Automatic cephalometric analysis: is it time to switch to a hands-free method?
Aim: To evaluate the reliability of the automatic cephalometric analysis in relation to the semi-automatic method. Methods: Fifty lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected and two dental surgeons performed the Steiner and Tweed analyses independently using the semi-automatic method on the Radi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2018-12-01
|
| Series: | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8654178 |
| _version_ | 1818567030448586752 |
|---|---|
| author | Mariane Michels Rodrigo Leitão de Assunção Matheus Lima de Oliveira Marcela Rodrigues Alves Maria Augusta Portella Guedes Visconti Fábio Ribeiro Guedes |
| author_facet | Mariane Michels Rodrigo Leitão de Assunção Matheus Lima de Oliveira Marcela Rodrigues Alves Maria Augusta Portella Guedes Visconti Fábio Ribeiro Guedes |
| author_sort | Mariane Michels |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim: To evaluate the reliability of the automatic cephalometric analysis in relation to the semi-automatic method. Methods: Fifty lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected and two dental surgeons performed the Steiner and Tweed analyses independently using the semi-automatic method on the Radiocef Studio 2® software suite (Radiomemory, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil), and the automatic method on the Kodak Dental Imaging Software (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA). After thirty days, 30% of the sample was re-evaluated to assess intra-observer agreement. Ten angular and linear measurements of both analyses were selected, averaged for both observers and compared using Student's t-test with a significance level of 5% (α=0.05). Intra and inter-observer agreement were assessed through Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. Results: Intra-observer reproducibility was excellent for all measurements and inter-observer reproducibility was excellent for most of them. Significant differences (p<0.05) were found between automatic and semi-automatic methods for all measurements. Most of the measurements were significantly higher (p<0.05) with the automatic method. Conclusion: Semi-automatic cephalometric analysis can not be replaced with a completely automatic method. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T06:18:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-446ccef0bf7c444cbfdde04cfa532f75 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1677-3225 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T06:18:13Z |
| publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
| publisher | Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-446ccef0bf7c444cbfdde04cfa532f752022-12-21T23:13:57ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252018-12-011710.20396/bjos.v17i0.8654178Automatic cephalometric analysis: is it time to switch to a hands-free method?Mariane Michels0Rodrigo Leitão de Assunção1Matheus Lima de Oliveira2Marcela Rodrigues Alves3Maria Augusta Portella Guedes Visconti4Fábio Ribeiro Guedes5State University of CampinasFederal Fluminense UniversityState University of CampinasFaculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de JaneiroFederal University of Rio de JaneiroFederal University of Rio de JaneiroAim: To evaluate the reliability of the automatic cephalometric analysis in relation to the semi-automatic method. Methods: Fifty lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected and two dental surgeons performed the Steiner and Tweed analyses independently using the semi-automatic method on the Radiocef Studio 2® software suite (Radiomemory, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil), and the automatic method on the Kodak Dental Imaging Software (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA). After thirty days, 30% of the sample was re-evaluated to assess intra-observer agreement. Ten angular and linear measurements of both analyses were selected, averaged for both observers and compared using Student's t-test with a significance level of 5% (α=0.05). Intra and inter-observer agreement were assessed through Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. Results: Intra-observer reproducibility was excellent for all measurements and inter-observer reproducibility was excellent for most of them. Significant differences (p<0.05) were found between automatic and semi-automatic methods for all measurements. Most of the measurements were significantly higher (p<0.05) with the automatic method. Conclusion: Semi-automatic cephalometric analysis can not be replaced with a completely automatic method.https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8654178Cephalometry. Software. Benchmarking. |
| spellingShingle | Mariane Michels Rodrigo Leitão de Assunção Matheus Lima de Oliveira Marcela Rodrigues Alves Maria Augusta Portella Guedes Visconti Fábio Ribeiro Guedes Automatic cephalometric analysis: is it time to switch to a hands-free method? Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Cephalometry. Software. Benchmarking. |
| title | Automatic cephalometric analysis: is it time to switch to a hands-free method? |
| title_full | Automatic cephalometric analysis: is it time to switch to a hands-free method? |
| title_fullStr | Automatic cephalometric analysis: is it time to switch to a hands-free method? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Automatic cephalometric analysis: is it time to switch to a hands-free method? |
| title_short | Automatic cephalometric analysis: is it time to switch to a hands-free method? |
| title_sort | automatic cephalometric analysis is it time to switch to a hands free method |
| topic | Cephalometry. Software. Benchmarking. |
| url | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8654178 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marianemichels automaticcephalometricanalysisisittimetoswitchtoahandsfreemethod AT rodrigoleitaodeassuncao automaticcephalometricanalysisisittimetoswitchtoahandsfreemethod AT matheuslimadeoliveira automaticcephalometricanalysisisittimetoswitchtoahandsfreemethod AT marcelarodriguesalves automaticcephalometricanalysisisittimetoswitchtoahandsfreemethod AT mariaaugustaportellaguedesvisconti automaticcephalometricanalysisisittimetoswitchtoahandsfreemethod AT fabioribeiroguedes automaticcephalometricanalysisisittimetoswitchtoahandsfreemethod |