Crowdsourcing and Minority Languages: The Case of Galician Inflected Infinitives1

Results from  a crowdsourced audio questionnaire show that inflected infinitives in Galician are acceptable in a broad range of contexts, different from those described for European Portuguese. Crucially, inflected infinitives with referential subjects are widely accepted only inside strong islands...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle Sheehan, Martin Schäfer, Maria Carmen Parafita Couto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01157/full
_version_ 1823996401920507904
author Michelle Sheehan
Martin Schäfer
Maria Carmen Parafita Couto
author_facet Michelle Sheehan
Martin Schäfer
Maria Carmen Parafita Couto
author_sort Michelle Sheehan
collection DOAJ
description Results from  a crowdsourced audio questionnaire show that inflected infinitives in Galician are acceptable in a broad range of contexts, different from those described for European Portuguese. Crucially, inflected infinitives with referential subjects are widely accepted only inside strong islands in Galician (complements of nouns, adjunct clauses). They are widely rejected in non-islands, notably in the complements of epistemic/factive verbs, in contrast with Portuguese and older varieties of Galician (Gondar, 1978; Raposo, 1987). Statistical analysis shows, however, that, in the complements of epistemic/factive (and desiderative) verbs, inflected infinitives are significantly more acceptable in instances of control, whether partial or exhaustive. In fact, there is no significant difference between these two types of control in Galician, unlike in Portuguese, where inflection is generally better in instances of partial control and is not acceptable in instances of exhaustive local subject control (Modesto, 2010; Sheehan, 2018a). We propose an analysis of this pattern in terms of phase theory. The inflectional domain of non-finite clauses remains visible to the thematic domain of the next clause up, according to the less strict version of the Phase Impenetrability Condition (Chomsky, 2001), allowing control to take place. Pronouns/or pronominal inflections in the inflectional domain of visible non-finite clauses therefore get controlled. In islands, however, material in the inflectional domain remains free/referential. Despite this basic pattern, the data are characterized by substantial interspeaker variation. Statistical analysis shows that gender, urban/rural birthplace and mother tongue are all significant factors in this variation, while age and region of birth are not. Most notably, urban-born male bilinguals with Spanish as their mother tongue consistently rate all sentences higher on the Likert scale. Overall, the results show that crowdsourcing can lead to empirically robust syntactic descriptions of minority languages which are likely to be subject to substantial sociolinguistic variation and where judgments from a single social group may be misrepresentative of the general picture. The study also highlights, however, the challenges associated with using crowdsourced audio-questionnaires of this kind and the need for statistical analysis of results to control for substantial amounts of variation.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T17:02:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4469f4c49cc54c7ba3620ebb47b41baa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T17:02:01Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-4469f4c49cc54c7ba3620ebb47b41baa2022-12-21T21:00:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-06-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.01157452043Crowdsourcing and Minority Languages: The Case of Galician Inflected Infinitives1Michelle Sheehan0Martin Schäfer1Maria Carmen Parafita Couto2School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United KingdomSFB 833: The Construction of Meaning, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, GermanyCenter for Linguistics, Leiden University, Leiden, NetherlandsResults from  a crowdsourced audio questionnaire show that inflected infinitives in Galician are acceptable in a broad range of contexts, different from those described for European Portuguese. Crucially, inflected infinitives with referential subjects are widely accepted only inside strong islands in Galician (complements of nouns, adjunct clauses). They are widely rejected in non-islands, notably in the complements of epistemic/factive verbs, in contrast with Portuguese and older varieties of Galician (Gondar, 1978; Raposo, 1987). Statistical analysis shows, however, that, in the complements of epistemic/factive (and desiderative) verbs, inflected infinitives are significantly more acceptable in instances of control, whether partial or exhaustive. In fact, there is no significant difference between these two types of control in Galician, unlike in Portuguese, where inflection is generally better in instances of partial control and is not acceptable in instances of exhaustive local subject control (Modesto, 2010; Sheehan, 2018a). We propose an analysis of this pattern in terms of phase theory. The inflectional domain of non-finite clauses remains visible to the thematic domain of the next clause up, according to the less strict version of the Phase Impenetrability Condition (Chomsky, 2001), allowing control to take place. Pronouns/or pronominal inflections in the inflectional domain of visible non-finite clauses therefore get controlled. In islands, however, material in the inflectional domain remains free/referential. Despite this basic pattern, the data are characterized by substantial interspeaker variation. Statistical analysis shows that gender, urban/rural birthplace and mother tongue are all significant factors in this variation, while age and region of birth are not. Most notably, urban-born male bilinguals with Spanish as their mother tongue consistently rate all sentences higher on the Likert scale. Overall, the results show that crowdsourcing can lead to empirically robust syntactic descriptions of minority languages which are likely to be subject to substantial sociolinguistic variation and where judgments from a single social group may be misrepresentative of the general picture. The study also highlights, however, the challenges associated with using crowdsourced audio-questionnaires of this kind and the need for statistical analysis of results to control for substantial amounts of variation.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01157/fullinflected infinitivesphasesfinitenesscrowdsourcingsociolinguisticsaudio-questionnaire
spellingShingle Michelle Sheehan
Martin Schäfer
Maria Carmen Parafita Couto
Crowdsourcing and Minority Languages: The Case of Galician Inflected Infinitives1
Frontiers in Psychology
inflected infinitives
phases
finiteness
crowdsourcing
sociolinguistics
audio-questionnaire
title Crowdsourcing and Minority Languages: The Case of Galician Inflected Infinitives1
title_full Crowdsourcing and Minority Languages: The Case of Galician Inflected Infinitives1
title_fullStr Crowdsourcing and Minority Languages: The Case of Galician Inflected Infinitives1
title_full_unstemmed Crowdsourcing and Minority Languages: The Case of Galician Inflected Infinitives1
title_short Crowdsourcing and Minority Languages: The Case of Galician Inflected Infinitives1
title_sort crowdsourcing and minority languages the case of galician inflected infinitives1
topic inflected infinitives
phases
finiteness
crowdsourcing
sociolinguistics
audio-questionnaire
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01157/full
work_keys_str_mv AT michellesheehan crowdsourcingandminoritylanguagesthecaseofgalicianinflectedinfinitives1
AT martinschafer crowdsourcingandminoritylanguagesthecaseofgalicianinflectedinfinitives1
AT mariacarmenparafitacouto crowdsourcingandminoritylanguagesthecaseofgalicianinflectedinfinitives1