Magmatic surge requires two-stage model for the Laramide orogeny

Abstract The Laramide orogeny is a pivotal time in the geological development of western North America, but its driving mechanism is controversial. Most prominent models suggest this event was caused by the collision of an oceanic plateau with the Southern California Batholith (SCB) which caused the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joshua J. Schwartz, Jade Star Lackey, Elena A. Miranda, Keith A. Klepeis, Gabriela Mora-Klepeis, Francine Robles, Jonathan D. Bixler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-06-01
Series:Nature Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39473-7
_version_ 1797789695011192832
author Joshua J. Schwartz
Jade Star Lackey
Elena A. Miranda
Keith A. Klepeis
Gabriela Mora-Klepeis
Francine Robles
Jonathan D. Bixler
author_facet Joshua J. Schwartz
Jade Star Lackey
Elena A. Miranda
Keith A. Klepeis
Gabriela Mora-Klepeis
Francine Robles
Jonathan D. Bixler
author_sort Joshua J. Schwartz
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The Laramide orogeny is a pivotal time in the geological development of western North America, but its driving mechanism is controversial. Most prominent models suggest this event was caused by the collision of an oceanic plateau with the Southern California Batholith (SCB) which caused the angle of subduction beneath the continent to shallow and led to shut-down of the arc. Here, we use over 280 zircon and titanite Pb/U ages from the SCB to establish the timing and duration of magmatism, metamorphism and deformation. We show that magmatism was surging in the SCB from 90 to 70 Ma, the lower crust was hot, and cooling occurred after 75 Ma. These data contradict plateau underthrusting and flat-slab subduction as the driving mechanism for early Laramide deformation. We propose that the Laramide orogeny is a two-stage event consisting of: 1) an arc ‘flare-up’ phase in the SCB from 90-75 Ma; and 2) a widespread mountain building phase in the Laramide foreland belt from 75-50 Ma that is linked to subduction of an oceanic plateau.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T01:54:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-43d7a47020694f6ab7227d8b5f54b8c3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-1723
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T01:54:20Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Nature Communications
spelling doaj.art-43d7a47020694f6ab7227d8b5f54b8c32023-07-02T11:19:39ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232023-06-0114111110.1038/s41467-023-39473-7Magmatic surge requires two-stage model for the Laramide orogenyJoshua J. Schwartz0Jade Star Lackey1Elena A. Miranda2Keith A. Klepeis3Gabriela Mora-Klepeis4Francine Robles5Jonathan D. Bixler6Department of Geological Sciences, California State University NorthridgeGeology Department, Pomona CollegeDepartment of Geological Sciences, California State University NorthridgeDepartment of Geography & Geosciences, The University of VermontDepartment of Geography & Geosciences, The University of VermontDepartment of Geological Sciences, California State University NorthridgeDepartment of Geological Sciences, California State University NorthridgeAbstract The Laramide orogeny is a pivotal time in the geological development of western North America, but its driving mechanism is controversial. Most prominent models suggest this event was caused by the collision of an oceanic plateau with the Southern California Batholith (SCB) which caused the angle of subduction beneath the continent to shallow and led to shut-down of the arc. Here, we use over 280 zircon and titanite Pb/U ages from the SCB to establish the timing and duration of magmatism, metamorphism and deformation. We show that magmatism was surging in the SCB from 90 to 70 Ma, the lower crust was hot, and cooling occurred after 75 Ma. These data contradict plateau underthrusting and flat-slab subduction as the driving mechanism for early Laramide deformation. We propose that the Laramide orogeny is a two-stage event consisting of: 1) an arc ‘flare-up’ phase in the SCB from 90-75 Ma; and 2) a widespread mountain building phase in the Laramide foreland belt from 75-50 Ma that is linked to subduction of an oceanic plateau.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39473-7
spellingShingle Joshua J. Schwartz
Jade Star Lackey
Elena A. Miranda
Keith A. Klepeis
Gabriela Mora-Klepeis
Francine Robles
Jonathan D. Bixler
Magmatic surge requires two-stage model for the Laramide orogeny
Nature Communications
title Magmatic surge requires two-stage model for the Laramide orogeny
title_full Magmatic surge requires two-stage model for the Laramide orogeny
title_fullStr Magmatic surge requires two-stage model for the Laramide orogeny
title_full_unstemmed Magmatic surge requires two-stage model for the Laramide orogeny
title_short Magmatic surge requires two-stage model for the Laramide orogeny
title_sort magmatic surge requires two stage model for the laramide orogeny
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39473-7
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuajschwartz magmaticsurgerequirestwostagemodelforthelaramideorogeny
AT jadestarlackey magmaticsurgerequirestwostagemodelforthelaramideorogeny
AT elenaamiranda magmaticsurgerequirestwostagemodelforthelaramideorogeny
AT keithaklepeis magmaticsurgerequirestwostagemodelforthelaramideorogeny
AT gabrielamoraklepeis magmaticsurgerequirestwostagemodelforthelaramideorogeny
AT francinerobles magmaticsurgerequirestwostagemodelforthelaramideorogeny
AT jonathandbixler magmaticsurgerequirestwostagemodelforthelaramideorogeny