SOURCES AND DOSES OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPORUS IN NO TILL COMMON BEANS FONTES E DOSES DE NITROGÊNIO E FÓSFORO EM FEIJOEIRO NO SISTEMA PLANTIO DIRETO

SOURCES AND DOSES OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPORUS IN NO TILL COMMON BEANS FONTES E DOSES DE NITROGÊNIO E FÓSFORO EM FEIJOEIRO NO SISTEMA PLANTIO DIRETO

<!-- @page { margin: 2cm } P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm } --> <p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; font-style: normal; line-height: 120%; text-decoration: none;" lang="pt-BR" align="justify"><span style="color: #000000;">&lt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marco Eustáquio de Sá, Orivaldo Arf, Cleiton Gredson Sabin Benett, Marcelo Andreotti, Salatiér Buzetti, Márcio Valderrama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Goiás 2009-09-01
Series:Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical
Subjects:
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
fertilizantes revestidos
Cerrado
Online Access:http://www.revistas.ufg.br/index.php/pat/article/view/4987
_version_ 1818119030675865600
author Marco Eustáquio de Sá
Orivaldo Arf
Cleiton Gredson Sabin Benett
Marcelo Andreotti
Salatiér Buzetti
Márcio Valderrama
author_facet Marco Eustáquio de Sá
Orivaldo Arf
Cleiton Gredson Sabin Benett
Marcelo Andreotti
Salatiér Buzetti
Márcio Valderrama
author_sort Marco Eustáquio de Sá
collection DOAJ
description &lt;!-- @page { margin: 2cm } P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm } --&gt; &lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; font-style: normal; line-height: 120%; text-decoration: none;" lang="pt-BR" align="justify"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of doses and sources of nitrogen and phosphorus, on the production components and grain yield, on irrigated common beans cultivated in a &lt;em&gt;Cerrado&lt;/em&gt; area of Selvíria, Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil (20°22���S, 51°22’W, altitude 335 m). The experimental design was a randomized block, with 4 doses of top-dressed N (0 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 40 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 80 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, and 120 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) and 2 sources (urea and coated urea), and 4 doses of phosphorus (0 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 50 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 100 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, and 150 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; of P&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt;) and 2 sources (triple super phosphate and coated triple super phosphate), at sowing, with 4 repetitions. Nitrogen and phosphorus content in leaves, pod/plant number, grain/plant number, mass of 100 grains, and grain yield were evaluated. The sources of N, as well as the sources of P&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt;, did not differ, as related to the number of pods per plant, grains per plant, mass of 100 grains, and grain yield. The doses of N influenced linearly the leaf N content, as well as the grain yield. The doses of P increased linearly the leaf P content and the grain yield, up to the 120 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; dose.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; font-style: normal; line-height: 120%; text-decoration: none;" lang="pt-BR" align="justify"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;KEY-WORDS: &lt;em&gt;Phaseolus vulgaris&lt;/em&gt; L.; coated fertilizer; &lt;em&gt;Cerrado&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;<br>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- @page { margin: 2cm } P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm } --&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; font-style: normal; line-height: 120%; text-decoration: none;" lang="pt-BR" align="justify"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito de doses e fontes de nitrogênio e fósforo, sobre os componentes de produção, e a produtividade do feijoeiro irrigado, cultivado no inverno, na região de Selvíria, MS (20°22’S, 51°22’W e altitude de 335 metros). O delineamento experimental adotado foi o de blocos casualizados, com 4 doses de N em cobertura (0 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 40 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 80 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; e 120 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) e 2 fontes (uréia e uréia revestida). Para o fósforo, foram 4 doses na semeadura (0 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 50 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 100 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; e 150 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; de P&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt;) e 2 fontes (super fosfato triplo e super fosfato triplo revestido), com 4 repetições. Foram avaliados os teores de nitrogênio e fósforo