Deep decarbonization and U.S. biofuels production: a coordinated analysis with a detailed structural model and an integrated multisectoral model
Scenarios for deep decarbonization involve biomass for biofuels, biopower, and bioproducts, and they often include negative emissions via carbon capture and storage or utilization. However, critical questions remain about the feasibility of rapid growth to high levels of biomass utilization, given b...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IOP Publishing
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Environmental Research Letters |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf146 |
_version_ | 1797671589444059136 |
---|---|
author | Laura Vimmerstedt Swaroop Atnoorkar Candelaria Bergero Marshall Wise Steve Peterson Emily Newes Daniel Inman |
author_facet | Laura Vimmerstedt Swaroop Atnoorkar Candelaria Bergero Marshall Wise Steve Peterson Emily Newes Daniel Inman |
author_sort | Laura Vimmerstedt |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Scenarios for deep decarbonization involve biomass for biofuels, biopower, and bioproducts, and they often include negative emissions via carbon capture and storage or utilization. However, critical questions remain about the feasibility of rapid growth to high levels of biomass utilization, given biomass and land availability as well as historical growth rates of the biofuel industry. We address these questions through a unique coordinated analysis and comparison of carbon pricing effects on biomass utilization growth in the United States using a multisectoral integrated assessment model, the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM), and a biomass-to-biofuels system dynamics model, the Bioenergy Scenario Model (BSM). We harmonized and varied key factors—such as carbon prices, vehicle electrification, and arable land availability—in the two models. We varied the rate of biorefinery construction, the fungibility of feedstock types across conversion processes, and policy incentives in BSM. The rate of growth in biomass deployment under a carbon price in both models is within the range of current literature. However, the reallocation of land to biomass feedstocks would need to overcome bottlenecks to achieve growth consistent with deep decarbonization scenarios. Investments as a result of near-term policy incentives can develop technology and expand capacity—reducing costs, enabling flexibility in feedstock use, and improving stability—but if biomass demand is high, these investments might not overcome land reallocation bottlenecks. Biomass utilization for deep decarbonization relies on extraordinary growth in biomass availability and industrial capacity. In this paper, we quantify and describe the potential challenges of this rapid change. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T21:17:44Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-436fe7e224c9406d986c14fc14a718ad |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1748-9326 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T21:17:44Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | IOP Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Environmental Research Letters |
spelling | doaj.art-436fe7e224c9406d986c14fc14a718ad2023-09-28T15:26:58ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262023-01-01181010401310.1088/1748-9326/acf146Deep decarbonization and U.S. biofuels production: a coordinated analysis with a detailed structural model and an integrated multisectoral modelLaura Vimmerstedt0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0392-4431Swaroop Atnoorkar1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3262-9845Candelaria Bergero2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8937-6367Marshall Wise3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-0051Steve Peterson4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1202-8281Emily Newes5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7303-2589Daniel Inman6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8103-2076National Renewable Energy Laboratory , Golden, CO, United States of AmericaNational Renewable Energy Laboratory , Golden, CO, United States of AmericaPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Joint Global Change Research Institute , College Park, MD, United States of AmericaPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Joint Global Change Research Institute , College Park, MD, United States of AmericaIndependent Contractor , West Lebanon, NH, United States of AmericaNational Renewable Energy Laboratory , Golden, CO, United States of AmericaNational Renewable Energy Laboratory , Golden, CO, United States of AmericaScenarios for deep decarbonization involve biomass for biofuels, biopower, and bioproducts, and they often include negative emissions via carbon capture and storage or utilization. However, critical questions remain about the feasibility of rapid growth to high levels of biomass utilization, given biomass and land availability as well as historical growth rates of the biofuel industry. We address these questions through a unique coordinated analysis and comparison of carbon pricing effects on biomass utilization growth in the United States using a multisectoral integrated assessment model, the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM), and a biomass-to-biofuels system dynamics model, the Bioenergy Scenario Model (BSM). We harmonized and varied key factors—such as carbon prices, vehicle electrification, and arable land availability—in the two models. We varied the rate of biorefinery construction, the fungibility of feedstock types across conversion processes, and policy incentives in BSM. The rate of growth in biomass deployment under a carbon price in both models is within the range of current literature. However, the reallocation of land to biomass feedstocks would need to overcome bottlenecks to achieve growth consistent with deep decarbonization scenarios. Investments as a result of near-term policy incentives can develop technology and expand capacity—reducing costs, enabling flexibility in feedstock use, and improving stability—but if biomass demand is high, these investments might not overcome land reallocation bottlenecks. Biomass utilization for deep decarbonization relies on extraordinary growth in biomass availability and industrial capacity. In this paper, we quantify and describe the potential challenges of this rapid change.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf146climate changebiofuelsintegrated assessment modelsystem dynamicsland use |
spellingShingle | Laura Vimmerstedt Swaroop Atnoorkar Candelaria Bergero Marshall Wise Steve Peterson Emily Newes Daniel Inman Deep decarbonization and U.S. biofuels production: a coordinated analysis with a detailed structural model and an integrated multisectoral model Environmental Research Letters climate change biofuels integrated assessment model system dynamics land use |
title | Deep decarbonization and U.S. biofuels production: a coordinated analysis with a detailed structural model and an integrated multisectoral model |
title_full | Deep decarbonization and U.S. biofuels production: a coordinated analysis with a detailed structural model and an integrated multisectoral model |
title_fullStr | Deep decarbonization and U.S. biofuels production: a coordinated analysis with a detailed structural model and an integrated multisectoral model |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep decarbonization and U.S. biofuels production: a coordinated analysis with a detailed structural model and an integrated multisectoral model |
title_short | Deep decarbonization and U.S. biofuels production: a coordinated analysis with a detailed structural model and an integrated multisectoral model |
title_sort | deep decarbonization and u s biofuels production a coordinated analysis with a detailed structural model and an integrated multisectoral model |
topic | climate change biofuels integrated assessment model system dynamics land use |
url | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acf146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lauravimmerstedt deepdecarbonizationandusbiofuelsproductionacoordinatedanalysiswithadetailedstructuralmodelandanintegratedmultisectoralmodel AT swaroopatnoorkar deepdecarbonizationandusbiofuelsproductionacoordinatedanalysiswithadetailedstructuralmodelandanintegratedmultisectoralmodel AT candelariabergero deepdecarbonizationandusbiofuelsproductionacoordinatedanalysiswithadetailedstructuralmodelandanintegratedmultisectoralmodel AT marshallwise deepdecarbonizationandusbiofuelsproductionacoordinatedanalysiswithadetailedstructuralmodelandanintegratedmultisectoralmodel AT stevepeterson deepdecarbonizationandusbiofuelsproductionacoordinatedanalysiswithadetailedstructuralmodelandanintegratedmultisectoralmodel AT emilynewes deepdecarbonizationandusbiofuelsproductionacoordinatedanalysiswithadetailedstructuralmodelandanintegratedmultisectoralmodel AT danielinman deepdecarbonizationandusbiofuelsproductionacoordinatedanalysiswithadetailedstructuralmodelandanintegratedmultisectoralmodel |