Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer

Abstract Background The types of outcomes measured collected in clinical studies and those required for cost-effectiveness analysis often differ. Decision makers routinely use quality adjusted life years (QALYs) to compare the benefits and costs of treatments across different diseases and treatments...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura A. Gray, Monica Hernandez Alava, Allan J. Wailoo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-11-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08964-5
_version_ 1818345135364112384
author Laura A. Gray
Monica Hernandez Alava
Allan J. Wailoo
author_facet Laura A. Gray
Monica Hernandez Alava
Allan J. Wailoo
author_sort Laura A. Gray
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The types of outcomes measured collected in clinical studies and those required for cost-effectiveness analysis often differ. Decision makers routinely use quality adjusted life years (QALYs) to compare the benefits and costs of treatments across different diseases and treatments using a common metric. QALYs can be calculated using preference-based measures (PBMs) such as EQ-5D-3L, but clinical studies often focus on objective clinician or laboratory measured outcomes and non-preference-based patient outcomes, such as QLQ-C30. We model the relationship between the generic, preference-based EQ-5D-3L and the cancer specific quality of life questionnaire, QLQ-C30 in patients with breast cancer. This will result in a mapping that allows users to convert QLQ-C30 scores into EQ-5D-3L scores for the purposes of cost-effectiveness analysis or economic evaluation. Methods We use data from a randomized trial of 602 patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer provided 3766 EQ-5D-3L observations. Direct mapping using adjusted, limited dependent variable mixture models (ALDVMM) is compared to a random effects linear regression and indirect mapping using seemingly unrelated ordered probit models. EQ-5D-3L was estimated as a function of the summary scales of the QLQ-C30 and other patient characteristics. Results A four component mixture model outperformed other models in terms of summary fit statistics. A close fit to the observed data was observed across the range of disease severity. Simulated data from the model closely aligned to the original data and showed that mapping did not significantly underestimate uncertainty. In the simulated data, 22.15% were equal to 1 compared to 21.93% in the original data. Variance was 0.0628 in the simulated data versus 0.0693 in the original data. The preferred mapping is provided in Excel and Stata files for the ease of users. Conclusion A four component adjusted mixture model provides reliable, non-biased estimates of EQ-5D-3L from the QLQ-C30, to link clinical studies to economic evaluation of health technologies for breast cancer. This work adds to a growing body of literature demonstrating the appropriateness of mixture model based approaches in mapping.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T16:57:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-45189f29fd5d41dfb4a1065fe8a3e5c4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T16:57:33Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj.art-45189f29fd5d41dfb4a1065fe8a3e5c42022-12-21T23:37:53ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072021-11-0121111010.1186/s12885-021-08964-5Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancerLaura A. Gray0Monica Hernandez Alava1Allan J. Wailoo2Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of SheffieldHealth Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of SheffieldHealth Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of SheffieldAbstract Background The types of outcomes measured collected in clinical studies and those required for cost-effectiveness analysis often differ. Decision makers routinely use quality adjusted life years (QALYs) to compare the benefits and costs of treatments across different diseases and treatments using a common metric. QALYs can be calculated using preference-based measures (PBMs) such as EQ-5D-3L, but clinical studies often focus on objective clinician or laboratory measured outcomes and non-preference-based patient outcomes, such as QLQ-C30. We model the relationship between the generic, preference-based EQ-5D-3L and the cancer specific quality of life questionnaire, QLQ-C30 in patients with breast cancer. This will result in a mapping that allows users to convert QLQ-C30 scores into EQ-5D-3L scores for the purposes of cost-effectiveness analysis or economic evaluation. Methods We use data from a randomized trial of 602 patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer provided 3766 EQ-5D-3L observations. Direct mapping using adjusted, limited dependent variable mixture models (ALDVMM) is compared to a random effects linear regression and indirect mapping using seemingly unrelated ordered probit models. EQ-5D-3L was estimated as a function of the summary scales of the QLQ-C30 and other patient characteristics. Results A four component mixture model outperformed other models in terms of summary fit statistics. A close fit to the observed data was observed across the range of disease severity. Simulated data from the model closely aligned to the original data and showed that mapping did not significantly underestimate uncertainty. In the simulated data, 22.15% were equal to 1 compared to 21.93% in the original data. Variance was 0.0628 in the simulated data versus 0.0693 in the original data. The preferred mapping is provided in Excel and Stata files for the ease of users. Conclusion A four component adjusted mixture model provides reliable, non-biased estimates of EQ-5D-3L from the QLQ-C30, to link clinical studies to economic evaluation of health technologies for breast cancer. This work adds to a growing body of literature demonstrating the appropriateness of mixture model based approaches in mapping.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08964-5QLQ-C30EQ-5D-3LUtility mappingMixture modelsALDVMM
spellingShingle Laura A. Gray
Monica Hernandez Alava
Allan J. Wailoo
Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer
BMC Cancer
QLQ-C30
EQ-5D-3L
Utility mapping
Mixture models
ALDVMM
title Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer
title_full Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer
title_fullStr Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer
title_short Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer
title_sort mapping the eortc qlq c30 to eq 5d 3l in patients with breast cancer
topic QLQ-C30
EQ-5D-3L
Utility mapping
Mixture models
ALDVMM
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08964-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraagray mappingtheeortcqlqc30toeq5d3linpatientswithbreastcancer
AT monicahernandezalava mappingtheeortcqlqc30toeq5d3linpatientswithbreastcancer
AT allanjwailoo mappingtheeortcqlqc30toeq5d3linpatientswithbreastcancer