foliar, número de vagens e grãos planta&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, número de grãos vagem&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, massa de 100 grãos e produtividade de grãos. As fontes de N, bem como as fontes de P&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt;, não diferiram entre si, quanto ao número de vagens por planta, grãos por planta, massa de 100 grãos e produtividade de grãos. As doses de N influenciaram, linearmente, tanto o teor de N foliar, como a produtividade de grãos. As doses de P&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt; aumentaram, linearmente, o teor foliar de P e a produtividade de grãos, até a dose de 120 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; font-style: normal; line-height: 120%; text-decoration: none;" lang="pt-BR" align="justify"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span lang="pt-BR"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: normal;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;PALAVRAS-CHAVE: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span lang="pt-BR"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Phaseolus vulgaris &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span lang="pt-BR"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: normal;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;L.; fertilizantes revestidos; Cerrado.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
first_indexed 2024-12-11T05:03:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-44b7b68fe4cf42dcae4471ad92a31d8f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1983-4063
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T05:03:43Z
publishDate 2009-09-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Goiás
record_format Article
series Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical
spelling doaj.art-44b7b68fe4cf42dcae4471ad92a31d8f2022-12-22T01:20:05ZengUniversidade Federal de GoiásPesquisa Agropecuária Tropical1983-40632009-09-0139319119610.5216/pat.v39i3.4987SOURCES AND DOSES OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPORUS IN NO TILL COMMON BEANS FONTES E DOSES DE NITROGÊNIO E FÓSFORO EM FEIJOEIRO NO SISTEMA PLANTIO DIRETOMarco Eustáquio de SáOrivaldo ArfCleiton Gredson Sabin BenettMarcelo AndreottiSalatiér BuzettiMárcio Valderrama&lt;!-- @page { margin: 2cm } P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm } --&gt; &lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; font-style: normal; line-height: 120%; text-decoration: none;" lang="pt-BR" align="justify"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of doses and sources of nitrogen and phosphorus, on the production components and grain yield, on irrigated common beans cultivated in a &lt;em&gt;Cerrado&lt;/em&gt; area of Selvíria, Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil (20°22���S, 51°22’W, altitude 335 m). The experimental design was a randomized block, with 4 doses of top-dressed N (0 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 40 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 80 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, and 120 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) and 2 sources (urea and coated urea), and 4 doses of phosphorus (0 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 50 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 100 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, and 150 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; of P&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt;) and 2 sources (triple super phosphate and coated triple super phosphate), at sowing, with 4 repetitions. Nitrogen and phosphorus content in leaves, pod/plant number, grain/plant number, mass of 100 grains, and grain yield were evaluated. The sources of N, as well as the sources of P&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt;, did not differ, as related to the number of pods per plant, grains per plant, mass of 100 grains, and grain yield. The doses of N influenced linearly the leaf N content, as well as the grain yield. The doses of P increased linearly the leaf P content and the grain yield, up to the 120 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; dose.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; font-style: normal; line-height: 120%; text-decoration: none;" lang="pt-BR" align="justify"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;KEY-WORDS: &lt;em&gt;Phaseolus vulgaris&lt;/em&gt; L.; coated fertilizer; &lt;em&gt;Cerrado&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;<br>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- @page { margin: 2cm } P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm } --&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; font-style: normal; line-height: 120%; text-decoration: none;" lang="pt-BR" align="justify"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito de doses e fontes de nitrogênio e fósforo, sobre os componentes de produção, e a produtividade do feijoeiro irrigado, cultivado no inverno, na região de Selvíria, MS (20°22’S, 