Responsible or reckless? A critical review of the environmental and climate assessments of mineral supply chains

This paper critically reviews and identifies gaps in the methodologies used to analyze the environmental impacts of mineral and metal global supply chains. Of specific focus are assessments of the extraction and production of minerals and metals needed for a low-carbon energy future. Current trends...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jordy Lee, Morgan Bazilian, B Sovacool, S Greene
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9f8c
_version_ 1797747851929845760
author Jordy Lee
Morgan Bazilian
B Sovacool
S Greene
author_facet Jordy Lee
Morgan Bazilian
B Sovacool
S Greene
author_sort Jordy Lee
collection DOAJ
description This paper critically reviews and identifies gaps in the methodologies used to analyze the environmental impacts of mineral and metal global supply chains. Of specific focus are assessments of the extraction and production of minerals and metals needed for a low-carbon energy future. Current trends and projections suggest that the future low-carbon energy system will have greater material needs than the current one. Thus, it is important to better understand the full impacts of increased resource extraction to help ensure a sustainable and just transition. This review reveals that existing methodologies are currently insufficient in capturing the full suite of environmental, social, and governance concerns. The copper supply chain is used as a case study to highlight areas that require refined or augmented methodologies, with an in-depth examination of the corporate practices of Freeport-McMoRan, Vale, and BHP. Together, this review of existing methodologies and examples from the copper supply chain highlight the incomplete and variable nature of environmental and climate reporting within the mining industry. Areas for future work are defined with the goal of advancing accounting frameworks for the mining industry and the associated supply chain.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:56:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-446f7a43b7ef4e53b65a6dff444f8554
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:56:34Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-446f7a43b7ef4e53b65a6dff444f85542023-08-09T14:52:54ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262020-01-01151010300910.1088/1748-9326/ab9f8cResponsible or reckless? A critical review of the environmental and climate assessments of mineral supply chainsJordy Lee0Morgan Bazilian1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1650-8071B Sovacool2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4794-9403S Greene3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-4906The Payne Institute for Public Policy, Colorado School of Mines , 816 15th St. Golden, CO, United States of America; Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.The Payne Institute for Public Policy, Colorado School of Mines , 816 15th St. Golden, CO, United States of America; Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.University of Sussex Business School , Jubilee Building, 9SL, Falmer, Brighton, United KingdomCenter for Transportation & Logistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, United States of AmericaThis paper critically reviews and identifies gaps in the methodologies used to analyze the environmental impacts of mineral and metal global supply chains. Of specific focus are assessments of the extraction and production of minerals and metals needed for a low-carbon energy future. Current trends and projections suggest that the future low-carbon energy system will have greater material needs than the current one. Thus, it is important to better understand the full impacts of increased resource extraction to help ensure a sustainable and just transition. This review reveals that existing methodologies are currently insufficient in capturing the full suite of environmental, social, and governance concerns. The copper supply chain is used as a case study to highlight areas that require refined or augmented methodologies, with an in-depth examination of the corporate practices of Freeport-McMoRan, Vale, and BHP. Together, this review of existing methodologies and examples from the copper supply chain highlight the incomplete and variable nature of environmental and climate reporting within the mining industry. Areas for future work are defined with the goal of advancing accounting frameworks for the mining industry and the associated supply chain.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9f8cdecarbonization pathwaysenvironmental impactssustainabilitymineral supply chainscritical materials security
spellingShingle Jordy Lee
Morgan Bazilian
B Sovacool
S Greene
Responsible or reckless? A critical review of the environmental and climate assessments of mineral supply chains
Environmental Research Letters
decarbonization pathways
environmental impacts
sustainability
mineral supply chains
critical materials security
title Responsible or reckless? A critical review of the environmental and climate assessments of mineral supply chains
title_full Responsible or reckless? A critical review of the environmental and climate assessments of mineral supply chains
title_fullStr Responsible or reckless? A critical review of the environmental and climate assessments of mineral supply chains
title_full_unstemmed Responsible or reckless? A critical review of the environmental and climate assessments of mineral supply chains
title_short Responsible or reckless? A critical review of the environmental and climate assessments of mineral supply chains
title_sort responsible or reckless a critical review of the environmental and climate assessments of mineral supply chains
topic decarbonization pathways
environmental impacts
sustainability
mineral supply chains
critical materials security
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9f8c
work_keys_str_mv AT jordylee responsibleorrecklessacriticalreviewoftheenvironmentalandclimateassessmentsofmineralsupplychains
AT morganbazilian responsibleorrecklessacriticalreviewoftheenvironmentalandclimateassessmentsofmineralsupplychains
AT bsovacool responsibleorrecklessacriticalreviewoftheenvironmentalandclimateassessmentsofmineralsupplychains
AT sgreene responsibleorrecklessacriticalreviewoftheenvironmentalandclimateassessmentsofmineralsupplychains