Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized control study based on interim follow-up analysis

Objective To compare the perioperative and postoperative survival outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) in order to provide high-level evidence-based medical evidence for the treatment. Methods From S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIU Jialong, HUANG Deng, CAO Li, WANG Xiaojun, LI Jianwei
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Office of Journal of Third Military Medical University 2019-03-01
Series:Di-san junyi daxue xuebao
Subjects:
Online Access:http://aammt.tmmu.edu.cn/Upload/rhtml/201811005.htm
_version_ 1818877191835877376
author LIU Jialong
HUANG Deng
CAO Li
WANG Xiaojun
LI Jianwei
author_facet LIU Jialong
HUANG Deng
CAO Li
WANG Xiaojun
LI Jianwei
author_sort LIU Jialong
collection DOAJ
description Objective To compare the perioperative and postoperative survival outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) in order to provide high-level evidence-based medical evidence for the treatment. Methods From September 2016 to September 2017, a total of 80 RHCC patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to the LH and RFA groups. A prospective randomized controlled study was used to analyze perioperative factors, overall survival and disease-free survival of patients between the 2 groups, and COX proportional risk model was used to analyze the risk factors for postoperative recurrence. Results According to this interim follow-up analysis, there was no significant difference in the overall survival time between the LH group and the RFA group (19.3±6.8 vs 18.6±6.2 months, P=0.293). The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 92.3% and 89.7% in the LH group and 85.4% and 80.5% in the RFA group. There was statistical significant difference in disease-free survival time between the LH group and the RFA group (16.4±8.5 vs 8.3±7.2 months, P=0.000). The 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival rates were 69.2% and 51.3% in LH group, and 26.8% and 22.0% in RFA group. COX proportional risk model analysis showed that the surgical procedures and preoperative alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level were the risk factors for re-recurrence. Conclusion Our interim follow-up analysis shows that, in selective RHCC patients, LH has a better 2-year disease-free survival rate than RFA.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T13:54:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-44c2459af9734bb5b4516da66b651cd6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1000-5404
language zho
last_indexed 2024-12-19T13:54:22Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Editorial Office of Journal of Third Military Medical University
record_format Article
series Di-san junyi daxue xuebao
spelling doaj.art-44c2459af9734bb5b4516da66b651cd62022-12-21T20:18:38ZzhoEditorial Office of Journal of Third Military Medical UniversityDi-san junyi daxue xuebao1000-54042019-03-0141546747210.16016/j.1000-5404.201811005Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized control study based on interim follow-up analysisLIU Jialong0HUANG Deng1CAO Li2WANG Xiaojun3LI Jianwei4Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China Objective To compare the perioperative and postoperative survival outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) in order to provide high-level evidence-based medical evidence for the treatment. Methods From September 2016 to September 2017, a total of 80 RHCC patients were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to the LH and RFA groups. A prospective randomized controlled study was used to analyze perioperative factors, overall survival and disease-free survival of patients between the 2 groups, and COX proportional risk model was used to analyze the risk factors for postoperative recurrence. Results According to this interim follow-up analysis, there was no significant difference in the overall survival time between the LH group and the RFA group (19.3±6.8 vs 18.6±6.2 months, P=0.293). The 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 92.3% and 89.7% in the LH group and 85.4% and 80.5% in the RFA group. There was statistical significant difference in disease-free survival time between the LH group and the RFA group (16.4±8.5 vs 8.3±7.2 months, P=0.000). The 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival rates were 69.2% and 51.3% in LH group, and 26.8% and 22.0% in RFA group. COX proportional risk model analysis showed that the surgical procedures and preoperative alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level were the risk factors for re-recurrence. Conclusion Our interim follow-up analysis shows that, in selective RHCC patients, LH has a better 2-year disease-free survival rate than RFA.http://aammt.tmmu.edu.cn/Upload/rhtml/201811005.htmlaparoscopyhepatectomyhepatocellular carcinomaradiofrequency ablationrecurrencesurvival rate
spellingShingle LIU Jialong
HUANG Deng
CAO Li
WANG Xiaojun
LI Jianwei
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized control study based on interim follow-up analysis
Di-san junyi daxue xuebao
laparoscopy
hepatectomy
hepatocellular carcinoma
radiofrequency ablation
recurrence
survival rate
title Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized control study based on interim follow-up analysis
title_full Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized control study based on interim follow-up analysis
title_fullStr Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized control study based on interim follow-up analysis
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized control study based on interim follow-up analysis
title_short Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized control study based on interim follow-up analysis
title_sort laparoscopic hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma a prospective randomized control study based on interim follow up analysis
topic laparoscopy
hepatectomy
hepatocellular carcinoma
radiofrequency ablation
recurrence
survival rate
url http://aammt.tmmu.edu.cn/Upload/rhtml/201811005.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT liujialong laparoscopichepatectomyversusradiofrequencyablationintreatmentofrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudybasedoninterimfollowupanalysis
AT huangdeng laparoscopichepatectomyversusradiofrequencyablationintreatmentofrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudybasedoninterimfollowupanalysis
AT caoli laparoscopichepatectomyversusradiofrequencyablationintreatmentofrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudybasedoninterimfollowupanalysis
AT wangxiaojun laparoscopichepatectomyversusradiofrequencyablationintreatmentofrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudybasedoninterimfollowupanalysis
AT lijianwei laparoscopichepatectomyversusradiofrequencyablationintreatmentofrecurrenthepatocellularcarcinomaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolstudybasedoninterimfollowupanalysis