Estimates of CO<sub>2 </sub>from fires in the United States: implications for carbon management
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fires emit significant amounts of CO<sub>2 </sub>to the atmosphere. These emissions, however, are highly variable in both space and time. Additionally, CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions estimates from fires are very un...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2007-11-01
|
| Series: | Carbon Balance and Management |
| Online Access: | http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/10 |
| _version_ | 1818117359497379840 |
|---|---|
| author | Neff Jason C Wiedinmyer Christine |
| author_facet | Neff Jason C Wiedinmyer Christine |
| author_sort | Neff Jason C |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fires emit significant amounts of CO<sub>2 </sub>to the atmosphere. These emissions, however, are highly variable in both space and time. Additionally, CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions estimates from fires are very uncertain. The combination of high spatial and temporal variability and substantial uncertainty associated with fire CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions can be problematic to efforts to develop remote sensing, monitoring, and inverse modeling techniques to quantify carbon fluxes at the continental scale. Policy and carbon management decisions based on atmospheric sampling/modeling techniques must account for the impact of fire CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions; a task that may prove very difficult for the foreseeable future. This paper addresses the variability of CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions from fires across the US, how these emissions compare to anthropogenic emissions of CO<sub>2 </sub>and Net Primary Productivity, and the potential implications for monitoring programs and policy development.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Average annual CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions from fires in the lower 48 (LOWER48) states from 2002–2006 are estimated to be 213 (± 50 std. dev.) Tg CO<sub>2 </sub>yr<sup>-1 </sup>and 80 (± 89 std. dev.) Tg CO<sub>2 </sub>yr<sup>-1 </sup>in Alaska. These estimates have significant interannual and spatial variability. Needleleaf forests in the Southeastern US and the Western US are the dominant source regions for US fire CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions. Very high emission years typically coincide with droughts, and climatic variability is a major driver of the high interannual and spatial variation in fire emissions. The amount of CO<sub>2 </sub>emitted from fires in the US is equivalent to 4–6% of anthropogenic emissions at the continental scale and, at the state-level, fire emissions of CO<sub>2 </sub>can, in some cases, exceed annual emissions of CO<sub>2 </sub>from fossil fuel usage.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The CO<sub>2 </sub>released from fires, overall, is a small fraction of the estimated average annual Net Primary Productivity and, unlike fossil fuel CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions, the pulsed emissions of CO<sub>2 </sub>during fires are partially counterbalanced by uptake of CO<sub>2 </sub>by regrowing vegetation in the decades following fire. Changes in fire severity and frequency can, however, lead to net changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2 </sub>and the short-term impacts of fire emissions on monitoring, modeling, and carbon management policy are substantial.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T04:37:09Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-44849be397324ba7bed5734a62536856 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1750-0680 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T04:37:09Z |
| publishDate | 2007-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Carbon Balance and Management |
| spelling | doaj.art-44849be397324ba7bed5734a625368562022-12-22T01:20:42ZengBMCCarbon Balance and Management1750-06802007-11-01211010.1186/1750-0680-2-10Estimates of CO<sub>2 </sub>from fires in the United States: implications for carbon managementNeff Jason CWiedinmyer Christine<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fires emit significant amounts of CO<sub>2 </sub>to the atmosphere. These emissions, however, are highly variable in both space and time. Additionally, CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions estimates from fires are very uncertain. The combination of high spatial and temporal variability and substantial uncertainty associated with fire CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions can be problematic to efforts to develop remote sensing, monitoring, and inverse modeling techniques to quantify carbon fluxes at the continental scale. Policy and carbon management decisions based on atmospheric sampling/modeling techniques must account for the impact of fire CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions; a task that may prove very difficult for the foreseeable future. This paper addresses the variability of CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions from fires across the US, how these emissions compare to anthropogenic emissions of CO<sub>2 </sub>and Net Primary Productivity, and the potential implications for monitoring programs and policy development.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Average annual CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions from fires in the lower 48 (LOWER48) states from 2002–2006 are estimated to be 213 (± 50 std. dev.) Tg CO<sub>2 </sub>yr<sup>-1 </sup>and 80 (± 89 std. dev.) Tg CO<sub>2 </sub>yr<sup>-1 </sup>in Alaska. These estimates have significant interannual and spatial variability. Needleleaf forests in the Southeastern US and the Western US are the dominant source regions for US fire CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions. Very high emission years typically coincide with droughts, and climatic variability is a major driver of the high interannual and spatial variation in fire emissions. The amount of CO<sub>2 </sub>emitted from fires in the US is equivalent to 4–6% of anthropogenic emissions at the continental scale and, at the state-level, fire emissions of CO<sub>2 </sub>can, in some cases, exceed annual emissions of CO<sub>2 </sub>from fossil fuel usage.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The CO<sub>2 </sub>released from fires, overall, is a small fraction of the estimated average annual Net Primary Productivity and, unlike fossil fuel CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions, the pulsed emissions of CO<sub>2 </sub>during fires are partially counterbalanced by uptake of CO<sub>2 </sub>by regrowing vegetation in the decades following fire. Changes in fire severity and frequency can, however, lead to net changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2 </sub>and the short-term impacts of fire emissions on monitoring, modeling, and carbon management policy are substantial.</p>http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/10 |
| spellingShingle | Neff Jason C Wiedinmyer Christine Estimates of CO<sub>2 </sub>from fires in the United States: implications for carbon management Carbon Balance and Management |
| title | Estimates of CO<sub>2 </sub>from fires in the United States: implications for carbon management |
| title_full | Estimates of CO<sub>2 </sub>from fires in the United States: implications for carbon management |
| title_fullStr | Estimates of CO<sub>2 </sub>from fires in the United States: implications for carbon management |
| title_full_unstemmed | Estimates of CO<sub>2 </sub>from fires in the United States: implications for carbon management |
| title_short | Estimates of CO<sub>2 </sub>from fires in the United States: implications for carbon management |
| title_sort | estimates of co sub 2 sub from fires in the united states implications for carbon management |
| url | http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/2/1/10 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT neffjasonc estimatesofcosub2subfromfiresintheunitedstatesimplicationsforcarbonmanagement AT wiedinmyerchristine estimatesofcosub2subfromfiresintheunitedstatesimplicationsforcarbonmanagement |