Wohlrapp on the Criterial Side of Validity: Some Comments
bstract: Harald Wohlrapp’s The Concept of Argument has made a significant contribution to the argumentation theory by proposing a new approach to our way of thinking about arguments and argumentation that in which he proposes a criterion of criterial validity: An thesis is valid, if there are no ope...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Windsor
2017-09-01
|
| Series: | Informal Logic |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4831 |
| _version_ | 1828531379991740416 |
|---|---|
| author | Ralph H. Johnson |
| author_facet | Ralph H. Johnson |
| author_sort | Ralph H. Johnson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | bstract: Harald Wohlrapp’s The Concept of Argument has made a significant contribution to the argumentation theory by proposing a new approach to our way of thinking about arguments and argumentation that in which he proposes a criterion of criterial validity: An thesis is valid, if there are no open objections against the justification offered for it. In this paper, I will focus on some issues and difficulties with that principle. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T22:36:50Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-44e7010fe37c4662ad193b753c477a42 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0824-2577 0824-2577 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T22:36:50Z |
| publishDate | 2017-09-01 |
| publisher | University of Windsor |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Informal Logic |
| spelling | doaj.art-44e7010fe37c4662ad193b753c477a422022-12-22T00:47:56ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25770824-25772017-09-0137322322910.22329/il.v37i3.48313799Wohlrapp on the Criterial Side of Validity: Some CommentsRalph H. Johnson0CRRAR, University of Windsor, Ontariobstract: Harald Wohlrapp’s The Concept of Argument has made a significant contribution to the argumentation theory by proposing a new approach to our way of thinking about arguments and argumentation that in which he proposes a criterion of criterial validity: An thesis is valid, if there are no open objections against the justification offered for it. In this paper, I will focus on some issues and difficulties with that principle.https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4831objection, criterial validity, |
| spellingShingle | Ralph H. Johnson Wohlrapp on the Criterial Side of Validity: Some Comments Informal Logic objection, criterial validity, |
| title | Wohlrapp on the Criterial Side of Validity: Some Comments |
| title_full | Wohlrapp on the Criterial Side of Validity: Some Comments |
| title_fullStr | Wohlrapp on the Criterial Side of Validity: Some Comments |
| title_full_unstemmed | Wohlrapp on the Criterial Side of Validity: Some Comments |
| title_short | Wohlrapp on the Criterial Side of Validity: Some Comments |
| title_sort | wohlrapp on the criterial side of validity some comments |
| topic | objection, criterial validity, |
| url | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4831 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ralphhjohnson wohlrapponthecriterialsideofvaliditysomecomments |