Audio-tactile integration in congenitally and late deaf cochlear implant users.

Several studies conducted in mammals and humans have shown that multisensory processing may be impaired following congenital sensory loss and in particular if no experience is achieved within specific early developmental time windows known as sensitive periods. In this study we investigated whether...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elena Nava, Davide Bottari, Agnes Villwock, Ineke Fengler, Andreas Büchner, Thomas Lenarz, Brigitte Röder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4053428?pdf=render
_version_ 1819153274636337152
author Elena Nava
Davide Bottari
Agnes Villwock
Ineke Fengler
Andreas Büchner
Thomas Lenarz
Brigitte Röder
author_facet Elena Nava
Davide Bottari
Agnes Villwock
Ineke Fengler
Andreas Büchner
Thomas Lenarz
Brigitte Röder
author_sort Elena Nava
collection DOAJ
description Several studies conducted in mammals and humans have shown that multisensory processing may be impaired following congenital sensory loss and in particular if no experience is achieved within specific early developmental time windows known as sensitive periods. In this study we investigated whether basic multisensory abilities are impaired in hearing-restored individuals with deafness acquired at different stages of development. To this aim, we tested congenitally and late deaf cochlear implant (CI) recipients, age-matched with two groups of hearing controls, on an audio-tactile redundancy paradigm, in which reaction times to unimodal and crossmodal redundant signals were measured. Our results showed that both congenitally and late deaf CI recipients were able to integrate audio-tactile stimuli, suggesting that congenital and acquired deafness does not prevent the development and recovery of basic multisensory processing. However, we found that congenitally deaf CI recipients had a lower multisensory gain compared to their matched controls, which may be explained by their faster responses to tactile stimuli. We discuss this finding in the context of reorganisation of the sensory systems following sensory loss and the possibility that these changes cannot be "rewired" through auditory reafferentation.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T15:02:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-44c076d81efb46c7bfc2b440a07db9b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T15:02:35Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-44c076d81efb46c7bfc2b440a07db9b92022-12-21T18:22:04ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0196e9960610.1371/journal.pone.0099606Audio-tactile integration in congenitally and late deaf cochlear implant users.Elena NavaDavide BottariAgnes VillwockIneke FenglerAndreas BüchnerThomas LenarzBrigitte RöderSeveral studies conducted in mammals and humans have shown that multisensory processing may be impaired following congenital sensory loss and in particular if no experience is achieved within specific early developmental time windows known as sensitive periods. In this study we investigated whether basic multisensory abilities are impaired in hearing-restored individuals with deafness acquired at different stages of development. To this aim, we tested congenitally and late deaf cochlear implant (CI) recipients, age-matched with two groups of hearing controls, on an audio-tactile redundancy paradigm, in which reaction times to unimodal and crossmodal redundant signals were measured. Our results showed that both congenitally and late deaf CI recipients were able to integrate audio-tactile stimuli, suggesting that congenital and acquired deafness does not prevent the development and recovery of basic multisensory processing. However, we found that congenitally deaf CI recipients had a lower multisensory gain compared to their matched controls, which may be explained by their faster responses to tactile stimuli. We discuss this finding in the context of reorganisation of the sensory systems following sensory loss and the possibility that these changes cannot be "rewired" through auditory reafferentation.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4053428?pdf=render
spellingShingle Elena Nava
Davide Bottari
Agnes Villwock
Ineke Fengler
Andreas Büchner
Thomas Lenarz
Brigitte Röder
Audio-tactile integration in congenitally and late deaf cochlear implant users.
PLoS ONE
title Audio-tactile integration in congenitally and late deaf cochlear implant users.
title_full Audio-tactile integration in congenitally and late deaf cochlear implant users.
title_fullStr Audio-tactile integration in congenitally and late deaf cochlear implant users.
title_full_unstemmed Audio-tactile integration in congenitally and late deaf cochlear implant users.
title_short Audio-tactile integration in congenitally and late deaf cochlear implant users.
title_sort audio tactile integration in congenitally and late deaf cochlear implant users
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4053428?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT elenanava audiotactileintegrationincongenitallyandlatedeafcochlearimplantusers
AT davidebottari audiotactileintegrationincongenitallyandlatedeafcochlearimplantusers
AT agnesvillwock audiotactileintegrationincongenitallyandlatedeafcochlearimplantusers
AT inekefengler audiotactileintegrationincongenitallyandlatedeafcochlearimplantusers
AT andreasbuchner audiotactileintegrationincongenitallyandlatedeafcochlearimplantusers
AT thomaslenarz audiotactileintegrationincongenitallyandlatedeafcochlearimplantusers
AT brigitteroder audiotactileintegrationincongenitallyandlatedeafcochlearimplantusers