51°22’W e altitude de 335 metros). O delineamento experimental adotado foi o de blocos casualizados, com 4 doses de N em cobertura (0 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 40 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 80 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; e 120 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;) e 2 fontes (uréia e uréia revestida). Para o fósforo, foram 4 doses na semeadura (0 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 50 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, 100 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; e 150 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt; de P&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt;) e 2 fontes (super fosfato triplo e super fosfato triplo revestido), com 4 repetições. Foram avaliados os teores de nitrogênio e fósforo foliar, número de vagens e grãos planta&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, número de grãos vagem&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, massa de 100 grãos e produtividade de grãos. As fontes de N, bem como as fontes de P&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt;, não diferiram entre si, quanto ao número de vagens por planta, grãos por planta, massa de 100 grãos e produtividade de grãos. As doses de N influenciaram, linearmente, tanto o teor de N foliar, como a produtividade de grãos. As doses de P&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;5&lt;/sub&gt; aumentaram, linearmente, o teor foliar de P e a produtividade de grãos, até a dose de 120 kg ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; font-style: normal; line-height: 120%; text-decoration: none;" lang="pt-BR" align="justify"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span lang="pt-BR"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: normal;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;PALAVRAS-CHAVE: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span lang="pt-BR"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span&gt;Phaseolus vulgaris &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000000;"&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: none;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;&lt;span lang="pt-BR"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: normal;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;L.; fertilizantes revestidos; Cerrado.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;http://www.revistas.ufg.br/index.php/pat/article/view/4987Phaseolus vulgaris L.fertilizantes revestidosCerrado
spellingShingle Marco Eustáquio de Sá
Orivaldo Arf
Cleiton Gredson Sabin Benett
Marcelo Andreotti
Salatiér Buzetti
Márcio Valderrama
SOURCES AND DOSES OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPORUS IN NO TILL COMMON BEANS FONTES E DOSES DE NITROGÊNIO E FÓSFORO EM FEIJOEIRO NO SISTEMA PLANTIO DIRETO
Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
fertilizantes revestidos
Cerrado
title SOURCES AND DOSES OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPORUS IN NO TILL COMMON BEANS FONTES E DOSES DE NITROGÊNIO E FÓSFORO EM FEIJOEIRO NO SISTEMA PLANTIO DIRETO
title_full SOURCES AND DOSES OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPORUS IN NO TILL COMMON BEANS FONTES E DOSES DE NITROGÊNIO E FÓSFORO EM FEIJOEIRO NO SISTEMA PLANTIO DIRETO
title_fullStr SOURCES AND DOSES OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPORUS IN NO TILL COMMON BEANS FONTES E DOSES DE NITROGÊNIO E FÓSFORO EM FEIJOEIRO NO SISTEMA PLANTIO DIRETO
title_full_unstemmed SOURCES AND DOSES OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPORUS IN NO TILL COMMON BEANS FONTES E DOSES DE NITROGÊNIO E FÓSFORO EM FEIJOEIRO NO SISTEMA PLANTIO DIRETO
title_short SOURCES AND DOSES OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPORUS IN NO TILL COMMON BEANS FONTES E DOSES DE NITROGÊNIO E FÓSFORO EM FEIJOEIRO NO SISTEMA PLANTIO DIRETO
title_sort sources and doses of nitrogen and phosporus in no till common beans fontes e doses de nitrogenio e fosforo em feijoeiro no sistema plantio direto
topic Phaseolus vulgaris L.
fertilizantes revestidos
Cerrado
url http://www.revistas.ufg.br/index.php/pat/article/view/4987
work_keys_str_mv AT marcoeustaquiodesa sourcesanddosesofnitrogenandphosporusinnotillcommonbeansfontesedosesdenitrogenioefosforoemfeijoeironosistemaplantiodireto
AT orivaldoarf sourcesanddosesofnitrogenandphosporusinnotillcommonbeansfontesedosesdenitrogenioefosforoemfeijoeironosistemaplantiodireto
AT cleitongredsonsabinbenett sourcesanddosesofnitrogenandphosporusinnotillcommonbeansfontesedosesdenitrogenioefosforoemfeijoeironosistemaplantiodireto
AT marceloandreotti sourcesanddosesofnitrogenandphosporusinnotillcommonbeansfontesedosesdenitrogenioefosforoemfeijoeironosistemaplantiodireto
AT salatierbuzetti sourcesanddosesofnitrogenandphosporusinnotillcommonbeansfontesedosesdenitrogenioefosforoemfeijoeironosistemaplantiodireto
AT marciovalderrama sourcesanddosesofnitrogenandphosporusinnotillcommonbeansfontesedosesdenitrogenioefosforoemfeijoeironosistemaplantiodireto

Similar Items