Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports
Peer review is often criticized for being flawed, subjective and biased, but research into peer review has been hindered by a lack of access to peer review reports. Here we report the results of a study in which text-analysis software was used to determine the linguistic characteristics of 472,449 p...
Main Authors: | Ivan Buljan, Daniel Garcia-Costa, Francisco Grimaldo, Flaminio Squazzoni, Ana Marušić |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
2020-07-01
|
Series: | eLife |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://elifesciences.org/articles/53249 |
Similar Items
-
A new twist on peer review
by: Mark Patterson, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals
by: Daniel Garcia-Costa, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Making the most of peer review
by: Nikolai Slavov
Published: (2015-11-01) -
Does peer review improve the statistical content of manuscripts? A study on 27 467 submissions to four journals
by: Daniel Garcia-Costa, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
What makes an eLife paper in epidemiology and global health?
by: Mark Jit, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01)