From Parody to Rewriting: Margaret Mitchell’s GoneWith the Wind (1936) vs Alice Randall’s The Wind Done Gone (2001)
When after many difficulties, Alice Randall published The Wind Done Gone, the question of the very nature of the novel came to the foreground, from a constitutional as well as a literary standpoint: was it a parodic re-writing of Margaret Mitchell’s Gone With the Wind, and as such protected by the F...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses universitaires de Rennes
2004-10-01
|
| Series: | Revue LISA |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/lisa/2911 |
| _version_ | 1797312970885169152 |
|---|---|
| author | Isabelle Roblin |
| author_facet | Isabelle Roblin |
| author_sort | Isabelle Roblin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | When after many difficulties, Alice Randall published The Wind Done Gone, the question of the very nature of the novel came to the foreground, from a constitutional as well as a literary standpoint: was it a parodic re-writing of Margaret Mitchell’s Gone With the Wind, and as such protected by the First Amendment; or was it just a “steal” of famous characters and situations, and as such submitted to the strict laws of copyright? The analysis of the various literary devices used by the author will show the subversive nature of the hypertext, which goes beyond simple parody. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T02:21:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-44456aec97394f8db1bcfcc8f6cbcfb4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1762-6153 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T02:21:56Z |
| publishDate | 2004-10-01 |
| publisher | Presses universitaires de Rennes |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revue LISA |
| spelling | doaj.art-44456aec97394f8db1bcfcc8f6cbcfb42024-02-13T14:35:08ZengPresses universitaires de RennesRevue LISA1762-61532004-10-01211913110.4000/lisa.2911From Parody to Rewriting: Margaret Mitchell’s GoneWith the Wind (1936) vs Alice Randall’s The Wind Done Gone (2001)Isabelle RoblinWhen after many difficulties, Alice Randall published The Wind Done Gone, the question of the very nature of the novel came to the foreground, from a constitutional as well as a literary standpoint: was it a parodic re-writing of Margaret Mitchell’s Gone With the Wind, and as such protected by the First Amendment; or was it just a “steal” of famous characters and situations, and as such submitted to the strict laws of copyright? The analysis of the various literary devices used by the author will show the subversive nature of the hypertext, which goes beyond simple parody.https://journals.openedition.org/lisa/2911 |
| spellingShingle | Isabelle Roblin From Parody to Rewriting: Margaret Mitchell’s GoneWith the Wind (1936) vs Alice Randall’s The Wind Done Gone (2001) Revue LISA |
| title | From Parody to Rewriting: Margaret Mitchell’s GoneWith the Wind (1936) vs Alice Randall’s The Wind Done Gone (2001) |
| title_full | From Parody to Rewriting: Margaret Mitchell’s GoneWith the Wind (1936) vs Alice Randall’s The Wind Done Gone (2001) |
| title_fullStr | From Parody to Rewriting: Margaret Mitchell’s GoneWith the Wind (1936) vs Alice Randall’s The Wind Done Gone (2001) |
| title_full_unstemmed | From Parody to Rewriting: Margaret Mitchell’s GoneWith the Wind (1936) vs Alice Randall’s The Wind Done Gone (2001) |
| title_short | From Parody to Rewriting: Margaret Mitchell’s GoneWith the Wind (1936) vs Alice Randall’s The Wind Done Gone (2001) |
| title_sort | from parody to rewriting margaret mitchell s gonewith the wind 1936 vs alice randall s the wind done gone 2001 |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/lisa/2911 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT isabelleroblin fromparodytorewritingmargaretmitchellsgonewiththewind1936vsalicerandallsthewinddonegone2001 |