Costs of implementing universal test and treat in three correctional facilities in South Africa and Zambia.
<h4>Introduction</h4>Universal test and treat (UTT) is a population-based strategy that aims to ensure widespread HIV testing and rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all who have tested positive regardless of CD4 count to decrease HIV incidence and improve health outcomes. Little is k...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272595 |
| _version_ | 1798032484193009664 |
|---|---|
| author | Rachel Mukora Helene J Smith Michael E Herce Lucy Chimoyi Harry Hausler Katherine L Fielding Salome Charalambous Christopher J Hoffmann |
| author_facet | Rachel Mukora Helene J Smith Michael E Herce Lucy Chimoyi Harry Hausler Katherine L Fielding Salome Charalambous Christopher J Hoffmann |
| author_sort | Rachel Mukora |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Introduction</h4>Universal test and treat (UTT) is a population-based strategy that aims to ensure widespread HIV testing and rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all who have tested positive regardless of CD4 count to decrease HIV incidence and improve health outcomes. Little is known about the specific resources required to implement UTT in correctional facilities for incarcerated people. The primary aim of this study was to describe the resources used to implement UTT and to provide detailed costing to inform UTT scale-up in similar settings.<h4>Methods</h4>The costing study was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in three correctional complexes, Johannesburg Correctional Facility in Johannesburg (>4000 inmates) South Africa, and Brandvlei (~3000 inmates), South Africa and Lusaka Central (~1400 inmates), Zambia. Costing was determined through a survey conducted between September and December 2017 that identified materials and labour used for three separate components of UTT: HIV testing services (HTS), ART initiation, and ART maintenance. Our study participants were staff working in the correctional facilities involved in any activity related to UTT implementation. Unit costs were reported as cost per client served while total costs were reported for all clients seen over a 12-month period.<h4>Results</h4>The cost of HIV testing services (HTS) per client was $ 92.12 at Brandvlei, $ 73.82 at Johannesburg, and $ 65.15 at Lusaka. The largest cost driver for HIV testing at Brandvlei were staff costs at 55.6% of the total cost, while at Johannesburg (56.5%) and Lusaka (86.6%) supplies were the largest contributor. The cost per client initiated on ART was $917 for Brandvlei, $421.8 for Johannesburg, and $252.1 for Lusaka. The activity cost drivers were adherence counselling at Brandvlei (59%), and at Johannesburg and Lusaka it was the actual ART initiation at 75.6% and 75.8%, respectively. The annual unit cost for ART maintenance was $2,640.6 for Brandvlei, $710 for Johannesburg, and $385.5 for Lusaka. The activity cost drivers for all three facilities were side effect monitoring, and initiation of isoniazid preventive treatment (IPT), cotrimoxazole, and fluconazole, with this comprising 44.7% of the total cost at Brandvlei, 88.9% at Johannesburg, and 50.5% at Lusaka.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Given the needs of this population, the opportunity to reach inmates at high risk for HIV, and overall national and global 95-95-95 goals, the UTT policies for incarcerated individuals are of vital importance. Our findings provide comparator costing data and highlight key drivers of UTT cost by facility. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:14:36Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-4409111a39124c0a9645d2b44d580ec1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T20:14:36Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-4409111a39124c0a9645d2b44d580ec12022-12-22T04:05:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01178e027259510.1371/journal.pone.0272595Costs of implementing universal test and treat in three correctional facilities in South Africa and Zambia.Rachel MukoraHelene J SmithMichael E HerceLucy ChimoyiHarry HauslerKatherine L FieldingSalome CharalambousChristopher J Hoffmann<h4>Introduction</h4>Universal test and treat (UTT) is a population-based strategy that aims to ensure widespread HIV testing and rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all who have tested positive regardless of CD4 count to decrease HIV incidence and improve health outcomes. Little is known about the specific resources required to implement UTT in correctional facilities for incarcerated people. The primary aim of this study was to describe the resources used to implement UTT and to provide detailed costing to inform UTT scale-up in similar settings.