Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol

Stakeholder views regarding ethical issues in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: study protocol

Abstract Background Randomized controlled trial (RCT) trial designs exist on an explanatory-pragmatic spectrum, depending on the degree to which a study aims to address a question of efficacy or effectiveness. As conceptualized by Schwartz and Lellouch in 1967, an explanatory approach to trial desig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Stuart G. Nicholls, Kelly Carroll, Jamie Brehaut, Charles Weijer, Spencer Phillips Hey, Cory E. Goldstein, Merrick Zwarenstein, Ian D. Graham, Joanne E. McKenzie, Lauralyn McIntyre, Vipul Jairath, Marion K. Campbell, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Dean A. Fergusson, Monica Taljaard
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	BMC 2018-11-01
Series:	BMC Medical Ethics
Online Access:	http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12910-018-0332-z

Similar Items

The ethical challenges raised in the design and conduct of pragmatic trials: an interview study with key stakeholders
by: Stuart G. Nicholls, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Patient Partner Perspectives Regarding Ethically and Clinically Important Aspects of Trial Design in Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials for Hemodialysis
by: Stuart G. Nicholls, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol
by: Monica Taljaard, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
by: Bruno Giraudeau, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Ethical considerations within pragmatic randomized controlled trials in dementia: Results from a literature survey
by: Stuart G. Nicholls, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles
by: Cory E. Goldstein, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability
by: Treweek Shaun, et al.
Published: (2009-06-01)

Researchers’ perceptions of ethical challenges in cluster randomized trials: a qualitative analysis
by: McRae Andrew D, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Does clinical equipoise apply to cluster randomized trials in health research?
by: Brehaut Jamie C, et al.
Published: (2011-05-01)

Audit and feedback to improve laboratory test and transfusion ordering in critical care: a systematic review
by: Madison Foster, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

What is the role and authority of gatekeepers in cluster randomized trials in health research?
by: Gallo Antonio, et al.
Published: (2012-07-01)

Who is the research subject in cluster randomized trials in health research?
by: Brehaut Jamie C, et al.
Published: (2011-07-01)

Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research
by: Donner Allan, et al.
Published: (2011-04-01)

The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials.
by: Weijer, C, et al.
Published: (2012)

Does clinical equipoise apply to cluster randomized trials in health research?
by: Binik, A, et al.
Published: (2011)

Reporting of and explanations for under-recruitment and over-recruitment in pragmatic trials: a secondary analysis of a database of primary trial reports published from 2014 to 2019
by: Karla Hemming, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

How well do critical care audit and feedback interventions adhere to best practice? Development and application of the REFLECT-52 evaluation tool
by: Madison Foster, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)

Who is the research subject in cluster randomized trials in health research?
by: McRae, A, et al.
Published: (2011)

Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research.
by: Weijer, C, et al.
Published: (2011)

Ethical and policy issues in cluster randomized trials: rationale and design of a mixed methods research study
by: Chaudhry Shazia H, et al.
Published: (2009-07-01)

Ethical and policy issues in cluster randomized trials: rationale and design of a mixed methods research study.
by: Taljaard, M, et al.
Published: (2009)

FLUID trial: a hospital-wide open-label cluster cross-over pragmatic comparative effectiveness randomised pilot trial comparing normal saline to Ringer’s lactate
by: John Marshall, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)

A Scoping Review of Empirical Research Relating to Quality and Effectiveness of Research Ethics Review.
by: Stuart G Nicholls, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Patient-reported outcomes and target effect sizes in pragmatic randomized trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional analysis
by: Vanderhout, S, et al.
Published: (2022)

Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: a guide for the perplexed
by: Charles Weijer, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Effectiveness of a group diabetes education programme in underserved communities in South Africa: pragmatic cluster randomized control trial
by: Mash Bob, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01)

A Hospital-Wide Open-Label Cluster Crossover Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Trial Comparing Normal Saline to Ringer’s Lactate: Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan of The FLUID Trial
by: Julia F Shaw, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

When is informed consent required in cluster randomized trials in health research?
by: McRae, A, et al.
Published: (2011)

Describing the content of trial recruitment interventions using the TIDieR reporting checklist: a systematic methodology review
by: Natasha Hudek, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01)

Changing patient preferences toward better trial recruitment: an ethical analysis
by: Pepijn Al, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials.
by: Charles Weijer, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

Health equity considerations in pragmatic trials in Alzheimer's and dementia disease: Results from a methodological review
by: Stuart G. Nicholls, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Comparison of six statistical methods for interrupted time series studies: empirical evaluation of 190 published series
by: Simon L. Turner, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Comparison of crystalloid resuscitation fluids for treatment of acute brain injury: a clinical and pre-clinical systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
by: Mary Thompson, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

When is informed consent required in cluster randomized trials in health research?
by: Boruch Robert, et al.
Published: (2011-09-01)

Effect of an educational toolkit on quality of care: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial.
by: Baiju R Shah, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01)

Electronic search strategies to identify reports of cluster randomized trials in MEDLINE: low precision will improve with adherence to reporting standards
by: Grimshaw Jeremy M, et al.
Published: (2010-02-01)

Choice of crystalloid fluid in the treatment of hyperglycemic emergencies: a systematic review protocol
by: Benjamin Gershkovich, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)

Printed educational materials directed at Ontario family physicians do not improve adherence to guideline recommendations for diabetes management: a pragmatic, factorial, cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN72772651]
by: Alison H. Howie, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)

On Canaries, Icebergs and the public sphere: The pragmatic compromise of religious pluralism
by: Mike Grimshaw
Published: (2023-01-01)