Retouching Medieval Sculptures in Norwegian Churches: Fifty Years of Practical Work and Written Reports

The focus of this article is retouching of medieval sculptures in Norwegian churches. Our aim is to discuss past and current practices by analysing conser-vation treatment reports. We study the reasoning behind the decision making to the extent the information is available in the reports, and assess...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karen Mengshoel, Nina Kjølsen Jernæs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Novus 2018-03-01
Series:Collegium Medievale
Online Access:http://ojs.novus.no/index.php/CM/article/view/1485
_version_ 1818312732242345984
author Karen Mengshoel
Nina Kjølsen Jernæs
author_facet Karen Mengshoel
Nina Kjølsen Jernæs
author_sort Karen Mengshoel
collection DOAJ
description The focus of this article is retouching of medieval sculptures in Norwegian churches. Our aim is to discuss past and current practices by analysing conser-vation treatment reports. We study the reasoning behind the decision making to the extent the information is available in the reports, and assess the reports as source material. To form a background for the discussions, we review rele-vant literature on history of retouching. We study conservation treatment re-ports in the period from c. 1970 to date and we have a data set consisting of 65 reports. Our results show that over half of the reports include decision making for retouching the artwork. The data set also shows changes through time in retouching techniques and methods. We discuss the reasons for differences in past and present practises after registering changes in conservation ideology and the development of the conservation training. Discrepancies between writ-ten retouching theories and conservation practices are assessed. The article also discusses conservation reports as source material. Since we have studied prac-tices within our own institution, objectivity is a part of the discussion, along with possible future projects that may follow from this research. In conclusion the conservation treatment reports reflect changes in conservation education, the profession's ethics, retouching methodology and decision making. The re-ports give us descriptive information about the objects and their condition, but the chosen retouching procedure is often coloured by the individual conserva-tor's values and perspectives. The material, which spans almost ï¬fty years, clearly mirrors the tendencies in the methodology of visual reintegration.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T08:22:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-43d8355dc36a4517b37df9d7f61900ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0801-9282
2387-6700
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T08:22:31Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher Novus
record_format Article
series Collegium Medievale
spelling doaj.art-43d8355dc36a4517b37df9d7f61900ce2022-12-21T23:53:58ZengNovusCollegium Medievale0801-92822387-67002018-03-01301441Retouching Medieval Sculptures in Norwegian Churches: Fifty Years of Practical Work and Written ReportsKaren MengshoelNina Kjølsen JernæsThe focus of this article is retouching of medieval sculptures in Norwegian churches. Our aim is to discuss past and current practices by analysing conser-vation treatment reports. We study the reasoning behind the decision making to the extent the information is available in the reports, and assess the reports as source material. To form a background for the discussions, we review rele-vant literature on history of retouching. We study conservation treatment re-ports in the period from c. 1970 to date and we have a data set consisting of 65 reports. Our results show that over half of the reports include decision making for retouching the artwork. The data set also shows changes through time in retouching techniques and methods. We discuss the reasons for differences in past and present practises after registering changes in conservation ideology and the development of the conservation training. Discrepancies between writ-ten retouching theories and conservation practices are assessed. The article also discusses conservation reports as source material. Since we have studied prac-tices within our own institution, objectivity is a part of the discussion, along with possible future projects that may follow from this research. In conclusion the conservation treatment reports reflect changes in conservation education, the profession's ethics, retouching methodology and decision making. The re-ports give us descriptive information about the objects and their condition, but the chosen retouching procedure is often coloured by the individual conserva-tor's values and perspectives. The material, which spans almost ï¬fty years, clearly mirrors the tendencies in the methodology of visual reintegration.http://ojs.novus.no/index.php/CM/article/view/1485
spellingShingle Karen Mengshoel
Nina Kjølsen Jernæs
Retouching Medieval Sculptures in Norwegian Churches: Fifty Years of Practical Work and Written Reports
Collegium Medievale
title Retouching Medieval Sculptures in Norwegian Churches: Fifty Years of Practical Work and Written Reports
title_full Retouching Medieval Sculptures in Norwegian Churches: Fifty Years of Practical Work and Written Reports
title_fullStr Retouching Medieval Sculptures in Norwegian Churches: Fifty Years of Practical Work and Written Reports
title_full_unstemmed Retouching Medieval Sculptures in Norwegian Churches: Fifty Years of Practical Work and Written Reports
title_short Retouching Medieval Sculptures in Norwegian Churches: Fifty Years of Practical Work and Written Reports
title_sort retouching medieval sculptures in norwegian churches fifty years of practical work and written reports
url http://ojs.novus.no/index.php/CM/article/view/1485
work_keys_str_mv AT karenmengshoel retouchingmedievalsculpturesinnorwegianchurchesfiftyyearsofpracticalworkandwrittenreports
AT ninakjølsenjernæs retouchingmedievalsculpturesinnorwegianchurchesfiftyyearsofpracticalworkandwrittenreports