Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Background: Patients with a pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) may have concurrent adjacent segment disease (ASD). Although prior studies have shown posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) is effective in repairing pseudarthrosis, improvement in patient re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grant O. Schmidt, MD, Steven D. Glassman, MD, Marko Tomov, MD, John R. Dimar, II, MD, Charles H. Crawford, III, MD, Leah Y. Carreon, MD, MSc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-06-01
Series:North American Spine Society Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548423000252
_version_ 1797796314070646784
author Grant O. Schmidt, MD
Steven D. Glassman, MD
Marko Tomov, MD
John R. Dimar, II, MD
Charles H. Crawford, III, MD
Leah Y. Carreon, MD, MSc
author_facet Grant O. Schmidt, MD
Steven D. Glassman, MD
Marko Tomov, MD
John R. Dimar, II, MD
Charles H. Crawford, III, MD
Leah Y. Carreon, MD, MSc
author_sort Grant O. Schmidt, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Patients with a pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) may have concurrent adjacent segment disease (ASD). Although prior studies have shown posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) is effective in repairing pseudarthrosis, improvement in patient reported outcomes (PROs) has been marginal. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of PCDF in achieving symptom relief in patients with pseudarthrosis after ACDF and whether that is altered by the additional treatment of ASD. Methods: Thirty-two patients with pseudarthrosis were compared with 31 patients with pseudarthrosis and concurrent ASD after ACDF who underwent revision PCDF with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Primary outcomes measures included the neck disability index (NDI), and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores for neck and arm pain. Secondary measures included estimated blood loss (EBL), operating room (OR) time, and length of stay. Results: Demographics between cohorts were similar, however there was a significantly higher mean body mass index (BMI) in the group with concurrent ASD (32.23 vs. 27.76, p=.007). Patients with concurrent ASD had more levels fused during PCDF (3.7 vs. 1.9, p<.001), greater EBL (165 cc vs. 106 cc, p=.054), and longer OR time (256 minutes vs. 202 minutes, p<.000). Preoperative PROs for NDI (56.7 vs. 56.5, p=.954), NRS arm pain (5.9 vs. 5.7, p=.758), and NRS neck pain (6.6 vs. 6.8, p=.726) were similar in both cohorts. At 12 months patients with concurrent ASD experienced a slightly greater, but not statistically significant, improvement in PROs (Δ NDI 4.40 vs. -1.44, Δ NRS neck pain 1.17 vs. 0.42, Δ NRS arm pain 1.28 vs. 0.10, p=.107). Conclusions: PCDF is a standard procedure for treatment of pseudarthrosis following ACDF, however improvements in PROs are marginal. Slightly greater improvements were seen in patients whose indication for surgery also included concurrent ASD, rather than a diagnosis of pseudarthrosis alone.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T03:31:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4406d606f27f4c51b89aae0ccbf9319b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-5484
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T03:31:12Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series North American Spine Society Journal
spelling doaj.art-4406d606f27f4c51b89aae0ccbf9319b2023-06-24T05:19:20ZengElsevierNorth American Spine Society Journal2666-54842023-06-0114100223Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusionGrant O. Schmidt, MD0Steven D. Glassman, MD1Marko Tomov, MD2John R. Dimar, II, MD3Charles H. Crawford, III, MD4Leah Y. Carreon, MD, MSc5Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray St, Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40204, United StatesNorton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray St, Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40204, United StatesNorton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray St, Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40204, United StatesNorton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray St, Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40204, United StatesNorton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray St, Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40204, United StatesCorresponding author. Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray St, Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40202, USA. Tel.: (502) 584-7525; fax: (502) 589-0849.; Norton Leatherman Spine Center, 210 East Gray St, Suite 900, Louisville, KY 40204, United StatesBackground: Patients with a pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) may have concurrent adjacent segment disease (ASD). Although prior studies have shown posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) is effective in repairing pseudarthrosis, improvement in patient reported outcomes (PROs) has been marginal. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of PCDF in achieving symptom relief in patients with pseudarthrosis after ACDF and whether that is altered by the additional treatment of ASD. Methods: Thirty-two patients with pseudarthrosis were compared with 31 patients with pseudarthrosis and concurrent ASD after ACDF who underwent revision PCDF with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Primary outcomes measures included the neck disability index (NDI), and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores for neck and arm pain. Secondary measures included estimated blood loss (EBL), operating room (OR) time, and length of stay. Results: Demographics between cohorts were similar, however there was a significantly higher mean body mass index (BMI) in the group with concurrent ASD (32.23 vs. 27.76, p=.007). Patients with concurrent ASD had more levels fused during PCDF (3.7 vs. 1.9, p<.001), greater EBL (165 cc vs. 106 cc, p=.054), and longer OR time (256 minutes vs. 202 minutes, p<.000). Preoperative PROs for NDI (56.7 vs. 56.5, p=.954), NRS arm pain (5.9 vs. 5.7, p=.758), and NRS neck pain (6.6 vs. 6.8, p=.726) were similar in both cohorts. At 12 months patients with concurrent ASD experienced a slightly greater, but not statistically significant, improvement in PROs (Δ NDI 4.40 vs. -1.44, Δ NRS neck pain 1.17 vs. 0.42, Δ NRS arm pain 1.28 vs. 0.10, p=.107). Conclusions: PCDF is a standard procedure for treatment of pseudarthrosis following ACDF, however improvements in PROs are marginal. Slightly greater improvements were seen in patients whose indication for surgery also included concurrent ASD, rather than a diagnosis of pseudarthrosis alone.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548423000252PseudarthrosisRevisionCervicalAdjacent segment diseasePosterior cervical decompression and fusionPatient reported outcomes
spellingShingle Grant O. Schmidt, MD
Steven D. Glassman, MD
Marko Tomov, MD
John R. Dimar, II, MD
Charles H. Crawford, III, MD
Leah Y. Carreon, MD, MSc
Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
North American Spine Society Journal
Pseudarthrosis
Revision
Cervical
Adjacent segment disease
Posterior cervical decompression and fusion
Patient reported outcomes
title Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
title_full Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
title_fullStr Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
title_short Comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
title_sort comparison of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis with or without adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
topic Pseudarthrosis
Revision
Cervical
Adjacent segment disease
Posterior cervical decompression and fusion
Patient reported outcomes
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548423000252
work_keys_str_mv AT grantoschmidtmd comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT stevendglassmanmd comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT markotomovmd comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT johnrdimariimd comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT charleshcrawfordiiimd comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion
AT leahycarreonmdmsc comparisonofrevisionsurgeryforpseudarthrosiswithorwithoutadjacentsegmentdiseaseafteranteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusion