Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability

Several studies have demonstrated that individuals’ ability to perceive a speech sound contrast is related to the production of that contrast in their native language. The theoretical account for this relationship is that speech perception and production have a shared multimodal representation in re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hung-Shao Cheng, Caroline A. Niziolek, Adam Buchwald, Tara McAllister
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2021.660948/full
_version_ 1818646928437542912
author Hung-Shao Cheng
Caroline A. Niziolek
Adam Buchwald
Tara McAllister
author_facet Hung-Shao Cheng
Caroline A. Niziolek
Adam Buchwald
Tara McAllister
author_sort Hung-Shao Cheng
collection DOAJ
description Several studies have demonstrated that individuals’ ability to perceive a speech sound contrast is related to the production of that contrast in their native language. The theoretical account for this relationship is that speech perception and production have a shared multimodal representation in relevant sensory spaces (e.g., auditory and somatosensory domains). This gives rise to a prediction that individuals with more narrowly defined targets will produce greater separation between contrasting sounds, as well as lower variability in the production of each sound. However, empirical studies that tested this hypothesis, particularly with regard to variability, have reported mixed outcomes. The current study investigates the relationship between perceptual ability and production ability, focusing on the auditory domain. We examined whether individuals’ categorical labeling consistency for the American English /ε/–/æ/ contrast, measured using a perceptual identification task, is related to distance between the centroids of vowel categories in acoustic space (i.e., vowel contrast distance) and to two measures of production variability: the overall distribution of repeated tokens for the vowels (i.e., area of the ellipse) and the proportional within-trial decrease in variability as defined as the magnitude of self-correction to the initial acoustic variation of each token (i.e., centering ratio). No significant associations were found between categorical labeling consistency and vowel contrast distance, between categorical labeling consistency and area of the ellipse, or between categorical labeling consistency and centering ratio. These null results suggest that the perception-production relation may not be as robust as suggested by a widely adopted theoretical framing in terms of the size of auditory target regions. However, the present results may also be attributable to choices in implementation (e.g., the use of model talkers instead of continua derived from the participants’ own productions) that should be subject to further investigation.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T00:54:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-433f12336fe040fbb6287872b4d5af5c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T00:54:26Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-433f12336fe040fbb6287872b4d5af5c2022-12-21T22:09:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612021-05-011510.3389/fnhum.2021.660948660948Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production VariabilityHung-Shao Cheng0Caroline A. Niziolek1Adam Buchwald2Tara McAllister3Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York City, NY, United StatesDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United StatesDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York City, NY, United StatesDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, New York City, NY, United StatesSeveral studies have demonstrated that individuals’ ability to perceive a speech sound contrast is related to the production of that contrast in their native language. The theoretical account for this relationship is that speech perception and production have a shared multimodal representation in relevant sensory spaces (e.g., auditory and somatosensory domains). This gives rise to a prediction that individuals with more narrowly defined targets will produce greater separation between contrasting sounds, as well as lower variability in the production of each sound. However, empirical studies that tested this hypothesis, particularly with regard to variability, have reported mixed outcomes. The current study investigates the relationship between perceptual ability and production ability, focusing on the auditory domain. We examined whether individuals’ categorical labeling consistency for the American English /ε/–/æ/ contrast, measured using a perceptual identification task, is related to distance between the centroids of vowel categories in acoustic space (i.e., vowel contrast distance) and to two measures of production variability: the overall distribution of repeated tokens for the vowels (i.e., area of the ellipse) and the proportional within-trial decrease in variability as defined as the magnitude of self-correction to the initial acoustic variation of each token (i.e., centering ratio). No significant associations were found between categorical labeling consistency and vowel contrast distance, between categorical labeling consistency and area of the ellipse, or between categorical labeling consistency and centering ratio. These null results suggest that the perception-production relation may not be as robust as suggested by a widely adopted theoretical framing in terms of the size of auditory target regions. However, the present results may also be attributable to choices in implementation (e.g., the use of model talkers instead of continua derived from the participants’ own productions) that should be subject to further investigation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2021.660948/fullspeech perceptionspeech productionproduction variabilityspeech motor controlindividual differences
spellingShingle Hung-Shao Cheng
Caroline A. Niziolek
Adam Buchwald
Tara McAllister
Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
speech perception
speech production
production variability
speech motor control
individual differences
title Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability
title_full Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability
title_fullStr Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability
title_full_unstemmed Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability
title_short Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability
title_sort examining the relationship between speech perception production distinctness and production variability
topic speech perception
speech production
production variability
speech motor control
individual differences
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2021.660948/full
work_keys_str_mv AT hungshaocheng examiningtherelationshipbetweenspeechperceptionproductiondistinctnessandproductionvariability
AT carolineaniziolek examiningtherelationshipbetweenspeechperceptionproductiondistinctnessandproductionvariability
AT adambuchwald examiningtherelationshipbetweenspeechperceptionproductiondistinctnessandproductionvariability
AT taramcallister examiningtherelationshipbetweenspeechperceptionproductiondistinctnessandproductionvariability