<h4>Methods</h4>The costing study was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in three correctional complexes, Johannesburg Correctional Facility in Johannesburg (>4000 inmates) South Africa, and Brandvlei (~3000 inmates), South Africa and Lusaka Central (~1400 inmates), Zambia. Costing was determined through a survey conducted between September and December 2017 that identified materials and labour used for three separate components of UTT: HIV testing services (HTS), ART initiation, and ART maintenance. Our study participants were staff working in the correctional facilities involved in any activity related to UTT implementation. Unit costs were reported as cost per client served while total costs were reported for all clients seen over a 12-month period.<h4>Results</h4>The cost of HIV testing services (HTS) per client was $ 92.12 at Brandvlei, $ 73.82 at Johannesburg, and $ 65.15 at Lusaka. The largest cost driver for HIV testing at Brandvlei were staff costs at 55.6% of the total cost, while at Johannesburg (56.5%) and Lusaka (86.6%) supplies were the largest contributor. The cost per client initiated on ART was $917 for Brandvlei, $421.8 for Johannesburg, and $252.1 for Lusaka. The activity cost drivers were adherence counselling at Brandvlei (59%), and at Johannesburg and Lusaka it was the actual ART initiation at 75.6% and 75.8%, respectively. The annual unit cost for ART maintenance was $2,640.6 for Brandvlei, $710 for Johannesburg, and $385.5 for Lusaka. The activity cost drivers for all three facilities were side effect monitoring, and initiation of isoniazid preventive treatment (IPT), cotrimoxazole, and fluconazole, with this comprising 44.7% of the total cost at Brandvlei, 88.9% at Johannesburg, and 50.5% at Lusaka.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Given the needs of this population, the opportunity to reach inmates at high risk for HIV, and overall national and global 95-95-95 goals, the UTT policies for incarcerated individuals are of vital importance. Our findings provide comparator costing data and highlight key drivers of UTT cost by facility.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272595 |
| spellingShingle | Rachel Mukora Helene J Smith Michael E Herce Lucy Chimoyi Harry Hausler Katherine L Fielding Salome Charalambous Christopher J Hoffmann Costs of implementing universal test and treat in three correctional facilities in South Africa and Zambia. PLoS ONE |
| title | Costs of implementing universal test and treat in three correctional facilities in South Africa and Zambia. |
| title_full | Costs of implementing universal test and treat in three correctional facilities in South Africa and Zambia. |
| title_fullStr | Costs of implementing universal test and treat in three correctional facilities in South Africa and Zambia. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Costs of implementing universal test and treat in three correctional facilities in South Africa and Zambia. |
| title_short | Costs of implementing universal test and treat in three correctional facilities in South Africa and Zambia. |
| title_sort | costs of implementing universal test and treat in three correctional facilities in south africa and zambia |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272595 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rachelmukora costsofimplementinguniversaltestandtreatinthreecorrectionalfacilitiesinsouthafricaandzambia AT helenejsmith costsofimplementinguniversaltestandtreatinthreecorrectionalfacilitiesinsouthafricaandzambia AT michaeleherce costsofimplementinguniversaltestandtreatinthreecorrectionalfacilitiesinsouthafricaandzambia AT lucychimoyi costsofimplementinguniversaltestandtreatinthreecorrectionalfacilitiesinsouthafricaandzambia AT harryhausler costsofimplementinguniversaltestandtreatinthreecorrectionalfacilitiesinsouthafricaandzambia AT katherinelfielding costsofimplementinguniversaltestandtreatinthreecorrectionalfacilitiesinsouthafricaandzambia AT salomecharalambous costsofimplementinguniversaltestandtreatinthreecorrectionalfacilitiesinsouthafricaandzambia AT christopherjhoffmann costsofimplementinguniversaltestandtreatinthreecorrectionalfacilitiesinsouthafricaandzambia |