Economic Value of Fosaprepitant-Containing Regimen in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in China: Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of fosaprepitant (FosAPR)-containing regimen for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) among patients receiving high emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) from the Chinese payer's per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xinglu Xu, Yuwen Bao, Kai Xu, Zhuolin Zhang, Ningli Zhao, Xin Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.913129/full
_version_ 1828764022223142912
author Xinglu Xu
Yuwen Bao
Kai Xu
Zhuolin Zhang
Ningli Zhao
Xin Li
Xin Li
Xin Li
author_facet Xinglu Xu
Yuwen Bao
Kai Xu
Zhuolin Zhang
Ningli Zhao
Xin Li
Xin Li
Xin Li
author_sort Xinglu Xu
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of fosaprepitant (FosAPR)-containing regimen for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) among patients receiving high emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) from the Chinese payer's perspective.MethodsA decision tree model was established to measure the 5-day costs and health outcomes between the APR-containing regimen (aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone) and FosAPR-containing regimen (fosaprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone). Clinical data were derived from a randomized, double-blind controlled trial on Chinese inpatients who received HEC. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were used to estimate the utility outcomes and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to assess the economics of FosAPR. A static budget impact model was developed to assess the impact of FosAPR as a new addition to the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) on the medical insurance fund within 3 years in Nanjing, China.ResultsCompared with APR, FosAPR had a mean health-care savings of ¥121.56 but got a reduction of 0.0001815 QALY, resulting in an ICER of ¥669926.19 per QALY. Deterministic sensitivity analysis revealed that the cost of APR was the most influential factor to the ICER. The cost of FosAPR and the complete control rate of the delayed period also had a high impact on the results. According to the probabilistic analysis, the acceptability of FosAPR was more than 80% when the Chinese willingness-to-pay (WTP) was ¥215,999. FosAPR would lead to a 3-year medical insurance payment increase of ¥1.84 million compared with ¥1.49 million before FosAPR entered NRDL in Nanjing. The total budget increased with a cumulative cost of ¥694,829 and covered an additional 341 patients who benefited from FosAPR in Nanjing. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that the model of budget impact analysis was stable.ConclusionFosAPR had a similar treatment effect to APR but was cost-effective in China at the current WTP threshold. The total budget of medical insurance payments of Nanjing slightly increased year by year after the inclusion of FosAPR. Its inclusion in the NRDL would be acceptable and also expand the coverage of patients who benefited from FosAPR.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T02:13:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-43e429dbf91a457b98a5c05a1c6f71a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2565
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T02:13:04Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj.art-43e429dbf91a457b98a5c05a1c6f71a52022-12-22T01:24:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652022-07-011010.3389/fpubh.2022.913129913129Economic Value of Fosaprepitant-Containing Regimen in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in China: Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact AnalysisXinglu Xu0Yuwen Bao1Kai Xu2Zhuolin Zhang3Ningli Zhao4Xin Li5Xin Li6Xin Li7Department of Regulatory Science and Pharmacoeconomics, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Regulatory Science and Pharmacoeconomics, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Regulatory Science and Pharmacoeconomics, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Regulatory Science and Pharmacoeconomics, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Health Policy, School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaCenter for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of fosaprepitant (FosAPR)-containing regimen for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) among patients receiving high emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) from the Chinese payer's perspective.MethodsA decision tree model was established to measure the 5-day costs and health outcomes between the APR-containing regimen (aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone) and FosAPR-containing regimen (fosaprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone). Clinical data were derived from a randomized, double-blind controlled trial on Chinese inpatients who received HEC. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were used to estimate the utility outcomes and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to assess the economics of FosAPR. A static budget impact model was developed to assess the impact of FosAPR as a new addition to the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) on the medical insurance fund within 3 years in Nanjing, China.ResultsCompared with APR, FosAPR had a mean health-care savings of ¥121.56 but got a reduction of 0.0001815 QALY, resulting in an ICER of ¥669926.19 per QALY. Deterministic sensitivity analysis revealed that the cost of APR was the most influential factor to the ICER. The cost of FosAPR and the complete control rate of the delayed period also had a high impact on the results. According to the probabilistic analysis, the acceptability of FosAPR was more than 80% when the Chinese willingness-to-pay (WTP) was ¥215,999. FosAPR would lead to a 3-year medical insurance payment increase of ¥1.84 million compared with ¥1.49 million before FosAPR entered NRDL in Nanjing. The total budget increased with a cumulative cost of ¥694,829 and covered an additional 341 patients who benefited from FosAPR in Nanjing. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that the model of budget impact analysis was stable.ConclusionFosAPR had a similar treatment effect to APR but was cost-effective in China at the current WTP threshold. The total budget of medical insurance payments of Nanjing slightly increased year by year after the inclusion of FosAPR. Its inclusion in the NRDL would be acceptable and also expand the coverage of patients who benefited from FosAPR.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.913129/fullcost-effectivenessbudget impact analysisantiemeticchemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitingfosaprepitant
spellingShingle Xinglu Xu
Yuwen Bao
Kai Xu
Zhuolin Zhang
Ningli Zhao
Xin Li
Xin Li
Xin Li
Economic Value of Fosaprepitant-Containing Regimen in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in China: Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis
Frontiers in Public Health
cost-effectiveness
budget impact analysis
antiemetic
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
fosaprepitant
title Economic Value of Fosaprepitant-Containing Regimen in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in China: Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis
title_full Economic Value of Fosaprepitant-Containing Regimen in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in China: Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis
title_fullStr Economic Value of Fosaprepitant-Containing Regimen in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in China: Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Economic Value of Fosaprepitant-Containing Regimen in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in China: Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis
title_short Economic Value of Fosaprepitant-Containing Regimen in the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in China: Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact Analysis
title_sort economic value of fosaprepitant containing regimen in the prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in china cost effectiveness and budget impact analysis
topic cost-effectiveness
budget impact analysis
antiemetic
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
fosaprepitant
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.913129/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xingluxu economicvalueoffosaprepitantcontainingregimeninthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginchinacosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysis
AT yuwenbao economicvalueoffosaprepitantcontainingregimeninthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginchinacosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysis
AT kaixu economicvalueoffosaprepitantcontainingregimeninthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginchinacosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysis
AT zhuolinzhang economicvalueoffosaprepitantcontainingregimeninthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginchinacosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysis
AT ninglizhao economicvalueoffosaprepitantcontainingregimeninthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginchinacosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysis
AT xinli economicvalueoffosaprepitantcontainingregimeninthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginchinacosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysis
AT xinli economicvalueoffosaprepitantcontainingregimeninthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginchinacosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysis
AT xinli economicvalueoffosaprepitantcontainingregimeninthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitinginchinacosteffectivenessandbudgetimpactanalysis