Addressing the management of atrial fibrillation – a systematic review of the role of dronedarone

Gian Marco Podda,1 Giovanni Casazza,2 Francesco Casella,3 Franca Dipaola,4 Emanuela Scannella,3 Ludovica Tagliabue51Medicina III, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; 2Department of Clinical Science, "L. Sacco&quot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Podda GM, Casazza G, Casella F, Dipaola F, Scannella E, Tagliabue L
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2012-05-01
Series:International Journal of General Medicine
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/addressing-the-management-of-atrial-fibrillation-ndash-a-systematic-re-a9976
_version_ 1818517842877743104
author Podda GM
Casazza G
Casella F
Dipaola F
Scannella E
Tagliabue L
author_facet Podda GM
Casazza G
Casella F
Dipaola F
Scannella E
Tagliabue L
author_sort Podda GM
collection DOAJ
description Gian Marco Podda,1 Giovanni Casazza,2 Francesco Casella,3 Franca Dipaola,4 Emanuela Scannella,3 Ludovica Tagliabue51Medicina III, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; 2Department of Clinical Science, "L. Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy; 3Department of Internal Medicine, L. Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy; 4Internal Medicine, Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento Sesto San Giovanni, Italy; 5School of Hygiene and Preventative Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, ItalyBackground: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia. It occurs in 1%–2% of the general population and its prevalence increases with age. Dronedarone, a noniodinated benzofuran similar to amiodarone, was developed as an antiarrhythmic agent for patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of our systematic review was to critically evaluate randomized controlled trials that compared treatment with dronedarone versus placebo or amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation.Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Central) were searched up to November 2011 with no language restrictions. We included randomized controlled trials in which dronedarone was compared to placebo or other drugs in patients with AF. Internal and external validity was assessed.Results: We identified seven papers corresponding to eight randomized controlled trials. The DAFNE, EURIDIS/ADONIS, and ATHENA trials demonstrated a reduction of AF recurrence with dronedarone as compared to placebo in patients with nonpermanent AF. The DIONYSOS study showed that dronedarone is less effective for the prevention of recurrent AF but improved tolerability as compared to amiodarone. Considering patients with permanent AF, the ERATO trial showed that dronedarone had rate-control effects while the PALLAS study was stopped early since stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes were significantly more frequent in subjects treated with dronedarone as compared to placebo. The ANDROMEDA trial included patients with recent hospitalization for heart failure and was terminated early because of excess of deaths in the dronedarone group.Conclusion: Like most antiarrhythmic drugs, dronedarone reduces the recurrence of AF in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF as compared to placebo. However, relapse rates in the first year of therapy are high. Moreover, dronedarone showed to be less effective than amiodarone. Finally, dronedarone should be avoided in patients with permanent AF and a high risk for cardiovascular events or severe congestive heart failure.Keywords: amiodarone, arrhythmia, cardiovascular events
first_indexed 2024-12-11T01:01:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-447fe78bf565478fa52e4eafc0340f5e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-7074
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T01:01:45Z
publishDate 2012-05-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series International Journal of General Medicine
spelling doaj.art-447fe78bf565478fa52e4eafc0340f5e2022-12-22T01:26:18ZengDove Medical PressInternational Journal of General Medicine1178-70742012-05-012012default465478Addressing the management of atrial fibrillation – a systematic review of the role of dronedaronePodda GMCasazza GCasella FDipaola FScannella ETagliabue LGian Marco Podda,1 Giovanni Casazza,2 Francesco Casella,3 Franca Dipaola,4 Emanuela Scannella,3 Ludovica Tagliabue51Medicina III, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; 2Department of Clinical Science, "L. Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy; 3Department of Internal Medicine, L. Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy; 4Internal Medicine, Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento Sesto San Giovanni, Italy; 5School of Hygiene and Preventative Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, ItalyBackground: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia. It occurs in 1%–2% of the general population and its prevalence increases with age. Dronedarone, a noniodinated benzofuran similar to amiodarone, was developed as an antiarrhythmic agent for patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of our systematic review was to critically evaluate randomized controlled trials that compared treatment with dronedarone versus placebo or amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation.Methods: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Central) were searched up to November 2011 with no language restrictions. We included randomized controlled trials in which dronedarone was compared to placebo or other drugs in patients with AF. Internal and external validity was assessed.Results: We identified seven papers corresponding to eight randomized controlled trials. The DAFNE, EURIDIS/ADONIS, and ATHENA trials demonstrated a reduction of AF recurrence with dronedarone as compared to placebo in patients with nonpermanent AF. The DIONYSOS study showed that dronedarone is less effective for the prevention of recurrent AF but improved tolerability as compared to amiodarone. Considering patients with permanent AF, the ERATO trial showed that dronedarone had rate-control effects while the PALLAS study was stopped early since stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes were significantly more frequent in subjects treated with dronedarone as compared to placebo. The ANDROMEDA trial included patients with recent hospitalization for heart failure and was terminated early because of excess of deaths in the dronedarone group.Conclusion: Like most antiarrhythmic drugs, dronedarone reduces the recurrence of AF in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF as compared to placebo. However, relapse rates in the first year of therapy are high. Moreover, dronedarone showed to be less effective than amiodarone. Finally, dronedarone should be avoided in patients with permanent AF and a high risk for cardiovascular events or severe congestive heart failure.Keywords: amiodarone, arrhythmia, cardiovascular eventshttp://www.dovepress.com/addressing-the-management-of-atrial-fibrillation-ndash-a-systematic-re-a9976
spellingShingle Podda GM
Casazza G
Casella F
Dipaola F
Scannella E
Tagliabue L
Addressing the management of atrial fibrillation – a systematic review of the role of dronedarone
International Journal of General Medicine
title Addressing the management of atrial fibrillation – a systematic review of the role of dronedarone
title_full Addressing the management of atrial fibrillation – a systematic review of the role of dronedarone
title_fullStr Addressing the management of atrial fibrillation – a systematic review of the role of dronedarone
title_full_unstemmed Addressing the management of atrial fibrillation – a systematic review of the role of dronedarone
title_short Addressing the management of atrial fibrillation – a systematic review of the role of dronedarone
title_sort addressing the management of atrial fibrillation amp ndash a systematic review of the role of dronedarone
url http://www.dovepress.com/addressing-the-management-of-atrial-fibrillation-ndash-a-systematic-re-a9976
work_keys_str_mv AT poddagm addressingthemanagementofatrialfibrillationampndashasystematicreviewoftheroleofdronedarone
AT casazzag addressingthemanagementofatrialfibrillationampndashasystematicreviewoftheroleofdronedarone
AT casellaf addressingthemanagementofatrialfibrillationampndashasystematicreviewoftheroleofdronedarone
AT dipaolaf addressingthemanagementofatrialfibrillationampndashasystematicreviewoftheroleofdronedarone
AT scannellae addressingthemanagementofatrialfibrillationampndashasystematicreviewoftheroleofdronedarone
AT tagliabuel addressingthemanagementofatrialfibrillationampndashasystematicreviewoftheroleofdronedarone