Beyond Reasonable Doubt: An Abductive Dilemma in Criminal Law
In criminal cases at common law, juries are permitted to convict on wholly circumstantial evidence even in the face of a reasonable case for acquittal. This generates the highly counterintuitive—if not absurd—consequence that there being reason to think that the accused didn’t do it is not reason to...
Main Author: | John Woods |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2008-02-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/514 |
Similar Items
-
Application of Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Laws in Indonesia
by: Karunia Pangestu, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Ignorance and Semantic Tableaux: Aliseda on Abduction
by: John Woods
Published: (2009-12-01) -
Logical inference of evidence: analysis of simulation processes based on evidential reasoning of context
by: Sergio Andrés Caballero Palomino, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Procedure of Circumstantial Evidences in Islamic Criminal Law
by: Mushtaq Aḥmad, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
The relevance of evidence as the main criterion for evaluating evidence
by: Zhanibekov A.K., et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)