Decision support for aquatic restoration based on species‐specific responses to disturbance
Abstract Disturbances to aquatic habitats are not uniformly distributed within the Great Lakes and acute effects can be strongest in nearshore areas where both landscape and within lake effects can have strong influence. Furthermore, different fish species respond to disturbances in different ways....
Main Authors: | James E. McKenna Jr., Catherine Riseng, Kevin Wehrly |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9313 |
Similar Items
-
Habitat characterization and species distribution model of the only large‐lake population of the endangered Silver Chub (Macrhybopsis storeriana, Kirtland 1844)
by: James E. McKenna Jr., et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Environmental DNA reveals anadromous river herring habitat use and recolonization after restoration of aquatic connectivity
by: Matthew B. Ogburn, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Geomorphological development of aquatic mesohabitats in shore channels along longitudinal training dams
by: Natasha Y. Flores, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Connections among Land Use, Water Quality, Biodiversity of Aquatic Invertebrates, and Fish Behavior in Amazon Rivers
by: Rodrigo Silva de Sousa, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01) -
On the troubling use of plastic ‘habitat’ structures for fish in freshwater ecosystems – or – when restoration is just littering
by: S.J. Cooke, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)