Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence

On the punishment of murder and limitations of powers of blood heirs in exerting of it , there is disagreement among the Islamic sectarian jurists . The well-known viewpoint in the shiâite jurisprudence is that the punishment of murder initially and essentially is retaliation, and taking the blood-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. Rahiminejad, M. Zaker
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Semnan University 2013-10-01
Series:مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_1904_3d2498dc5e172d44b5a47fbca782630a.pdf
_version_ 1827342192218210304
author E. Rahiminejad
M. Zaker
author_facet E. Rahiminejad
M. Zaker
author_sort E. Rahiminejad
collection DOAJ
description On the punishment of murder and limitations of powers of blood heirs in exerting of it , there is disagreement among the Islamic sectarian jurists . The well-known viewpoint in the shiâite jurisprudence is that the punishment of murder initially and essentially is retaliation, and taking the blood- money requires mutual consent between blood heir and murder. This viewpoint is ,for some, appropriate to the shiâite school and is claimed that they all agree with it, is known as theory of determination incumbency of retaliation. On the contrary, some jurists believe that blood heir has empowered between the retaliation and taking the blood-money, and he can choose one of them. This theory is also called âtheory of selectionâ. This paper has concerned to criticism and investigation of scientific and jurisprudential principles of these theories in the shiâite and sunni jurisprudence, and has concluded that theory of determination incumbency of retaliation on the basis of weakness of theoretical principles, on the one hand , and its bad consequences doesnât enjoy from scientific and practical validity. But theory of selection is based on the firm theoretical backing , and it can better provide the rights of society and blood heirs. Also because of having preferences such as conforming with principle of precaution , consistent with Quranic verses and cause of descent of these verses , it is preceding to the theory of determination incumbency of retaliation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:04:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-44706b16e7514f53b1488404005fe179
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-7012
2717-0330
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:04:08Z
publishDate 2013-10-01
publisher Semnan University
record_format Article
series مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
spelling doaj.art-44706b16e7514f53b1488404005fe1792024-02-23T23:17:07ZfasSemnan Universityمطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی2008-70122717-03302013-10-0159678610.22075/feqh.2017.19041904Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudenceE. RahiminejadM. ZakerOn the punishment of murder and limitations of powers of blood heirs in exerting of it , there is disagreement among the Islamic sectarian jurists . The well-known viewpoint in the shiâite jurisprudence is that the punishment of murder initially and essentially is retaliation, and taking the blood- money requires mutual consent between blood heir and murder. This viewpoint is ,for some, appropriate to the shiâite school and is claimed that they all agree with it, is known as theory of determination incumbency of retaliation. On the contrary, some jurists believe that blood heir has empowered between the retaliation and taking the blood-money, and he can choose one of them. This theory is also called âtheory of selectionâ. This paper has concerned to criticism and investigation of scientific and jurisprudential principles of these theories in the shiâite and sunni jurisprudence, and has concluded that theory of determination incumbency of retaliation on the basis of weakness of theoretical principles, on the one hand , and its bad consequences doesnât enjoy from scientific and practical validity. But theory of selection is based on the firm theoretical backing , and it can better provide the rights of society and blood heirs. Also because of having preferences such as conforming with principle of precaution , consistent with Quranic verses and cause of descent of these verses , it is preceding to the theory of determination incumbency of retaliation.https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_1904_3d2498dc5e172d44b5a47fbca782630a.pdftheory of determination incumbencyretaliationblood-moneymurderblood heirtheory of selection
spellingShingle E. Rahiminejad
M. Zaker
Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence
مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی
theory of determination incumbency
retaliation
blood-money
murder
blood heir
theory of selection
title Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence
title_full Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence
title_fullStr Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence
title_full_unstemmed Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence
title_short Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence
title_sort review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiaite and sunni jurisprudence
topic theory of determination incumbency
retaliation
blood-money
murder
blood heir
theory of selection
url https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_1904_3d2498dc5e172d44b5a47fbca782630a.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT erahiminejad reviewoftheoryofdeterminationincumbencyofretaliationinmurderandcomparingwiththeoryofselectioninshiaiteandsunnijurisprudence
AT mzaker reviewoftheoryofdeterminationincumbencyofretaliationinmurderandcomparingwiththeoryofselectioninshiaiteandsunnijurisprudence