Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To assess the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect of communication training with peer role play (RP) and standardised patients (SP).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>69 prefinal year stude...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schultz Jobst H, Jünger Jana, Huwendiek Sören, Nickel Martin, Bosse Hans M, Nikendei Christoph
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-03-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/27
_version_ 1818347155514982400
author Schultz Jobst H
Jünger Jana
Huwendiek Sören
Nickel Martin
Bosse Hans M
Nikendei Christoph
author_facet Schultz Jobst H
Jünger Jana
Huwendiek Sören
Nickel Martin
Bosse Hans M
Nikendei Christoph
author_sort Schultz Jobst H
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To assess the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect of communication training with peer role play (RP) and standardised patients (SP).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>69 prefinal year students from a large German medical faculty were randomly assigned to one of two groups receiving communication training with RP (N = 34) or SP (N = 35) in the course of their paediatric rotation. In both groups, training addressed major medical and communication problems encountered in the exploration and counselling of parents of sick children. Acceptability and realism of the training as well as perceived effects and applicability for future parent-physician encounters were assessed using six-point Likert scales.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Both forms of training were highly accepted (RP 5.32 ± .41, SP 5.51 ± .44, n.s.; 6 = very good, 1 = very poor) and perceived to be highly realistic (RP 5.60 ± .38, SP 5.53 ± .36, n.s.; 6 = highly realistic, 1 = unrealistic). Regarding perceived effects, participation was seen to be significantly more worthwhile in the SP group (RP 5.17 ± .37, SP 5.50 ± .43; p < .003; 6 = totally agree, 1 = don't agree at all). Both training methods were perceived as useful for training communication skills (RP 5.01 ± .68, SP 5.34 ± .47; 6 = totally agree; 1 = don't agree at all) and were considered to be moderately applicable for future parent-physician encounters (RP 4.29 ± 1.08, SP 5.00 ± .89; 6 = well prepared, 1 = unprepared), with usefulness and applicability both being rated higher in the SP group (p < .032 and p < .009).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>RP and SP represent comparably valuable tools for the training of specific communication skills from the student perspective. Both provide highly realistic training scenarios and warrant inclusion in medical curricula. Given the expense of SP, deciding which method to employ should be carefully weighed up. From the perspective of the students in our study, SP were seen as a more useful and more applicable tool than RP. We discuss the potential of RP to foster a greater empathic appreciation of the patient perspective.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-13T17:29:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-450a28708ae042ef89698445c1aaa075
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6920
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T17:29:40Z
publishDate 2010-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Education
spelling doaj.art-450a28708ae042ef89698445c1aaa0752022-12-21T23:37:06ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202010-03-011012710.1186/1472-6920-10-27Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effectSchultz Jobst HJünger JanaHuwendiek SörenNickel MartinBosse Hans MNikendei Christoph<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To assess the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect of communication training with peer role play (RP) and standardised patients (SP).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>69 prefinal year students from a large German medical faculty were randomly assigned to one of two groups receiving communication training with RP (N = 34) or SP (N = 35) in the course of their paediatric rotation. In both groups, training addressed major medical and communication problems encountered in the exploration and counselling of parents of sick children. Acceptability and realism of the training as well as perceived effects and applicability for future parent-physician encounters were assessed using six-point Likert scales.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Both forms of training were highly accepted (RP 5.32 ± .41, SP 5.51 ± .44, n.s.; 6 = very good, 1 = very poor) and perceived to be highly realistic (RP 5.60 ± .38, SP 5.53 ± .36, n.s.; 6 = highly realistic, 1 = unrealistic). Regarding perceived effects, participation was seen to be significantly more worthwhile in the SP group (RP 5.17 ± .37, SP 5.50 ± .43; p < .003; 6 = totally agree, 1 = don't agree at all). Both training methods were perceived as useful for training communication skills (RP 5.01 ± .68, SP 5.34 ± .47; 6 = totally agree; 1 = don't agree at all) and were considered to be moderately applicable for future parent-physician encounters (RP 4.29 ± 1.08, SP 5.00 ± .89; 6 = well prepared, 1 = unprepared), with usefulness and applicability both being rated higher in the SP group (p < .032 and p < .009).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>RP and SP represent comparably valuable tools for the training of specific communication skills from the student perspective. Both provide highly realistic training scenarios and warrant inclusion in medical curricula. Given the expense of SP, deciding which method to employ should be carefully weighed up. From the perspective of the students in our study, SP were seen as a more useful and more applicable tool than RP. We discuss the potential of RP to foster a greater empathic appreciation of the patient perspective.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/27
spellingShingle Schultz Jobst H
Jünger Jana
Huwendiek Sören
Nickel Martin
Bosse Hans M
Nikendei Christoph
Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect
BMC Medical Education
title Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect
title_full Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect
title_fullStr Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect
title_full_unstemmed Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect
title_short Peer role-play and standardised patients in communication training: a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability, realism, and perceived effect
title_sort peer role play and standardised patients in communication training a comparative study on the student perspective on acceptability realism and perceived effect
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/10/27
work_keys_str_mv AT schultzjobsth peerroleplayandstandardisedpatientsincommunicationtrainingacomparativestudyonthestudentperspectiveonacceptabilityrealismandperceivedeffect
AT jungerjana peerroleplayandstandardisedpatientsincommunicationtrainingacomparativestudyonthestudentperspectiveonacceptabilityrealismandperceivedeffect
AT huwendieksoren peerroleplayandstandardisedpatientsincommunicationtrainingacomparativestudyonthestudentperspectiveonacceptabilityrealismandperceivedeffect
AT nickelmartin peerroleplayandstandardisedpatientsincommunicationtrainingacomparativestudyonthestudentperspectiveonacceptabilityrealismandperceivedeffect
AT bossehansm peerroleplayandstandardisedpatientsincommunicationtrainingacomparativestudyonthestudentperspectiveonacceptabilityrealismandperceivedeffect
AT nikendeichristoph peerroleplayandstandardisedpatientsincommunicationtrainingacomparativestudyonthestudentperspectiveonacceptabilityrealismandperceivedeffect