Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses

Abstract Background Within STEM education, research on instructional practices has focused on ways to increase student engagement and thereby reap the associated benefits of increased learning, persistence, and academic success. These meaningful-learning goals have been tied most specifically to cog...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allyson Barlow, Shane Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-04-01
Series:International Journal of STEM Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-020-00214-7
_version_ 1818033950920015872
author Allyson Barlow
Shane Brown
author_facet Allyson Barlow
Shane Brown
author_sort Allyson Barlow
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Within STEM education, research on instructional practices has focused on ways to increase student engagement and thereby reap the associated benefits of increased learning, persistence, and academic success. These meaningful-learning goals have been tied most specifically to cognitive engagement, a construct that is often difficult for instructors to assess on their own. While it has been shown that certain instructional practices are tied to higher cognitive engagement in students, tools to measure instructional practices and student engagement have remained largely isolated in their development and use. Results This research uses previously developed instruments to simultaneously assess modes of cognitive engagement in students (Student Course Cognitive Engagement Instrument [SCCEI]) and instructional practices (Postsecondary Instructional Practices Survey [PIPS]) within a course. A sample of 19 STEM courses was recruited to participate in this study, with instructors and students each self-reporting data. Results from the instructor and students in each course were scored, and ANOVA and partial correlation analysis were conducted on the sample. ANOVA indicated the significance of and classroom structure on student engagement. From the correlation analysis, a significant relationship was found between four student-reported modes of cognitive engagement and instructor-reported teaching practices. Conclusions With an understanding of student engagement response to classroom structure, instructors may consider their teaching environment when implementing instructional practices. Moreover, Interactivity with Peers, the deepest mode of cognitive engagement suggested by previous research, was correlated with instructional practices in our study, suggesting that instructors may be able to shape their students’ learning by encouraging collaboration in the classroom. We also found that assessment played a role in students’ cognitive engagement; this indicates that instructors may wish to thoughtfully consider their methods of assessment to facilitate modes of cognitive engagement associated with deeper learning of course material. By understanding factor correlations, the PIPS and SCCEI can be used in tandem to understand impacts of instructional practices on student cognitive engagement within a course. We conclude that there is a need for ongoing research to study the interplay of instructional practices and student cognitive engagement as instruments are developed to measure such phenomena.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T06:31:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4427aa9830b04ecc8fb56e305a764ea4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-7822
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T06:31:25Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series International Journal of STEM Education
spelling doaj.art-4427aa9830b04ecc8fb56e305a764ea42022-12-22T01:59:03ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of STEM Education2196-78222020-04-017111510.1186/s40594-020-00214-7Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM coursesAllyson Barlow0Shane Brown1School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State UniversitySchool of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State UniversityAbstract Background Within STEM education, research on instructional practices has focused on ways to increase student engagement and thereby reap the associated benefits of increased learning, persistence, and academic success. These meaningful-learning goals have been tied most specifically to cognitive engagement, a construct that is often difficult for instructors to assess on their own. While it has been shown that certain instructional practices are tied to higher cognitive engagement in students, tools to measure instructional practices and student engagement have remained largely isolated in their development and use. Results This research uses previously developed instruments to simultaneously assess modes of cognitive engagement in students (Student Course Cognitive Engagement Instrument [SCCEI]) and instructional practices (Postsecondary Instructional Practices Survey [PIPS]) within a course. A sample of 19 STEM courses was recruited to participate in this study, with instructors and students each self-reporting data. Results from the instructor and students in each course were scored, and ANOVA and partial correlation analysis were conducted on the sample. ANOVA indicated the significance of and classroom structure on student engagement. From the correlation analysis, a significant relationship was found between four student-reported modes of cognitive engagement and instructor-reported teaching practices. Conclusions With an understanding of student engagement response to classroom structure, instructors may consider their teaching environment when implementing instructional practices. Moreover, Interactivity with Peers, the deepest mode of cognitive engagement suggested by previous research, was correlated with instructional practices in our study, suggesting that instructors may be able to shape their students’ learning by encouraging collaboration in the classroom. We also found that assessment played a role in students’ cognitive engagement; this indicates that instructors may wish to thoughtfully consider their methods of assessment to facilitate modes of cognitive engagement associated with deeper learning of course material. By understanding factor correlations, the PIPS and SCCEI can be used in tandem to understand impacts of instructional practices on student cognitive engagement within a course. We conclude that there is a need for ongoing research to study the interplay of instructional practices and student cognitive engagement as instruments are developed to measure such phenomena.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-020-00214-7Student cognitive engagementInstructional practicesSelf-report measurementPartial correlation analysis
spellingShingle Allyson Barlow
Shane Brown
Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses
International Journal of STEM Education
Student cognitive engagement
Instructional practices
Self-report measurement
Partial correlation analysis
title Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses
title_full Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses
title_fullStr Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses
title_full_unstemmed Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses
title_short Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses
title_sort correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate stem courses
topic Student cognitive engagement
Instructional practices
Self-report measurement
Partial correlation analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-020-00214-7
work_keys_str_mv AT allysonbarlow correlationsbetweenmodesofstudentcognitiveengagementandinstructionalpracticesinundergraduatestemcourses
AT shanebrown correlationsbetweenmodesofstudentcognitiveengagementandinstructionalpracticesinundergraduatestemcourses