Stimulus contrast and retinogeniculate signal processing

Neuronal signals conveying luminance contrast play a key role in nearly all aspects of perception, including depth perception, texture discrimination, and motion perception. Although much is known about the retinal mechanisms responsible for encoding contrast information, relatively little is known...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Llewellyn Rathbun, Henry Joseph Alitto, David K. Warland, W. Martin eUsrey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Neural Circuits
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2016.00008/full
_version_ 1811302296649203712
author Daniel Llewellyn Rathbun
Daniel Llewellyn Rathbun
Henry Joseph Alitto
Henry Joseph Alitto
David K. Warland
David K. Warland
W. Martin eUsrey
W. Martin eUsrey
author_facet Daniel Llewellyn Rathbun
Daniel Llewellyn Rathbun
Henry Joseph Alitto
Henry Joseph Alitto
David K. Warland
David K. Warland
W. Martin eUsrey
W. Martin eUsrey
author_sort Daniel Llewellyn Rathbun
collection DOAJ
description Neuronal signals conveying luminance contrast play a key role in nearly all aspects of perception, including depth perception, texture discrimination, and motion perception. Although much is known about the retinal mechanisms responsible for encoding contrast information, relatively little is known about the relationship between stimulus contrast and the processing of neuronal signals between visual structures. Here we describe simultaneous recordings from monosynaptically connected retinal ganglion cells and lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) neurons in the cat to determine how stimulus contrast affects the communication of visual signals between the two structures. Our results indicate that 1) LGN neurons typically reach their half-maximal response at lower contrasts than their individual retinal inputs, and 2) LGN neurons exhibit greater contrast-dependent phase advance (CDPA) than their retinal inputs. Further analyses suggests that increased sensitivity relies on spatial convergence of multiple retinal inputs, while increased CDPA is achieved, in part, on temporal summation of arriving signals.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:25:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-44e893f8978e48b0bc43931b2ee04369
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5110
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:25:42Z
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neural Circuits
spelling doaj.art-44e893f8978e48b0bc43931b2ee043692022-12-22T02:56:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neural Circuits1662-51102016-02-011010.3389/fncir.2016.00008175669Stimulus contrast and retinogeniculate signal processingDaniel Llewellyn Rathbun0Daniel Llewellyn Rathbun1Henry Joseph Alitto2Henry Joseph Alitto3David K. Warland4David K. Warland5W. Martin eUsrey6W. Martin eUsrey7University of California, DavisInstitute for Ophthalmology and Center for Integrative NeuroscienceUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of California, DavisUniversity of California, DavisNeuronal signals conveying luminance contrast play a key role in nearly all aspects of perception, including depth perception, texture discrimination, and motion perception. Although much is known about the retinal mechanisms responsible for encoding contrast information, relatively little is known about the relationship between stimulus contrast and the processing of neuronal signals between visual structures. Here we describe simultaneous recordings from monosynaptically connected retinal ganglion cells and lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) neurons in the cat to determine how stimulus contrast affects the communication of visual signals between the two structures. Our results indicate that 1) LGN neurons typically reach their half-maximal response at lower contrasts than their individual retinal inputs, and 2) LGN neurons exhibit greater contrast-dependent phase advance (CDPA) than their retinal inputs. Further analyses suggests that increased sensitivity relies on spatial convergence of multiple retinal inputs, while increased CDPA is achieved, in part, on temporal summation of arriving signals.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2016.00008/fullRetinaThalamusVisioncodingLGN
spellingShingle Daniel Llewellyn Rathbun
Daniel Llewellyn Rathbun
Henry Joseph Alitto
Henry Joseph Alitto
David K. Warland
David K. Warland
W. Martin eUsrey
W. Martin eUsrey
Stimulus contrast and retinogeniculate signal processing
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
Retina
Thalamus
Vision
coding
LGN
title Stimulus contrast and retinogeniculate signal processing
title_full Stimulus contrast and retinogeniculate signal processing
title_fullStr Stimulus contrast and retinogeniculate signal processing
title_full_unstemmed Stimulus contrast and retinogeniculate signal processing
title_short Stimulus contrast and retinogeniculate signal processing
title_sort stimulus contrast and retinogeniculate signal processing
topic Retina
Thalamus
Vision
coding
LGN
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2016.00008/full
work_keys_str_mv AT danielllewellynrathbun stimuluscontrastandretinogeniculatesignalprocessing
AT danielllewellynrathbun stimuluscontrastandretinogeniculatesignalprocessing
AT henryjosephalitto stimuluscontrastandretinogeniculatesignalprocessing
AT henryjosephalitto stimuluscontrastandretinogeniculatesignalprocessing
AT davidkwarland stimuluscontrastandretinogeniculatesignalprocessing
AT davidkwarland stimuluscontrastandretinogeniculatesignalprocessing
AT wmartineusrey stimuluscontrastandretinogeniculatesignalprocessing
AT wmartineusrey stimuluscontrastandretinogeniculatesignalprocessing