Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence
On the punishment of murder and limitations of powers of blood heirs in exerting of it , there is disagreement among the Islamic sectarian jurists . The well-known viewpoint in the shiâite jurisprudence is that the punishment of murder initially and essentially is retaliation, and taking the blood-...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Semnan University
2013-10-01
|
Series: | مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_1904_3d2498dc5e172d44b5a47fbca782630a.pdf |
_version_ | 1827342192218210304 |
---|---|
author | E. Rahiminejad M. Zaker |
author_facet | E. Rahiminejad M. Zaker |
author_sort | E. Rahiminejad |
collection | DOAJ |
description | On the punishment of murder and limitations of powers of blood heirs in exerting of it , there is disagreement among the Islamic sectarian jurists . The well-known viewpoint in the shiâite jurisprudence is that the punishment of murder initially and essentially is retaliation, and taking the blood- money requires mutual consent between blood heir and murder. This viewpoint is ,for some, appropriate to the shiâite school and is claimed that they all agree with it, is known as theory of determination incumbency of retaliation. On the contrary, some jurists believe that blood heir has empowered between the retaliation and taking the blood-money, and he can choose one of them. This theory is also called âtheory of selectionâ. This paper has concerned to criticism and investigation of scientific and jurisprudential principles of these theories in the shiâite and sunni jurisprudence, and has concluded that theory of determination incumbency of retaliation on the basis of weakness of theoretical principles, on the one hand , and its bad consequences doesnât enjoy from scientific and practical validity. But theory of selection is based on the firm theoretical backing , and it can better provide the rights of society and blood heirs. Also because of having preferences such as conforming with principle of precaution , consistent with Quranic verses and cause of descent of these verses , it is preceding to the theory of determination incumbency of retaliation. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T22:04:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-44706b16e7514f53b1488404005fe179 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2008-7012 2717-0330 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T22:04:08Z |
publishDate | 2013-10-01 |
publisher | Semnan University |
record_format | Article |
series | مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی |
spelling | doaj.art-44706b16e7514f53b1488404005fe1792024-02-23T23:17:07ZfasSemnan Universityمطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی2008-70122717-03302013-10-0159678610.22075/feqh.2017.19041904Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudenceE. RahiminejadM. ZakerOn the punishment of murder and limitations of powers of blood heirs in exerting of it , there is disagreement among the Islamic sectarian jurists . The well-known viewpoint in the shiâite jurisprudence is that the punishment of murder initially and essentially is retaliation, and taking the blood- money requires mutual consent between blood heir and murder. This viewpoint is ,for some, appropriate to the shiâite school and is claimed that they all agree with it, is known as theory of determination incumbency of retaliation. On the contrary, some jurists believe that blood heir has empowered between the retaliation and taking the blood-money, and he can choose one of them. This theory is also called âtheory of selectionâ. This paper has concerned to criticism and investigation of scientific and jurisprudential principles of these theories in the shiâite and sunni jurisprudence, and has concluded that theory of determination incumbency of retaliation on the basis of weakness of theoretical principles, on the one hand , and its bad consequences doesnât enjoy from scientific and practical validity. But theory of selection is based on the firm theoretical backing , and it can better provide the rights of society and blood heirs. Also because of having preferences such as conforming with principle of precaution , consistent with Quranic verses and cause of descent of these verses , it is preceding to the theory of determination incumbency of retaliation.https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_1904_3d2498dc5e172d44b5a47fbca782630a.pdftheory of determination incumbencyretaliationblood-moneymurderblood heirtheory of selection |
spellingShingle | E. Rahiminejad M. Zaker Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی theory of determination incumbency retaliation blood-money murder blood heir theory of selection |
title | Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence |
title_full | Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence |
title_fullStr | Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence |
title_short | Review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiâite and sunni jurisprudence |
title_sort | review of theory of determination incumbency of retaliation in murder and comparing with theory of selection in shiaite and sunni jurisprudence |
topic | theory of determination incumbency retaliation blood-money murder blood heir theory of selection |
url | https://feqh.semnan.ac.ir/article_1904_3d2498dc5e172d44b5a47fbca782630a.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erahiminejad reviewoftheoryofdeterminationincumbencyofretaliationinmurderandcomparingwiththeoryofselectioninshiaiteandsunnijurisprudence AT mzaker reviewoftheoryofdeterminationincumbencyofretaliationinmurderandcomparingwiththeoryofselectioninshiaiteandsunnijurisprudence |