Comparative Analysis of the Online Recruiting Platforms using Utility-related Factors

The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of defining factors which can be used as a measure of the utility of different types of online recruiting platforms and then measure these factors for different such platforms. Three platforms were chosen: freelancer.com, stagiipebune.ro a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel CALIN, Iulia BIVOLARU, Paula IVAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Inforec Association 2016-01-01
Series:Informatică economică
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/78/02%20-%20Calin,%20Bivolaru,%20Ivan.pdf
_version_ 1828341797351325696
author Gabriel CALIN
Iulia BIVOLARU
Paula IVAN
author_facet Gabriel CALIN
Iulia BIVOLARU
Paula IVAN
author_sort Gabriel CALIN
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of defining factors which can be used as a measure of the utility of different types of online recruiting platforms and then measure these factors for different such platforms. Three platforms were chosen: freelancer.com, stagiipebune.ro and hipo.ro. We measured 25 features, which together gave a value for the utility of each platform. Based on these values, it is clear that important features which make a difference nowadays are integration with social media and mobile applications and also the way the information is presented. Information should be easy to follow, but not too scarce.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T23:19:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-44713ddadda549e3896b2789bcee0a51
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1453-1305
1842-8088
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T23:19:23Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Inforec Association
record_format Article
series Informatică economică
spelling doaj.art-44713ddadda549e3896b2789bcee0a512022-12-22T02:25:17ZengInforec AssociationInformatică economică1453-13051842-80882016-01-01202152310.12948/issn14531305/20.2.2016.02Comparative Analysis of the Online Recruiting Platforms using Utility-related FactorsGabriel CALINIulia BIVOLARUPaula IVANThe purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of defining factors which can be used as a measure of the utility of different types of online recruiting platforms and then measure these factors for different such platforms. Three platforms were chosen: freelancer.com, stagiipebune.ro and hipo.ro. We measured 25 features, which together gave a value for the utility of each platform. Based on these values, it is clear that important features which make a difference nowadays are integration with social media and mobile applications and also the way the information is presented. Information should be easy to follow, but not too scarce.http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/78/02%20-%20Calin,%20Bivolaru,%20Ivan.pdfE-RecruitingUtility FactorsComparative AnalysisFeatures
spellingShingle Gabriel CALIN
Iulia BIVOLARU
Paula IVAN
Comparative Analysis of the Online Recruiting Platforms using Utility-related Factors
Informatică economică
E-Recruiting
Utility Factors
Comparative Analysis
Features
title Comparative Analysis of the Online Recruiting Platforms using Utility-related Factors
title_full Comparative Analysis of the Online Recruiting Platforms using Utility-related Factors
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the Online Recruiting Platforms using Utility-related Factors
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the Online Recruiting Platforms using Utility-related Factors
title_short Comparative Analysis of the Online Recruiting Platforms using Utility-related Factors
title_sort comparative analysis of the online recruiting platforms using utility related factors
topic E-Recruiting
Utility Factors
Comparative Analysis
Features
url http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/78/02%20-%20Calin,%20Bivolaru,%20Ivan.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielcalin comparativeanalysisoftheonlinerecruitingplatformsusingutilityrelatedfactors
AT iuliabivolaru comparativeanalysisoftheonlinerecruitingplatformsusingutilityrelatedfactors
AT paulaivan comparativeanalysisoftheonlinerecruitingplatformsusingutilityrelatedfactors