Did DI do it? The impact of a programme designed to improve literacy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students in remote schools

Abstract Over the 10 years of ‘Closing the Gap’, several interventions designed to improve outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students have been trialled. In 2014 the Australian Government announced the ‘Flexible Literacy for Remote Primary Schools Programme’ (FLFRPSP) which was des...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John Guenther, Samuel Osborne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Unit, The University of Queensland 2020-01-01
Series:The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ajie.atsis.uq.edu.au/ajie/article/view/270
_version_ 1828076003646242816
author John Guenther
Samuel Osborne
author_facet John Guenther
Samuel Osborne
author_sort John Guenther
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Over the 10 years of ‘Closing the Gap’, several interventions designed to improve outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students have been trialled. In 2014 the Australian Government announced the ‘Flexible Literacy for Remote Primary Schools Programme’ (FLFRPSP) which was designed primarily to improve the literacy outcomes of students in remote schools with mostly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. The programme, using Direct Instruction (DI) or Explicit Direct Instruction, was extended to 2019 with more than $30 million invested. By 2017, 34 remote schools were participating in the Northern Territory, Queensland and Western Australia. This paper analyses My School data for 25 ‘very remote’ FLFRPSP schools with more than 80% Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander students. It considers Year 3 and 5 NAPLAN reading results and attendance rates for participating and non-participating primary schools in the 3 years before the programme's implementation and compares them with results since. Findings show that, compared to very remote schools without FLFRPSP, the programme has not improved students' literacy abilities and results. Attendance rates for intervention schools have declined faster than for non-intervention schools. The paper questions the ethics of policy implementation and the role of evidence as a tool for accountability.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T02:07:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-438b4abb119948ca9a6588c74f0ed2c3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2049-7784
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T02:07:13Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Unit, The University of Queensland
record_format Article
series The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education
spelling doaj.art-438b4abb119948ca9a6588c74f0ed2c32023-01-03T02:47:00ZengAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Unit, The University of QueenslandThe Australian Journal of Indigenous Education2049-77842020-01-0149210.1017/jie.2019.28Did DI do it? The impact of a programme designed to improve literacy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students in remote schoolsJohn Guenther0Samuel Osborne1Batchelor InstituteUniversity of South AustraliaAbstract Over the 10 years of ‘Closing the Gap’, several interventions designed to improve outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students have been trialled. In 2014 the Australian Government announced the ‘Flexible Literacy for Remote Primary Schools Programme’ (FLFRPSP) which was designed primarily to improve the literacy outcomes of students in remote schools with mostly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. The programme, using Direct Instruction (DI) or Explicit Direct Instruction, was extended to 2019 with more than $30 million invested. By 2017, 34 remote schools were participating in the Northern Territory, Queensland and Western Australia. This paper analyses My School data for 25 ‘very remote’ FLFRPSP schools with more than 80% Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander students. It considers Year 3 and 5 NAPLAN reading results and attendance rates for participating and non-participating primary schools in the 3 years before the programme's implementation and compares them with results since. Findings show that, compared to very remote schools without FLFRPSP, the programme has not improved students' literacy abilities and results. Attendance rates for intervention schools have declined faster than for non-intervention schools. The paper questions the ethics of policy implementation and the role of evidence as a tool for accountability. https://ajie.atsis.uq.edu.au/ajie/article/view/270Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander educationdirect instructionliteracy outcomespolicy interventionsremote education
spellingShingle John Guenther
Samuel Osborne
Did DI do it? The impact of a programme designed to improve literacy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students in remote schools
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education
direct instruction
literacy outcomes
policy interventions
remote education
title Did DI do it? The impact of a programme designed to improve literacy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students in remote schools
title_full Did DI do it? The impact of a programme designed to improve literacy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students in remote schools
title_fullStr Did DI do it? The impact of a programme designed to improve literacy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students in remote schools
title_full_unstemmed Did DI do it? The impact of a programme designed to improve literacy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students in remote schools
title_short Did DI do it? The impact of a programme designed to improve literacy for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students in remote schools
title_sort did di do it the impact of a programme designed to improve literacy for aboriginal and torres strait islander students in remote schools
topic Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education
direct instruction
literacy outcomes
policy interventions
remote education
url https://ajie.atsis.uq.edu.au/ajie/article/view/270
work_keys_str_mv AT johnguenther diddidoittheimpactofaprogrammedesignedtoimproveliteracyforaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderstudentsinremoteschools
AT samuelosborne diddidoittheimpactofaprogrammedesignedtoimproveliteracyforaboriginalandtorresstraitislanderstudentsinremoteschools