Effects of Axial Relative Ground Movement on Small Diameter Polyethylene Piping in Loose Sand

Small diameter (42 mm) medium density polyethylene (MDPE) pipes are widely used in the gas distribution system in Canada and other countries. They are sometimes exposed to ground movements resulting from landslides or earthquakes. The current design guidelines for evaluating the pipes subjected to g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Auchib Reza, Ashutosh Sutra Dhar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Infrastructures
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/6/12/168
_version_ 1797503635437912064
author Auchib Reza
Ashutosh Sutra Dhar
author_facet Auchib Reza
Ashutosh Sutra Dhar
author_sort Auchib Reza
collection DOAJ
description Small diameter (42 mm) medium density polyethylene (MDPE) pipes are widely used in the gas distribution system in Canada and other countries. They are sometimes exposed to ground movements resulting from landslides or earthquakes. The current design guidelines for evaluating the pipes subjected to ground movement were developed for steel pipes of larger diameters and may not apply to flexible MDPE pipes. This paper evaluates 42 mm diameter MDPE pipes buried in loose sand under axial relative ground movement for developing a design method for the pipes. MDPE is a viscoelastic material; therefore, the behaviour of MDPE pipes exposed to landslides would depend on the rate of ground movements. In this research, full-scale laboratory tests were conducted to investigate the responses of buried pipes under various rates of relative axial displacement. Finite element modelling of the tests was used to interpret the observed behaviour using the continuum mechanics framework. The study revealed that the pulling force on the pipe depends on the rate of relative ground displacement (pulling rate). The nondimensional pulling force possessed a nonlinear relationship with the pulling rate. A rate-dependent interface friction angle could be used to calculate the maximum pulling forces using the conventional design guidelines for the pipes in loose sand. Based on the pulling force, the pipe wall strains can be estimated using the methods available for larger diameter pipes.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:53:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4533fb71899a48dba3f36347af6d273e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2412-3811
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:53:31Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Infrastructures
spelling doaj.art-4533fb71899a48dba3f36347af6d273e2023-11-23T08:51:52ZengMDPI AGInfrastructures2412-38112021-12-0161216810.3390/infrastructures6120168Effects of Axial Relative Ground Movement on Small Diameter Polyethylene Piping in Loose SandAuchib Reza0Ashutosh Sutra Dhar1Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1C 5S7, CanadaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1C 5S7, CanadaSmall diameter (42 mm) medium density polyethylene (MDPE) pipes are widely used in the gas distribution system in Canada and other countries. They are sometimes exposed to ground movements resulting from landslides or earthquakes. The current design guidelines for evaluating the pipes subjected to ground movement were developed for steel pipes of larger diameters and may not apply to flexible MDPE pipes. This paper evaluates 42 mm diameter MDPE pipes buried in loose sand under axial relative ground movement for developing a design method for the pipes. MDPE is a viscoelastic material; therefore, the behaviour of MDPE pipes exposed to landslides would depend on the rate of ground movements. In this research, full-scale laboratory tests were conducted to investigate the responses of buried pipes under various rates of relative axial displacement. Finite element modelling of the tests was used to interpret the observed behaviour using the continuum mechanics framework. The study revealed that the pulling force on the pipe depends on the rate of relative ground displacement (pulling rate). The nondimensional pulling force possessed a nonlinear relationship with the pulling rate. A rate-dependent interface friction angle could be used to calculate the maximum pulling forces using the conventional design guidelines for the pipes in loose sand. Based on the pulling force, the pipe wall strains can be estimated using the methods available for larger diameter pipes.https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/6/12/168gas distribution pipesmall diameter pipemedium-density polyethylenefull-scale teststrain calculation model
spellingShingle Auchib Reza
Ashutosh Sutra Dhar
Effects of Axial Relative Ground Movement on Small Diameter Polyethylene Piping in Loose Sand
Infrastructures
gas distribution pipe
small diameter pipe
medium-density polyethylene
full-scale test
strain calculation model
title Effects of Axial Relative Ground Movement on Small Diameter Polyethylene Piping in Loose Sand
title_full Effects of Axial Relative Ground Movement on Small Diameter Polyethylene Piping in Loose Sand
title_fullStr Effects of Axial Relative Ground Movement on Small Diameter Polyethylene Piping in Loose Sand
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Axial Relative Ground Movement on Small Diameter Polyethylene Piping in Loose Sand
title_short Effects of Axial Relative Ground Movement on Small Diameter Polyethylene Piping in Loose Sand
title_sort effects of axial relative ground movement on small diameter polyethylene piping in loose sand
topic gas distribution pipe
small diameter pipe
medium-density polyethylene
full-scale test
strain calculation model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/6/12/168
work_keys_str_mv AT auchibreza effectsofaxialrelativegroundmovementonsmalldiameterpolyethylenepipinginloosesand
AT ashutoshsutradhar effectsofaxialrelativegroundmovementonsmalldiameterpolyethylenepipinginloosesand