Chlorite geochemical vectoring of ore bodies: a natural kind clustering approach

Chlorite has long been considered a mineral group likely to have different trace element chemistry with proximity to mineralization, and therefore can be used to vector towards ore bodies. However, due to their geochemical complexity, it has proven challenging to develop a simple vectoring method ba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicole Freij, Daniel David Gregory, Shuang Zhang, Shaunna M. Morrison
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Earth Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1222291/full
_version_ 1797741492569112576
author Nicole Freij
Daniel David Gregory
Shuang Zhang
Shaunna M. Morrison
author_facet Nicole Freij
Daniel David Gregory
Shuang Zhang
Shaunna M. Morrison
author_sort Nicole Freij
collection DOAJ
description Chlorite has long been considered a mineral group likely to have different trace element chemistry with proximity to mineralization, and therefore can be used to vector towards ore bodies. However, due to their geochemical complexity, it has proven challenging to develop a simple vectoring method based on the variation in abundance of one or a few chemical elements or isotopes. Machine learning, specifically cluster analysis, provides a potential mathematical tool for characterizing multidimensional geochemical correlations with proximity to mineralization. In this contribution we conducted a cluster analysis on 23 elements from 1,679 distinct chlorite sample analyses. The combination of this clustering technique with classification by proximity to the ore body, 1) explores and characterizes the nature of chlorite composition and proximity to ore bodies and 2) tests the efficacy of clustering-classification methods to predict whether a chlorite sample is near to an ore body. We found that chlorite chemistry is more strongly controlled by deposit type than proximity to mineralization and that cluster analysis of chlorite trace element content is likely not a viable way to develop vectors towards porphyry mineralization.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T14:27:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-43b27f66543e4b8d9d2da5bd1da80af9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-6463
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T14:27:10Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Earth Science
spelling doaj.art-43b27f66543e4b8d9d2da5bd1da80af92023-08-17T23:27:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Earth Science2296-64632023-08-011110.3389/feart.2023.12222911222291Chlorite geochemical vectoring of ore bodies: a natural kind clustering approachNicole Freij0Daniel David Gregory1Shuang Zhang2Shaunna M. Morrison3Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaDepartment of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United StatesEarth and Planets Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science (CIS), Washington, CA, United StatesChlorite has long been considered a mineral group likely to have different trace element chemistry with proximity to mineralization, and therefore can be used to vector towards ore bodies. However, due to their geochemical complexity, it has proven challenging to develop a simple vectoring method based on the variation in abundance of one or a few chemical elements or isotopes. Machine learning, specifically cluster analysis, provides a potential mathematical tool for characterizing multidimensional geochemical correlations with proximity to mineralization. In this contribution we conducted a cluster analysis on 23 elements from 1,679 distinct chlorite sample analyses. The combination of this clustering technique with classification by proximity to the ore body, 1) explores and characterizes the nature of chlorite composition and proximity to ore bodies and 2) tests the efficacy of clustering-classification methods to predict whether a chlorite sample is near to an ore body. We found that chlorite chemistry is more strongly controlled by deposit type than proximity to mineralization and that cluster analysis of chlorite trace element content is likely not a viable way to develop vectors towards porphyry mineralization.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1222291/fullcluster analysisporphyrychloriteLA-ICPMStrace elementvector
spellingShingle Nicole Freij
Daniel David Gregory
Shuang Zhang
Shaunna M. Morrison
Chlorite geochemical vectoring of ore bodies: a natural kind clustering approach
Frontiers in Earth Science
cluster analysis
porphyry
chlorite
LA-ICPMS
trace element
vector
title Chlorite geochemical vectoring of ore bodies: a natural kind clustering approach
title_full Chlorite geochemical vectoring of ore bodies: a natural kind clustering approach
title_fullStr Chlorite geochemical vectoring of ore bodies: a natural kind clustering approach
title_full_unstemmed Chlorite geochemical vectoring of ore bodies: a natural kind clustering approach
title_short Chlorite geochemical vectoring of ore bodies: a natural kind clustering approach
title_sort chlorite geochemical vectoring of ore bodies a natural kind clustering approach
topic cluster analysis
porphyry
chlorite
LA-ICPMS
trace element
vector
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1222291/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolefreij chloritegeochemicalvectoringoforebodiesanaturalkindclusteringapproach
AT danieldavidgregory chloritegeochemicalvectoringoforebodiesanaturalkindclusteringapproach
AT shuangzhang chloritegeochemicalvectoringoforebodiesanaturalkindclusteringapproach
AT shaunnammorrison chloritegeochemicalvectoringoforebodiesanaturalkindclusteringapproach