Canal to diaphysis ratio as a risk factor for hip fractures and hip fracture pattern

Introduction: Osteoporosis and related fractures constitute a significant burden on modern healthcare. The standard method of diagnosing osteoporosis with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan is limited by accessibility and expense. The thickness of the cortex of the proximal femur on plain...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ellanti Prasad, Mohan Kunal, Moriarity Andrew, Hogan Niall, McCarthy Tom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-01-01
Series:SICOT-J
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017051
_version_ 1818420612351131648
author Ellanti Prasad
Mohan Kunal
Moriarity Andrew
Hogan Niall
McCarthy Tom
author_facet Ellanti Prasad
Mohan Kunal
Moriarity Andrew
Hogan Niall
McCarthy Tom
author_sort Ellanti Prasad
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Osteoporosis and related fractures constitute a significant burden on modern healthcare. The standard method of diagnosing osteoporosis with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan is limited by accessibility and expense. The thickness of the cortex of the proximal femur on plain radiographs has been suggested to be a method for indicating osteoporosis and as a risk factor of hip fractures in the elderly. Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken to assess the usefulness of the canal-diaphysis ratio (CDR) as a risk factor for developing a hip fracture, excluding patients presenting under 50 years old, following high-energy trauma or pathological fractures. The CDR was measured in 84 neck of femur (NOF) fracture patients and 84 intertrochanteric hip fracture patients, and these were subsequently compared to the CDR of 84 patients without a hip fracture. Measurements were taken on two occasions by two members of the orthopaedic team, so as to assess the test’s inter- and intraobserver reliability. Results: In comparison to those without a fracture, there was a significant difference in the CDR of patients with a NOF fracture (P < 0.0001) and intertrochanteric fracture (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the odds of having a CDR above 60.67 and 64.41 were significantly higher in the NOF (OR = 2.214, P = 0.0129) and intertrochanteric fracture (OR = 32.27, P < 0.0001) groups respectively, when compared to the non-fractured group. The analysis of the test’s inter- and intraobserver reliability showed strong levels of reproducibility. Discussion: We concluded that a raised CDR was associated with an increased incidence of NOF and intertrochanteric hip fracture. Measuring the CDR can thus be considered as a reproducible and inexpensive method of identifying elderly patients at risk of hip fractures.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T12:57:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-452700446ab742908a3095292fcab2ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2426-8887
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T12:57:14Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series SICOT-J
spelling doaj.art-452700446ab742908a3095292fcab2ef2022-12-21T23:00:32ZengEDP SciencesSICOT-J2426-88872017-01-0136410.1051/sicotj/2017051sicotj170089Canal to diaphysis ratio as a risk factor for hip fractures and hip fracture patternEllanti PrasadMohan KunalMoriarity AndrewHogan NiallMcCarthy TomIntroduction: Osteoporosis and related fractures constitute a significant burden on modern healthcare. The standard method of diagnosing osteoporosis with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan is limited by accessibility and expense. The thickness of the cortex of the proximal femur on plain radiographs has been suggested to be a method for indicating osteoporosis and as a risk factor of hip fractures in the elderly. Methods: A retrospective study was undertaken to assess the usefulness of the canal-diaphysis ratio (CDR) as a risk factor for developing a hip fracture, excluding patients presenting under 50 years old, following high-energy trauma or pathological fractures. The CDR was measured in 84 neck of femur (NOF) fracture patients and 84 intertrochanteric hip fracture patients, and these were subsequently compared to the CDR of 84 patients without a hip fracture. Measurements were taken on two occasions by two members of the orthopaedic team, so as to assess the test’s inter- and intraobserver reliability. Results: In comparison to those without a fracture, there was a significant difference in the CDR of patients with a NOF fracture (P < 0.0001) and intertrochanteric fracture (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the odds of having a CDR above 60.67 and 64.41 were significantly higher in the NOF (OR = 2.214, P = 0.0129) and intertrochanteric fracture (OR = 32.27, P < 0.0001) groups respectively, when compared to the non-fractured group. The analysis of the test’s inter- and intraobserver reliability showed strong levels of reproducibility. Discussion: We concluded that a raised CDR was associated with an increased incidence of NOF and intertrochanteric hip fracture. Measuring the CDR can thus be considered as a reproducible and inexpensive method of identifying elderly patients at risk of hip fractures.https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017051Canal-diaphysis ratioOsteoporosisHip fractures
spellingShingle Ellanti Prasad
Mohan Kunal
Moriarity Andrew
Hogan Niall
McCarthy Tom
Canal to diaphysis ratio as a risk factor for hip fractures and hip fracture pattern
SICOT-J
Canal-diaphysis ratio
Osteoporosis
Hip fractures
title Canal to diaphysis ratio as a risk factor for hip fractures and hip fracture pattern
title_full Canal to diaphysis ratio as a risk factor for hip fractures and hip fracture pattern
title_fullStr Canal to diaphysis ratio as a risk factor for hip fractures and hip fracture pattern
title_full_unstemmed Canal to diaphysis ratio as a risk factor for hip fractures and hip fracture pattern
title_short Canal to diaphysis ratio as a risk factor for hip fractures and hip fracture pattern
title_sort canal to diaphysis ratio as a risk factor for hip fractures and hip fracture pattern
topic Canal-diaphysis ratio
Osteoporosis
Hip fractures
url https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2017051
work_keys_str_mv AT ellantiprasad canaltodiaphysisratioasariskfactorforhipfracturesandhipfracturepattern
AT mohankunal canaltodiaphysisratioasariskfactorforhipfracturesandhipfracturepattern
AT moriarityandrew canaltodiaphysisratioasariskfactorforhipfracturesandhipfracturepattern
AT hoganniall canaltodiaphysisratioasariskfactorforhipfracturesandhipfracturepattern
AT mccarthytom canaltodiaphysisratioasariskfactorforhipfracturesandhipfracturepattern