Robot-Aided Systems for Improving the Assessment of Upper Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review

Spasticity is a motor disorder that causes stiffness or tightness of the muscles and can interfere with normal movement, speech, and gait. Traditionally, the spasticity assessment is carried out by clinicians using standardized procedures for objective evaluation. However, these procedures are manua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rubén de-la-Torre, Edwin Daniel Oña, Carlos Balaguer, Alberto Jardón
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/18/5251
_version_ 1827706215553040384
author Rubén de-la-Torre
Edwin Daniel Oña
Carlos Balaguer
Alberto Jardón
author_facet Rubén de-la-Torre
Edwin Daniel Oña
Carlos Balaguer
Alberto Jardón
author_sort Rubén de-la-Torre
collection DOAJ
description Spasticity is a motor disorder that causes stiffness or tightness of the muscles and can interfere with normal movement, speech, and gait. Traditionally, the spasticity assessment is carried out by clinicians using standardized procedures for objective evaluation. However, these procedures are manually performed and, thereby, they could be influenced by the clinician’s subjectivity or expertise. The automation of such traditional methods for spasticity evaluation is an interesting and emerging field in neurorehabilitation. One of the most promising approaches is the use of robot-aided systems. In this paper, a systematic review of systems focused on the assessment of upper limb (UL) spasticity using robotic technology is presented. A systematic search and review of related articles in the literature were conducted. The chosen works were analyzed according to the morphology of devices, the data acquisition systems, the outcome generation method, and the focus of intervention (assessment and/or training). Finally, a series of guidelines and challenges that must be considered when designing and implementing fully-automated robot-aided systems for the assessment of UL spasticity are summarized.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T16:20:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-43cdd0266d7d499ba0b3528ecb8924f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T16:20:28Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-43cdd0266d7d499ba0b3528ecb8924f82023-11-20T13:43:08ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-09-012018525110.3390/s20185251Robot-Aided Systems for Improving the Assessment of Upper Limb Spasticity: A Systematic ReviewRubén de-la-Torre0Edwin Daniel Oña1Carlos Balaguer2Alberto Jardón3Department of Systems Engineering and Automation, University Carlos III of Madrid, Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911 Leganés, SpainDepartment of Systems Engineering and Automation, University Carlos III of Madrid, Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911 Leganés, SpainDepartment of Systems Engineering and Automation, University Carlos III of Madrid, Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911 Leganés, SpainDepartment of Systems Engineering and Automation, University Carlos III of Madrid, Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911 Leganés, SpainSpasticity is a motor disorder that causes stiffness or tightness of the muscles and can interfere with normal movement, speech, and gait. Traditionally, the spasticity assessment is carried out by clinicians using standardized procedures for objective evaluation. However, these procedures are manually performed and, thereby, they could be influenced by the clinician’s subjectivity or expertise. The automation of such traditional methods for spasticity evaluation is an interesting and emerging field in neurorehabilitation. One of the most promising approaches is the use of robot-aided systems. In this paper, a systematic review of systems focused on the assessment of upper limb (UL) spasticity using robotic technology is presented. A systematic search and review of related articles in the literature were conducted. The chosen works were analyzed according to the morphology of devices, the data acquisition systems, the outcome generation method, and the focus of intervention (assessment and/or training). Finally, a series of guidelines and challenges that must be considered when designing and implementing fully-automated robot-aided systems for the assessment of UL spasticity are summarized.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/18/5251upper limbspasticitycooperative robotsrobot-assisted rehabilitationassessment
spellingShingle Rubén de-la-Torre
Edwin Daniel Oña
Carlos Balaguer
Alberto Jardón
Robot-Aided Systems for Improving the Assessment of Upper Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review
Sensors
upper limb
spasticity
cooperative robots
robot-assisted rehabilitation
assessment
title Robot-Aided Systems for Improving the Assessment of Upper Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review
title_full Robot-Aided Systems for Improving the Assessment of Upper Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Robot-Aided Systems for Improving the Assessment of Upper Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Robot-Aided Systems for Improving the Assessment of Upper Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review
title_short Robot-Aided Systems for Improving the Assessment of Upper Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review
title_sort robot aided systems for improving the assessment of upper limb spasticity a systematic review
topic upper limb
spasticity
cooperative robots
robot-assisted rehabilitation
assessment
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/18/5251
work_keys_str_mv AT rubendelatorre robotaidedsystemsforimprovingtheassessmentofupperlimbspasticityasystematicreview
AT edwindanielona robotaidedsystemsforimprovingtheassessmentofupperlimbspasticityasystematicreview
AT carlosbalaguer robotaidedsystemsforimprovingtheassessmentofupperlimbspasticityasystematicreview
AT albertojardon robotaidedsystemsforimprovingtheassessmentofupperlimbspasticityasystematicreview