A practical alternative to calculating unmet need for family planning

Irit Sinai,1,2 Susan Igras,1 Rebecka Lundgren1 1Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; 2Palladium, Washington, DC, USA Abstract: The standard approach for measuring unmet need for family planning calculates actual, physiological unmet need and is useful for tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sinai I, Igras S, Lundgren R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-07-01
Series:Open Access Journal of Contraception
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/a-practical-alternative-to-calculating-unmet-need-for-family-planning-peer-reviewed-article-OAJC
_version_ 1828338346825351168
author Sinai I
Igras S
Lundgren R
author_facet Sinai I
Igras S
Lundgren R
author_sort Sinai I
collection DOAJ
description Irit Sinai,1,2 Susan Igras,1 Rebecka Lundgren1 1Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; 2Palladium, Washington, DC, USA Abstract: The standard approach for measuring unmet need for family planning calculates actual, physiological unmet need and is useful for tracking changes at the population level. We propose to supplement it with an alternate approach that relies on individual perceptions and can improve program design and implementation. The proposed approach categorizes individuals by their perceived need for family planning: real met need (current users of a modern method), perceived met need (current users of a traditional method), real no need, perceived no need (those with a physiological need for family planning who perceive no need), and perceived unmet need (those who realize they have a need but do not use a method). We tested this approach using data from Mali (n=425) and Benin (n=1080). We found that traditional method use was significantly higher in Benin than in Mali, resulting in different perceptions of unmet need in the two countries. In Mali, perceived unmet need was much higher. In Benin, perceived unmet need was low because women believed (incorrectly) that they were protected from pregnancy. Perceived no need – women who believed that they could not become pregnant despite the fact that they were fecund and sexually active – was quite high in both countries. We posit that interventions that address perceptions of unmet need, in addition to physiological risk of pregnancy, will more likely be effective in changing behavior. The suggested approach for calculating unmet need supplements the standard calculations and is helpful for designing programs to better address women’s and men’s individual needs in diverse contexts. Keywords: unmet need, family planning, contraception, Mali, Benin
first_indexed 2024-04-13T22:27:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-436fd3af95514320ad60bcf31064bda8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1179-1527
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T22:27:45Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Open Access Journal of Contraception
spelling doaj.art-436fd3af95514320ad60bcf31064bda82022-12-22T02:27:02ZengDove Medical PressOpen Access Journal of Contraception1179-15272017-07-01Volume 8535933943A practical alternative to calculating unmet need for family planningSinai IIgras SLundgren RIrit Sinai,1,2 Susan Igras,1 Rebecka Lundgren1 1Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; 2Palladium, Washington, DC, USA Abstract: The standard approach for measuring unmet need for family planning calculates actual, physiological unmet need and is useful for tracking changes at the population level. We propose to supplement it with an alternate approach that relies on individual perceptions and can improve program design and implementation. The proposed approach categorizes individuals by their perceived need for family planning: real met need (current users of a modern method), perceived met need (current users of a traditional method), real no need, perceived no need (those with a physiological need for family planning who perceive no need), and perceived unmet need (those who realize they have a need but do not use a method). We tested this approach using data from Mali (n=425) and Benin (n=1080). We found that traditional method use was significantly higher in Benin than in Mali, resulting in different perceptions of unmet need in the two countries. In Mali, perceived unmet need was much higher. In Benin, perceived unmet need was low because women believed (incorrectly) that they were protected from pregnancy. Perceived no need – women who believed that they could not become pregnant despite the fact that they were fecund and sexually active – was quite high in both countries. We posit that interventions that address perceptions of unmet need, in addition to physiological risk of pregnancy, will more likely be effective in changing behavior. The suggested approach for calculating unmet need supplements the standard calculations and is helpful for designing programs to better address women’s and men’s individual needs in diverse contexts. Keywords: unmet need, family planning, contraception, Mali, Beninhttps://www.dovepress.com/a-practical-alternative-to-calculating-unmet-need-for-family-planning-peer-reviewed-article-OAJCunmet needfamily planningcontraceptionMaliBenin
spellingShingle Sinai I
Igras S
Lundgren R
A practical alternative to calculating unmet need for family planning
Open Access Journal of Contraception
unmet need
family planning
contraception
Mali
Benin
title A practical alternative to calculating unmet need for family planning
title_full A practical alternative to calculating unmet need for family planning
title_fullStr A practical alternative to calculating unmet need for family planning
title_full_unstemmed A practical alternative to calculating unmet need for family planning
title_short A practical alternative to calculating unmet need for family planning
title_sort practical alternative to calculating unmet need for family planning
topic unmet need
family planning
contraception
Mali
Benin
url https://www.dovepress.com/a-practical-alternative-to-calculating-unmet-need-for-family-planning-peer-reviewed-article-OAJC
work_keys_str_mv AT sinaii apracticalalternativetocalculatingunmetneedforfamilyplanning
AT igrass apracticalalternativetocalculatingunmetneedforfamilyplanning
AT lundgrenr apracticalalternativetocalculatingunmetneedforfamilyplanning
AT sinaii practicalalternativetocalculatingunmetneedforfamilyplanning
AT igrass practicalalternativetocalculatingunmetneedforfamilyplanning
AT lundgrenr practicalalternativetocalculatingunmetneedforfamilyplanning