Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys
Background: Rates of caesarean section surgery are rising worldwide, but the determinants of this increase, especially in low-income and middle-income countries, are controversial. In this study, we aimed to analyse the contribution of specific obstetric populations to changes in caesarean section r...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2015-05-01
|
Series: | The Lancet Global Health |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X1570094X |
_version_ | 1818027701238235136 |
---|---|
author | Dr. Joshua P Vogel, MBBS Ana Pilar Betrán, PhD Nadia Vindevoghel, MD João Paulo Souza, PhD Maria Regina Torloni, PhD Prof. Jun Zhang, PhD Özge Tunçalp, PhD Rintaro Mori, MD Naho Morisaki, PhD Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo, MD Bernardo Hernandez, DSc Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas, DrSc Zahida Qureshi, MD A Metin Gülmezoglu, PhD Marleen Temmerman, PhD |
author_facet | Dr. Joshua P Vogel, MBBS Ana Pilar Betrán, PhD Nadia Vindevoghel, MD João Paulo Souza, PhD Maria Regina Torloni, PhD Prof. Jun Zhang, PhD Özge Tunçalp, PhD Rintaro Mori, MD Naho Morisaki, PhD Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo, MD Bernardo Hernandez, DSc Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas, DrSc Zahida Qureshi, MD A Metin Gülmezoglu, PhD Marleen Temmerman, PhD |
author_sort | Dr. Joshua P Vogel, MBBS |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Rates of caesarean section surgery are rising worldwide, but the determinants of this increase, especially in low-income and middle-income countries, are controversial. In this study, we aimed to analyse the contribution of specific obstetric populations to changes in caesarean section rates, by using the Robson classification in two WHO multicountry surveys of deliveries in health-care facilities. The Robson system classifies all deliveries into one of ten groups on the basis of five parameters: obstetric history, onset of labour, fetal lie, number of neonates, and gestational age.
Methods: We studied deliveries in 287 facilities in 21 countries that were included in both the WHO Global Survey of Maternal and Perinatal Health (WHOGS; 2004–08) and the WHO Multi-Country Survey of Maternal and Newborn Health (WHOMCS; 2010–11). We used the data from these surveys to establish the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in caesarean section rates per country. Countries were stratified according to Human Development Index (HDI) group (very high/high, medium, or low) and the Robson criteria were applied to both datasets. We report the relative size of each Robson group, the caesarean section rate in each Robson group, and the absolute and relative contributions made by each to the overall caesarean section rate.
Findings: The caesarean section rate increased overall between the two surveys (from 26·4% in the WHOGS to 31·2% in the WHOMCS, p=0·003) and in all countries except Japan. Use of obstetric interventions (induction, prelabour caesarean section, and overall caesarean section) increased over time. Caesarean section rates increased across most Robson groups in all HDI categories. Use of induction and prelabour caesarean section increased in very high/high and low HDI countries, and the caesarean section rate after induction in multiparous women increased significantly across all HDI groups. The proportion of women who had previously had a caesarean section increased in moderate and low HDI countries, as did the caesarean section rate in these women.
Interpretation: Use of the Robson criteria allows standardised comparisons of data across countries and timepoints and identifies the subpopulations driving changes in caesarean section rates. Women who have previously had a caesarean section are an increasingly important determinant of overall caesarean section rates in countries with a moderate or low HDI. Strategies to reduce the frequency of the procedure should include avoidance of medically unnecessary primary caesarean section. Improved case selection for induction and prelabour caesarean section could also reduce caesarean section rates.
