Should Cystatin C eGFR Become Routine Clinical Practice?

Kidney function assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing kidney diseases. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is widely used as an indicator of kidney function, but its direct measurement is challenging. Serum creatinine, a commonly used marker for estimating GFR (eGFR), has limitations in acc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Spencer, Robert Desborough, Sunil Bhandari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-07-01
Series:Biomolecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/13/7/1075
_version_ 1827733668739678208
author Sebastian Spencer
Robert Desborough
Sunil Bhandari
author_facet Sebastian Spencer
Robert Desborough
Sunil Bhandari
author_sort Sebastian Spencer
collection DOAJ
description Kidney function assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing kidney diseases. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is widely used as an indicator of kidney function, but its direct measurement is challenging. Serum creatinine, a commonly used marker for estimating GFR (eGFR), has limitations in accuracy and sensitivity. Cystatin C, a protein freely filtered by the glomerulus, has emerged as a promising alternative marker for kidney function. It is unaffected by muscle mass and shows stronger associations with cardiovascular disease and mortality than creatinine. Various equations have been developed to estimate GFR using creatinine or cystatin C alone or in combination. The CKD-EPI<sub>creat-cys</sub> equation combining both markers demonstrates improved accuracy in GFR estimation, especially for individuals with eGFR values of 45–59 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. Cystatin C-based estimates of GFR outperform creatinine-based estimates in predicting clinical outcomes and identifying patients at higher risk, particularly in elderly and non-white ethnic groups. Cystatin C offers advantages over creatinine as a marker of kidney function. It is not influenced by non-kidney factors and provides more accurate estimation of GFR, aiding in the early detection of kidney disease and predicting adverse outcomes. Incorporating cystatin C into routine kidney function assessment may improve patient risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making. However, widespread adoption of cystatin C testing requires increased availability and accessibility in clinical laboratories. Further research and implementation efforts are needed to fully realize the potential of cystatin C in kidney function assessment and improving patient outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:15:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-43351b87f5674995af0ce5bb4fe70814
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2218-273X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:15:25Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Biomolecules
spelling doaj.art-43351b87f5674995af0ce5bb4fe708142023-11-18T18:31:04ZengMDPI AGBiomolecules2218-273X2023-07-01137107510.3390/biom13071075Should Cystatin C eGFR Become Routine Clinical Practice?Sebastian Spencer0Robert Desborough1Sunil Bhandari2School of Medical Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UKHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RU, UKHull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RU, UKKidney function assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing kidney diseases. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is widely used as an indicator of kidney function, but its direct measurement is challenging. Serum creatinine, a commonly used marker for estimating GFR (eGFR), has limitations in accuracy and sensitivity. Cystatin C, a protein freely filtered by the glomerulus, has emerged as a promising alternative marker for kidney function. It is unaffected by muscle mass and shows stronger associations with cardiovascular disease and mortality than creatinine. Various equations have been developed to estimate GFR using creatinine or cystatin C alone or in combination. The CKD-EPI<sub>creat-cys</sub> equation combining both markers demonstrates improved accuracy in GFR estimation, especially for individuals with eGFR values of 45–59 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. Cystatin C-based estimates of GFR outperform creatinine-based estimates in predicting clinical outcomes and identifying patients at higher risk, particularly in elderly and non-white ethnic groups. Cystatin C offers advantages over creatinine as a marker of kidney function. It is not influenced by non-kidney factors and provides more accurate estimation of GFR, aiding in the early detection of kidney disease and predicting adverse outcomes. Incorporating cystatin C into routine kidney function assessment may improve patient risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making. However, widespread adoption of cystatin C testing requires increased availability and accessibility in clinical laboratories. Further research and implementation efforts are needed to fully realize the potential of cystatin C in kidney function assessment and improving patient outcomes.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/13/7/1075chronic kidney diseasecardiovascular diseasecystatin CGFR
spellingShingle Sebastian Spencer
Robert Desborough
Sunil Bhandari
Should Cystatin C eGFR Become Routine Clinical Practice?
Biomolecules
chronic kidney disease
cardiovascular disease
cystatin C
GFR
title Should Cystatin C eGFR Become Routine Clinical Practice?
title_full Should Cystatin C eGFR Become Routine Clinical Practice?
title_fullStr Should Cystatin C eGFR Become Routine Clinical Practice?
title_full_unstemmed Should Cystatin C eGFR Become Routine Clinical Practice?
title_short Should Cystatin C eGFR Become Routine Clinical Practice?
title_sort should cystatin c egfr become routine clinical practice
topic chronic kidney disease
cardiovascular disease
cystatin C
GFR
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/13/7/1075
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianspencer shouldcystatincegfrbecomeroutineclinicalpractice
AT robertdesborough shouldcystatincegfrbecomeroutineclinicalpractice
AT sunilbhandari shouldcystatincegfrbecomeroutineclinicalpractice