Pathological Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Cancer

Recently, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been employed to avoid unnecessary lymph node dissection, because SLN negativity for carcinoma metastases may imply an extremely low possibility of non-SLN involvement. Pathological evaluation is essential, but standardized procedures have not yet been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takuya Moriya, Shin Usami, Hiroshi Tada, Atsuko Kasajima, Kazuyuki Ishida, Yoshiyuki Kariya, Noriaki Ohuchi, Hironobu Sasano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2004-10-01
Series:Asian Journal of Surgery
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958409600476
_version_ 1818253623780442112
author Takuya Moriya
Shin Usami
Hiroshi Tada
Atsuko Kasajima
Kazuyuki Ishida
Yoshiyuki Kariya
Noriaki Ohuchi
Hironobu Sasano
author_facet Takuya Moriya
Shin Usami
Hiroshi Tada
Atsuko Kasajima
Kazuyuki Ishida
Yoshiyuki Kariya
Noriaki Ohuchi
Hironobu Sasano
author_sort Takuya Moriya
collection DOAJ
description Recently, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been employed to avoid unnecessary lymph node dissection, because SLN negativity for carcinoma metastases may imply an extremely low possibility of non-SLN involvement. Pathological evaluation is essential, but standardized procedures have not yet been determined. Intraoperative consultation, either by frozen section (multiple slices are desirable) or touch imprint cytology, are usually very useful. Their accuracy, however, is variable and depends on the procedures used, but specificity is characteristically 100%, and the missed metastatic focus is always quite minute. After fixation, multiple sections, immuno-histochemistry, and their combination will be able to detect small metastatic foci more frequently. The clinical significance of small or submicro- or occult metastases have not yet been clarified, and further investigations are needed. If the SLN is positive for carcinoma metastases, both the procedure for detection and the size of the metastatic focus should be clarified on the pathological reports.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T16:43:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-44145597adb74c288f0a0027e9dce3ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1015-9584
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T16:43:01Z
publishDate 2004-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Surgery
spelling doaj.art-44145597adb74c288f0a0027e9dce3ff2022-12-22T00:18:32ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Surgery1015-95842004-10-0127425626110.1016/S1015-9584(09)60047-6Pathological Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast CancerTakuya Moriya0Shin Usami1Hiroshi Tada2Atsuko Kasajima3Kazuyuki Ishida4Yoshiyuki Kariya5Noriaki Ohuchi6Hironobu Sasano7Department of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, JapanDepartment of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, JapanDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, JapanDepartment of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, JapanDepartment of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, JapanDepartment of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, JapanDepartment of Surgery, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, JapanDepartment of Pathology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, JapanRecently, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been employed to avoid unnecessary lymph node dissection, because SLN negativity for carcinoma metastases may imply an extremely low possibility of non-SLN involvement. Pathological evaluation is essential, but standardized procedures have not yet been determined. Intraoperative consultation, either by frozen section (multiple slices are desirable) or touch imprint cytology, are usually very useful. Their accuracy, however, is variable and depends on the procedures used, but specificity is characteristically 100%, and the missed metastatic focus is always quite minute. After fixation, multiple sections, immuno-histochemistry, and their combination will be able to detect small metastatic foci more frequently. The clinical significance of small or submicro- or occult metastases have not yet been clarified, and further investigations are needed. If the SLN is positive for carcinoma metastases, both the procedure for detection and the size of the metastatic focus should be clarified on the pathological reports.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958409600476
spellingShingle Takuya Moriya
Shin Usami
Hiroshi Tada
Atsuko Kasajima
Kazuyuki Ishida
Yoshiyuki Kariya
Noriaki Ohuchi
Hironobu Sasano
Pathological Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Cancer
Asian Journal of Surgery
title Pathological Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Cancer
title_full Pathological Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Pathological Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Pathological Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Cancer
title_short Pathological Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Cancer
title_sort pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for breast cancer
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958409600476
work_keys_str_mv AT takuyamoriya pathologicalevaluationofsentinellymphnodesforbreastcancer
AT shinusami pathologicalevaluationofsentinellymphnodesforbreastcancer
AT hiroshitada pathologicalevaluationofsentinellymphnodesforbreastcancer
AT atsukokasajima pathologicalevaluationofsentinellymphnodesforbreastcancer
AT kazuyukiishida pathologicalevaluationofsentinellymphnodesforbreastcancer
AT yoshiyukikariya pathologicalevaluationofsentinellymphnodesforbreastcancer
AT noriakiohuchi pathologicalevaluationofsentinellymphnodesforbreastcancer
AT hironobusasano pathologicalevaluationofsentinellymphnodesforbreastcancer