Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate

Geoengineering by injecting sulfur dioxide (SO _2 ) into the lower stratosphere has been suggested to reduce anthropogenically induced warming. While impacts of such geoengineering on climate have been investigated in recent decades, few modeling studies have considered biogeochemical feedbacks resu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng-En Yang, Forrest M Hoffman, Daniel M Ricciuto, Simone Tilmes, Lili Xia, Douglas G MacMartin, Ben Kravitz, Jadwiga H Richter, Michael Mills, Joshua S Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7
_version_ 1797747785295986688
author Cheng-En Yang
Forrest M Hoffman
Daniel M Ricciuto
Simone Tilmes
Lili Xia
Douglas G MacMartin
Ben Kravitz
Jadwiga H Richter
Michael Mills
Joshua S Fu
author_facet Cheng-En Yang
Forrest M Hoffman
Daniel M Ricciuto
Simone Tilmes
Lili Xia
Douglas G MacMartin
Ben Kravitz
Jadwiga H Richter
Michael Mills
Joshua S Fu
author_sort Cheng-En Yang
collection DOAJ
description Geoengineering by injecting sulfur dioxide (SO _2 ) into the lower stratosphere has been suggested to reduce anthropogenically induced warming. While impacts of such geoengineering on climate have been investigated in recent decades, few modeling studies have considered biogeochemical feedbacks resulting from such intervention. This study comprehensively characterizes responses and feedbacks of terrestrial ecosystems, from an ensemble of coupled high-resolution Earth system model climate change simulations, under the highest standard greenhouse gas scenario with an extreme geoengineering mitigation strategy. Under this strategy, temperature increases beyond 2020 levels due to elevated anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO _2 ) were completely offset by the SO _2 injection. Carbon cycle feedbacks can alter the trajectory of atmospheric CO _2 levels by storing or releasing additional carbon on land and in the ocean, thus moderating or amplifying climate change. We assess terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks to climate in response to geoengineering, using model output from the Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS) project. Results indicate terrestrial ecosystems become a stronger carbon sink globally because of lower ecosystem respiration and diminished disturbance effects under geoengineering. An additional 79 Pg C would be stored on land by the end of the twenty-first century, yielding as much as a 4% reduction in atmospheric CO _2 mole fraction without marine biogeochemical feedbacks, compared to the high greenhouse gas scenario without geoengineering.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:55:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-44d11da1373c447196737a1067c85749
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:55:33Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-44d11da1373c447196737a1067c857492023-08-09T14:54:40ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262020-01-01151010404310.1088/1748-9326/abacf7Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climateCheng-En Yang0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4069-4997Forrest M Hoffman1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5802-4134Daniel M Ricciuto2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3668-3021Simone Tilmes3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6557-3569Lili Xia4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7821-9756Douglas G MacMartin5https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1987-9417Ben Kravitz6https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6318-1150Jadwiga H Richter7https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7048-0781Michael Mills8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8054-1346Joshua S Fu9https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-9225Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee , Knoxville, TN 37996, United States of America; Climate Change Science Institute and Computational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory , Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of AmericaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee , Knoxville, TN 37996, United States of America; Climate Change Science Institute and Computational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory , Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of AmericaClimate Change Science Institute and Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory , Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of AmericaAtmospheric Chemistry, Observations, and Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research , Boulder, CO 80307, United States of America; Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research , Boulder, CO 80307, United States of AmericaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States of AmericaSibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University , Ithaca, NY 14853, United States of AmericaDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Indiana University , Bloomington, IN 47405, United States of America; Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory , Richland, WA 99352, United States of AmericaClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research , Boulder, CO 80307, United States of AmericaAtmospheric Chemistry, Observations, and Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research , Boulder, CO 80307, United States of AmericaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee , Knoxville, TN 37996, United States of America; Climate Change Science Institute and Computational Sciences and Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory , Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States of AmericaGeoengineering by injecting sulfur dioxide (SO _2 ) into the lower stratosphere has been suggested to reduce anthropogenically induced warming. While impacts of such geoengineering on climate have been investigated in recent decades, few modeling studies have considered biogeochemical feedbacks resulting from such intervention. This study comprehensively characterizes responses and feedbacks of terrestrial ecosystems, from an ensemble of coupled high-resolution Earth system model climate change simulations, under the highest standard greenhouse gas scenario with an extreme geoengineering mitigation strategy. Under this strategy, temperature increases beyond 2020 levels due to elevated anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO _2 ) were completely offset by the SO _2 injection. Carbon cycle feedbacks can alter the trajectory of atmospheric CO _2 levels by storing or releasing additional carbon on land and in the ocean, thus moderating or amplifying climate change. We assess terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks to climate in response to geoengineering, using model output from the Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS) project. Results indicate terrestrial ecosystems become a stronger carbon sink globally because of lower ecosystem respiration and diminished disturbance effects under geoengineering. An additional 79 Pg C would be stored on land by the end of the twenty-first century, yielding as much as a 4% reduction in atmospheric CO _2 mole fraction without marine biogeochemical feedbacks, compared to the high greenhouse gas scenario without geoengineering.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7geoengineeringcarbon cycleterrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks
spellingShingle Cheng-En Yang
Forrest M Hoffman
Daniel M Ricciuto
Simone Tilmes
Lili Xia
Douglas G MacMartin
Ben Kravitz
Jadwiga H Richter
Michael Mills
Joshua S Fu
Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate
Environmental Research Letters
geoengineering
carbon cycle
terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks
title Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate
title_full Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate
title_fullStr Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate
title_full_unstemmed Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate
title_short Assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate
title_sort assessing terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in a strategically geoengineered climate
topic geoengineering
carbon cycle
terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abacf7
work_keys_str_mv AT chengenyang assessingterrestrialbiogeochemicalfeedbacksinastrategicallygeoengineeredclimate
AT forrestmhoffman assessingterrestrialbiogeochemicalfeedbacksinastrategicallygeoengineeredclimate
AT danielmricciuto assessingterrestrialbiogeochemicalfeedbacksinastrategicallygeoengineeredclimate
AT simonetilmes assessingterrestrialbiogeochemicalfeedbacksinastrategicallygeoengineeredclimate
AT lilixia assessingterrestrialbiogeochemicalfeedbacksinastrategicallygeoengineeredclimate
AT douglasgmacmartin assessingterrestrialbiogeochemicalfeedbacksinastrategicallygeoengineeredclimate
AT benkravitz assessingterrestrialbiogeochemicalfeedbacksinastrategicallygeoengineeredclimate
AT jadwigahrichter assessingterrestrialbiogeochemicalfeedbacksinastrategicallygeoengineeredclimate
AT michaelmills assessingterrestrialbiogeochemicalfeedbacksinastrategicallygeoengineeredclimate
AT joshuasfu assessingterrestrialbiogeochemicalfeedbacksinastrategicallygeoengineeredclimate