Peripheral vs. central sex steroid hormones in experimental Parkinson’s disease

The nigrostriatal dopaminergic (NSDA) pathway degenerates in Parkinson’s disease (PD), which occurs with approximately twice the incidence in men than women. Studies of the influence of systemic estrogens in females suggest sex hormones contribute to these differences. In this review we analyse the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon eMcArthur, Glenda E Gillies
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2011-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Endocrinology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2011.00082/full
_version_ 1818179010139521024
author Simon eMcArthur
Glenda E Gillies
author_facet Simon eMcArthur
Glenda E Gillies
author_sort Simon eMcArthur
collection DOAJ
description The nigrostriatal dopaminergic (NSDA) pathway degenerates in Parkinson’s disease (PD), which occurs with approximately twice the incidence in men than women. Studies of the influence of systemic estrogens in females suggest sex hormones contribute to these differences. In this review we analyse the evidence revealing great complexity in the response of the healthy and injured NSDA system to hormonal influences, and emphasize the importance of centrally generated estrogens. At physiological levels, circulating estrogen (in females) or estrogen precursors (testosterone in males, aromatised to estrogen centrally) have negligible effects on dopaminergic neurone survival in experimental PD, but can modify striatal dopamine levels via actions on the activity or adaptive responses of surviving cells. However, these effects are sexually dimorphic. In females, estradiol promotes adaptive responses in the partially injured NSDA pathway, preserving striatal dopamine, whereas in males gonadal steroids and exogenous estradiol have a negligible or even suppressive effect, effectively exacerbating dopamine loss. On balance, the different effects of gonadal factors in males and females contribute to sex differences in experimental PD. Fundamental sex differences in brain organization, including the sexually dimorphic networks regulating NSDA activity are likely to underpin these responses. In contrast, estrogen generated locally appears to preserve striatal dopamine in both sexes. The available data therefore highlight the need to understand the biological basis of sex-specific responses of the NSDA system to peripheral hormones, so as to realise the potential for sex-specific, hormone-based therapies in PD. Furthermore, they suggest that targeting central steroid generation could be equally effective in preserving striatal dopamine in both sexes. Clarification of the relative roles of peripheral and central sex steroid hormones is thus an important challenge for future studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T20:57:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-434cb138a766474baeb61ca47c78a8b0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2392
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T20:57:04Z
publishDate 2011-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Endocrinology
spelling doaj.art-434cb138a766474baeb61ca47c78a8b02022-12-22T00:51:04ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Endocrinology1664-23922011-11-01210.3389/fendo.2011.0008217054Peripheral vs. central sex steroid hormones in experimental Parkinson’s diseaseSimon eMcArthur0Glenda E Gillies1Imperial College LondonImperial College LondonThe nigrostriatal dopaminergic (NSDA) pathway degenerates in Parkinson’s disease (PD), which occurs with approximately twice the incidence in men than women. Studies of the influence of systemic estrogens in females suggest sex hormones contribute to these differences. In this review we analyse the evidence revealing great complexity in the response of the healthy and injured NSDA system to hormonal influences, and emphasize the importance of centrally generated estrogens. At physiological levels, circulating estrogen (in females) or estrogen precursors (testosterone in males, aromatised to estrogen centrally) have negligible effects on dopaminergic neurone survival in experimental PD, but can modify striatal dopamine levels via actions on the activity or adaptive responses of surviving cells. However, these effects are sexually dimorphic. In females, estradiol promotes adaptive responses in the partially injured NSDA pathway, preserving striatal dopamine, whereas in males gonadal steroids and exogenous estradiol have a negligible or even suppressive effect, effectively exacerbating dopamine loss. On balance, the different effects of gonadal factors in males and females contribute to sex differences in experimental PD. Fundamental sex differences in brain organization, including the sexually dimorphic networks regulating NSDA activity are likely to underpin these responses. In contrast, estrogen generated locally appears to preserve striatal dopamine in both sexes. The available data therefore highlight the need to understand the biological basis of sex-specific responses of the NSDA system to peripheral hormones, so as to realise the potential for sex-specific, hormone-based therapies in PD. Furthermore, they suggest that targeting central steroid generation could be equally effective in preserving striatal dopamine in both sexes. Clarification of the relative roles of peripheral and central sex steroid hormones is thus an important challenge for future studies.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2011.00082/fullParkinson's diseaseSexestrogenCentral vs. gonadal steroidsNigrostriatal pathway
spellingShingle Simon eMcArthur
Glenda E Gillies
Peripheral vs. central sex steroid hormones in experimental Parkinson’s disease
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Parkinson's disease
Sex
estrogen
Central vs. gonadal steroids
Nigrostriatal pathway
title Peripheral vs. central sex steroid hormones in experimental Parkinson’s disease
title_full Peripheral vs. central sex steroid hormones in experimental Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr Peripheral vs. central sex steroid hormones in experimental Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Peripheral vs. central sex steroid hormones in experimental Parkinson’s disease
title_short Peripheral vs. central sex steroid hormones in experimental Parkinson’s disease
title_sort peripheral vs central sex steroid hormones in experimental parkinson s disease
topic Parkinson's disease
Sex
estrogen
Central vs. gonadal steroids
Nigrostriatal pathway
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fendo.2011.00082/full
work_keys_str_mv AT simonemcarthur peripheralvscentralsexsteroidhormonesinexperimentalparkinsonsdisease
AT glendaegillies peripheralvscentralsexsteroidhormonesinexperimentalparkinsonsdisease