Reviewing Peer Review

Reviewing Peer Review

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Barry London
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Wiley 2021-08-01
Series:	Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:	Editorials peer review scientific publishing
Online Access:	https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.021475

Similar Items

The eLife approach to peer review
by: Randy Schekman, et al.
Published: (2013-04-01)

A new twist on peer review
by: Mark Patterson, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

The changing forms and expectations of peer review
by: S. P. J. M. ( Serge) Horbach, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Making the most of peer review
by: Nikolai Slavov
Published: (2015-11-01)

Peer review at the beginning of the 21st century
by: Irene Hames
Published: (2014-02-01)

Peer review vs Publish all – Navigating the changing landscape of scientific publication
by: Mariette Pretorius
Published: (2024-05-01)

Is there a need for systematic education on peer-reviewing in Serbia?
by: Drvenica Ivana, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Peer Review of Manuscripts: An Online Training Module
by: Latha Chandran, et al.
Published: (2013-06-01)

Modeling peer review: an agent-based approach
by: Stefano Allesina
Published: (2012-09-01)

Peer review without gatekeeping
by: Michael B Eisen, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Why Peer Review?
by: Stewart Brower
Published: (2009-04-01)

Consultative review is worth the wait
by: Stuart RF King
Published: (2017-09-01)

Peer Review in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Call for Developing Responsible Integration Guidelines
by: BaHammam AS
Published: (2025-01-01)

Thank You to Our 2021 Peer Reviewers
by: Noé Lugaz, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

Thank You to Our Peer Reviewers in 2023
by: Noe Lugaz, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)

Thank You to Our 2021 Peer Reviewers
by: Susan Trumbore, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

Thank You to Our 2023 Peer Reviewers
by: Ana Barros, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)

Thank You to Our 2022 Peer Reviewers
by: Susan Trumbore, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Thank You to Our 2022 Peer Reviewers
by: Stephen M. Griffies, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

Thank You to Our 2020 Peer Reviewers
by: Susan Trumbore, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Thank You to Our 2019 Peer Reviewers
by: Gabriel Filippelli, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Thank You to Our 2022 Peer Reviewers
by: Harihar Rajaram, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

Thank You to Our 2023 Peer Reviewers
by: Harihar Rajaram, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01)

How and why eLife selects papers for peer review
by: eLife Editorial Leadership, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01)

A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review [version 3; referees: 2 approved]
by: Jonathan P. Tennant, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Editorial Note of Farewell and Gratitude to ESTS Reviewers
by: Daniel Lee Kleinman, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences? [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Susan Guthrie, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)

Positive bias for European men in peer reviewed applications for faculty position at Karolinska Institutet [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Sarah Holst, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

Personal attributes of authors and reviewers, social bias and the outcomes of peer review: a case study [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5gj]
by: Richard Walker, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01)

The Open Science Peer Review Oath [v1; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/4ou]
by: Jelena Aleksic, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports
by: Ivan Buljan, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Peer review: what are the OBJN responsabilities?
by: Isabel CF da Cruz
Published: (2006-12-01)

The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
by: Stefanie Gregorius, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)

The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation [version 3; referees: 2 approved]
by: Stefanie Gregorius, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Peer-review process in journals dealing with chemistry and related subjects published in Serbia
by: Dekanski Aleksandar, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

A Message to Our 2024 Peer Reviewers: Thank You
by: Advocate Aurora Research Institute
Published: (2025-01-01)

Open access, predatory publishing and peer-review
by: Fernandez-Llimos F
Published: (2014-03-01)

What makes an eLife paper in epidemiology and global health?
by: Mark Jit, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01)

Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5n1]
by: Emily Ford
Published: (2015-07-01)

Peer review and publication delay
by: Fernandez-Llimos F, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)