Closure of Transsplenic Access Tracts Using Tract Embolics: Success, Clinical Outcomes, and Complications in a Tertiary Center

Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transsplenic venous access closure. Materials and Methods Twenty patients (mean age: 51.8 years; range: 28–72), underwent 21 transsplenic venous access procedures over 4 years in this retrospective study. Comorbi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Rigual, Isaac Chen, Dustin L. Roberts, James Sayre, Ravi Srinivasa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2023-04-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-1743499
_version_ 1811172255963545600
author David Rigual
Isaac Chen
Dustin L. Roberts
James Sayre
Ravi Srinivasa
author_facet David Rigual
Isaac Chen
Dustin L. Roberts
James Sayre
Ravi Srinivasa
author_sort David Rigual
collection DOAJ
description Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transsplenic venous access closure. Materials and Methods Twenty patients (mean age: 51.8 years; range: 28–72), underwent 21 transsplenic venous access procedures over 4 years in this retrospective study. Comorbidities, active hemorrhage, anticoagulation, coagulation parameters, platelets, indications for transsplenic access, needle gauge, sheath size, variceal embolization method, tract embolization method, bleeding complications, and transfusion requirements and additional procedures to manage bleeding complications were recorded. Results Preprocedure comorbidities included portal hypertension (n = 18/20, 90%), portal vein thrombosis (n = 14/20, 70%), hemorrhage (n = 6/20, 30%), splenic vein thrombosis (n = 7/20, 35%), anticoagulation (n = 2/20, 10%), and sinistral portal hypertension (n = 2/20,10%). Mean baseline international normalized ratio was 1.3 (range: 1–1.9), platelets 122 (range: 18–492). Most common transsplenic access indications were gastric varices with nonpatent portosystemic shunt (n = 11/21, 52%) and portal vein targeting for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (n = 8, 38%). Most common access sheath sizes were 4-French (n = 5, 24%) and 6-French (n = 6, 29%). Fifteen procedures (71%) involved variceal embolization. Transsplenic tracts were embolized with microfibrillar collagen alone (n = 7), coils and microfibrillar collagen (n = 8), or others (n = 6). Based on the Society of Interventional Radiology adverse event classification system, embolization complications included one major (splenic artery pseudoaneurysm and a splenic vein pseudoaneurysm) and three moderate (19%) adverse bleeding events, which required blood transfusion. Conclusion Transsplenic venous access tract embolization is a safe and moderately effective method to achieve tract hemostasis, with an overall clinical failure rate of 20%.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:26:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-432ebaebae3e435a8d514ee9dcbd734a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2456-4869
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:26:51Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR
spelling doaj.art-432ebaebae3e435a8d514ee9dcbd734a2023-02-04T00:46:07ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR2456-48692023-04-01070100801410.1055/s-0042-1743499Closure of Transsplenic Access Tracts Using Tract Embolics: Success, Clinical Outcomes, and Complications in a Tertiary CenterDavid Rigual0Isaac Chen1Dustin L. Roberts2James Sayre3Ravi Srinivasa4Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, UCLA, Ronald Reagan Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United StatesCalifornia Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, California, United StatesDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, UCLA, Ronald Reagan Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United StatesDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, UCLA, Ronald Reagan Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United StatesDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, UCLA, Ronald Reagan Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United StatesPurpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transsplenic venous access closure. Materials and Methods Twenty patients (mean age: 51.8 years; range: 28–72), underwent 21 transsplenic venous access procedures over 4 years in this retrospective study. Comorbidities, active hemorrhage, anticoagulation, coagulation parameters, platelets, indications for transsplenic access, needle gauge, sheath size, variceal embolization method, tract embolization method, bleeding complications, and transfusion requirements and additional procedures to manage bleeding complications were recorded. Results Preprocedure comorbidities included portal hypertension (n = 18/20, 90%), portal vein thrombosis (n = 14/20, 70%), hemorrhage (n = 6/20, 30%), splenic vein thrombosis (n = 7/20, 35%), anticoagulation (n = 2/20, 10%), and sinistral portal hypertension (n = 2/20,10%). Mean baseline international normalized ratio was 1.3 (range: 1–1.9), platelets 122 (range: 18–492). Most common transsplenic access indications were gastric varices with nonpatent portosystemic shunt (n = 11/21, 52%) and portal vein targeting for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (n = 8, 38%). Most common access sheath sizes were 4-French (n = 5, 24%) and 6-French (n = 6, 29%). Fifteen procedures (71%) involved variceal embolization. Transsplenic tracts were embolized with microfibrillar collagen alone (n = 7), coils and microfibrillar collagen (n = 8), or others (n = 6). Based on the Society of Interventional Radiology adverse event classification system, embolization complications included one major (splenic artery pseudoaneurysm and a splenic vein pseudoaneurysm) and three moderate (19%) adverse bleeding events, which required blood transfusion. Conclusion Transsplenic venous access tract embolization is a safe and moderately effective method to achieve tract hemostasis, with an overall clinical failure rate of 20%.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-1743499transsplenic accessmicrofibrillar collagenhemostasis
spellingShingle David Rigual
Isaac Chen
Dustin L. Roberts
James Sayre
Ravi Srinivasa
Closure of Transsplenic Access Tracts Using Tract Embolics: Success, Clinical Outcomes, and Complications in a Tertiary Center
Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR
transsplenic access
microfibrillar collagen
hemostasis
title Closure of Transsplenic Access Tracts Using Tract Embolics: Success, Clinical Outcomes, and Complications in a Tertiary Center
title_full Closure of Transsplenic Access Tracts Using Tract Embolics: Success, Clinical Outcomes, and Complications in a Tertiary Center
title_fullStr Closure of Transsplenic Access Tracts Using Tract Embolics: Success, Clinical Outcomes, and Complications in a Tertiary Center
title_full_unstemmed Closure of Transsplenic Access Tracts Using Tract Embolics: Success, Clinical Outcomes, and Complications in a Tertiary Center
title_short Closure of Transsplenic Access Tracts Using Tract Embolics: Success, Clinical Outcomes, and Complications in a Tertiary Center
title_sort closure of transsplenic access tracts using tract embolics success clinical outcomes and complications in a tertiary center
topic transsplenic access
microfibrillar collagen
hemostasis
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0042-1743499
work_keys_str_mv AT davidrigual closureoftranssplenicaccesstractsusingtractembolicssuccessclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsinatertiarycenter
AT isaacchen closureoftranssplenicaccesstractsusingtractembolicssuccessclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsinatertiarycenter
AT dustinlroberts closureoftranssplenicaccesstractsusingtractembolicssuccessclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsinatertiarycenter
AT jamessayre closureoftranssplenicaccesstractsusingtractembolicssuccessclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsinatertiarycenter
AT ravisrinivasa closureoftranssplenicaccesstractsusingtractembolicssuccessclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsinatertiarycenter