potential and vulnerable areas are. It emphasizes an urgent need to implement information-based prioritization when natural hazards coming, and effective policy measures for reducing natural-hazards risks in future.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:16:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-432e61a13e424453b4978c177cbfd6c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:16:25Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-432e61a13e424453b4978c177cbfd6c02023-11-26T13:04:31ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-08-0113111410.1038/s41598-023-40159-9Machine learning-enabled regional multi-hazards risk assessment considering social vulnerabilityTianjie Zhang0Donglei Wang1Yang Lu2Environmental Research Building, Department of Computer Science, Boise State UniversityEnvironmental Research Building, Department of Civil Engineering, Boise State UniversityBoise State UniversityAbstract The regional multi-hazards risk assessment poses difficulties due to data access challenges, and the potential interactions between multi-hazards and social vulnerability. For better natural hazards risk perception and preparedness, it is important to study the nature-hazards risk distribution in different areas, specifically a major priority in the areas of high hazards level and social vulnerability. We propose a multi-hazards risk assessment method which considers social vulnerability into the analyzing and utilize machine learning-enabled models to solve this issue. The proposed methodology integrates three aspects as follows: (1) characterization and mapping of multi-hazards (Flooding, Wildfires, and Seismic) using five machine learning methods including Naïve Bayes (NB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and K-Means (KM); (2) evaluation of social vulnerability with a composite index tailored for the case-study area and using machine learning models for classification; (3) risk-based quantification of spatial interaction mechanisms between multi-hazards and social vulnerability. The results indicate that RF model performs best in both hazard-related and social vulnerability datasets. The most cities at multi-hazards risk account for 34.12% of total studied cities (covering 20.80% land). Additionally, high multi-hazards level and socially vulnerable cities account for 15.88% (covering 4.92% land). This study generates a multi-hazards risk map which show a wide variety of spatial patterns and a corresponding understanding of where regional high hazards potential and vulnerable areas are. It emphasizes an urgent need to implement information-based prioritization when natural hazards coming, and effective policy measures for reducing natural-hazards risks in future.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40159-9
spellingShingle Tianjie Zhang
Donglei Wang
Yang Lu
Machine learning-enabled regional multi-hazards risk assessment considering social vulnerability
Scientific Reports
title Machine learning-enabled regional multi-hazards risk assessment considering social vulnerability
title_full Machine learning-enabled regional multi-hazards risk assessment considering social vulnerability
title_fullStr Machine learning-enabled regional multi-hazards risk assessment considering social vulnerability
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning-enabled regional multi-hazards risk assessment considering social vulnerability
title_short Machine learning-enabled regional multi-hazards risk assessment considering social vulnerability
title_sort machine learning enabled regional multi hazards risk assessment considering social vulnerability
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40159-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tianjiezhang machinelearningenabledregionalmultihazardsriskassessmentconsideringsocialvulnerability
AT dongleiwang machinelearningenabledregionalmultihazardsriskassessmentconsideringsocialvulnerability
AT yanglu machinelearningenabledregionalmultihazardsriskassessmentconsideringsocialvulnerability