Funding: None. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T04:52:05Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-43943a8e5ccd4307a5892cdd772abe44 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2214-109X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T04:52:05Z |
publishDate | 2015-05-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | The Lancet Global Health |
spelling | doaj.art-43943a8e5ccd4307a5892cdd772abe442022-12-22T02:01:35ZengElsevierThe Lancet Global Health2214-109X2015-05-0135e260e27010.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-XUse of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveysDr. Joshua P Vogel, MBBS0Ana Pilar Betrán, PhD1Nadia Vindevoghel, MD2João Paulo Souza, PhD3Maria Regina Torloni, PhD4Prof. Jun Zhang, PhD5Özge Tunçalp, PhD6Rintaro Mori, MD7Naho Morisaki, PhD8Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo, MD9Bernardo Hernandez, DSc10Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas, DrSc11Zahida Qureshi, MD12A Metin Gülmezoglu, PhD13Marleen Temmerman, PhD14School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, AustraliaUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandCalgary Foothills Primary Care Network, Alberta Health, Calgary, AB, CanadaDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Obstetrics, São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, BrazilXinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, ChinaUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, JapanNational Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, MexicoInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USASocial Protection and Health Division, Inter-American Development Bank, Mexico City, MexicoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, College of Health Science, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, KenyaUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, SwitzerlandBackground: Rates of caesarean section surgery are rising worldwide, but the determinants of this increase, especially in low-income and middle-income countries, are controversial. In this study, we aimed to analyse the contribution of specific obstetric populations to changes in caesarean section rates, by using the Robson classification in two WHO multicountry surveys of deliveries in health-care facilities. The Robson system classifies all deliveries into one of ten groups on the basis of five parameters: obstetric history, onset of labour, fetal lie, number of neonates, and gestational age. Methods: We studied deliveries in 287 facilities in 21 countries that were included in both the WHO Global Survey of Maternal and Perinatal Health (WHOGS; 2004–08) and the WHO Multi-Country Survey of Maternal and Newborn Health (WHOMCS; 2010–11). We used the data from these surveys to establish the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in caesarean section rates per country. Countries were stratified according to Human Development Index (HDI) group (very high/high, medium, or low) and the Robson criteria were applied to both datasets. We report the relative size of each Robson group, the caesarean section rate in each Robson group, and the absolute and relative contributions made by each to the overall caesarean section rate. Findings: The caesarean section rate increased overall between the two surveys (from 26·4% in the WHOGS to 31·2% in the WHOMCS, p=0·003) and in all countries except Japan. Use of obstetric interventions (induction, prelabour caesarean section, and overall caesarean section) increased over time. Caesarean section rates increased across most Robson groups in all HDI categories. Use of induction and prelabour caesarean section increased in very high/high and low HDI countries, and the caesarean section rate after induction in multiparous women increased significantly across all HDI groups. The proportion of women who had previously had a caesarean section increased in moderate and low HDI countries, as did the caesarean section rate in these women. Interpretation: Use of the Robson criteria allows standardised comparisons of data across countries and timepoints and identifies the subpopulations driving changes in caesarean section rates. Women who have previously had a caesarean section are an increasingly important determinant of overall caesarean section rates in countries with a moderate or low HDI. Strategies to reduce the frequency of the procedure should include avoidance of medically unnecessary primary caesarean section. Improved case selection for induction and prelabour caesarean section could also reduce caesarean section rates. Funding: None.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X1570094X |
spellingShingle | Dr. Joshua P Vogel, MBBS Ana Pilar Betrán, PhD Nadia Vindevoghel, MD João Paulo Souza, PhD Maria Regina Torloni, PhD Prof. Jun Zhang, PhD Özge Tunçalp, PhD Rintaro Mori, MD Naho Morisaki, PhD Eduardo Ortiz-Panozo, MD Bernardo Hernandez, DSc Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas, DrSc Zahida Qureshi, MD A Metin Gülmezoglu, PhD Marleen Temmerman, PhD Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys The Lancet Global Health |
title | Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys |
title_full | Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys |
title_fullStr | Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys |
title_short | Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys |
title_sort | use of the robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries a secondary analysis of two who multicountry surveys |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X1570094X |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drjoshuapvogelmbbs useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT anapilarbetranphd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT nadiavindevoghelmd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT joaopaulosouzaphd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT mariareginatorloniphd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT profjunzhangphd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT ozgetuncalpphd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT rintaromorimd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT nahomorisakiphd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT eduardoortizpanozomd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT bernardohernandezdsc useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT ricardoperezcuevasdrsc useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT zahidaqureshimd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT ametingulmezogluphd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys AT marleentemmermanphd useoftherobsonclassificationtoassesscaesareansectiontrendsin21countriesasecondaryanalysisoftwowhomulticountrysurveys |