Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review

Objectives: Multi-institutional research increases the generalizability of research findings. However, little is known about characteristics of collaborations across institutions in health sciences education research. Using a systematic review process, the authors describe characteristics of publish...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jocelyn Huang Schiller, Gary L. Beck Dallaghan, Terry Kind, Heather McLauchlan, Joseph Gigante, Sherilyn Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2017-10-01
Series:Journal of the Medical Library Association
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/134
_version_ 1818024557453246464
author Jocelyn Huang Schiller
Gary L. Beck Dallaghan
Terry Kind
Heather McLauchlan
Joseph Gigante
Sherilyn Smith
author_facet Jocelyn Huang Schiller
Gary L. Beck Dallaghan
Terry Kind
Heather McLauchlan
Joseph Gigante
Sherilyn Smith
author_sort Jocelyn Huang Schiller
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: Multi-institutional research increases the generalizability of research findings. However, little is known about characteristics of collaborations across institutions in health sciences education research. Using a systematic review process, the authors describe characteristics of published, peer-reviewed multi-institutional health sciences education research to inform educators who are considering such projects. Methods: Two medical librarians searched MEDLINE, the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for English-language studies published between 2004 and 2013 using keyword terms related to multi-institutional systems and health sciences education. Teams of two authors reviewed each study and resolved coding discrepancies through consensus. Collected data points included funding, research network involvement, author characteristics, learner characteristics, and research methods. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: One hundred eighteen of 310 articles met inclusion criteria. Sixty-three (53%) studies received external and/or internal financial support (87% listed external funding, 37% listed internal funding). Forty-five funded studies involved graduate medical education programs. Twenty (17%) studies involved a research or education network. Eighty-five (89%) publications listed an author with a master’s degree or doctoral degree. Ninety-two (78%) studies were descriptive, whereas 26 studies (22%) were experimental. The reported study outcomes were changes in student attitude (38%; n=44), knowledge (26%; n=31), or skill assessment (23%; n=27), as well as patient outcomes (9%; n=11). Conclusions: Multi-institutional descriptive studies reporting knowledge or attitude outcomes are highly published. Our findings indicate that funding resources are not essential to successfully undertake multi-institutional projects. Funded studies were more likely to originate from graduate medical or nursing programs.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T04:02:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-453482efe2ea4b5d9b9de14714ecbb68
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1536-5050
1558-9439
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T04:02:07Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
record_format Article
series Journal of the Medical Library Association
spelling doaj.art-453482efe2ea4b5d9b9de14714ecbb682022-12-22T02:02:57ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of the Medical Library Association1536-50501558-94392017-10-01105410.5195/jmla.2017.134164Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic reviewJocelyn Huang Schiller0Gary L. Beck Dallaghan1Terry Kind2Heather McLauchlan3Joseph Gigante4Sherilyn Smith5Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI(corresponding author), Assistant Dean for Medical Education, University of Nebraska College of Medicine, Omaha, NEAssociate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s National and George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DCAssociate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, ILAssociate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TNProfessor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WAObjectives: Multi-institutional research increases the generalizability of research findings. However, little is known about characteristics of collaborations across institutions in health sciences education research. Using a systematic review process, the authors describe characteristics of published, peer-reviewed multi-institutional health sciences education research to inform educators who are considering such projects. Methods: Two medical librarians searched MEDLINE, the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for English-language studies published between 2004 and 2013 using keyword terms related to multi-institutional systems and health sciences education. Teams of two authors reviewed each study and resolved coding discrepancies through consensus. Collected data points included funding, research network involvement, author characteristics, learner characteristics, and research methods. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: One hundred eighteen of 310 articles met inclusion criteria. Sixty-three (53%) studies received external and/or internal financial support (87% listed external funding, 37% listed internal funding). Forty-five funded studies involved graduate medical education programs. Twenty (17%) studies involved a research or education network. Eighty-five (89%) publications listed an author with a master’s degree or doctoral degree. Ninety-two (78%) studies were descriptive, whereas 26 studies (22%) were experimental. The reported study outcomes were changes in student attitude (38%; n=44), knowledge (26%; n=31), or skill assessment (23%; n=27), as well as patient outcomes (9%; n=11). Conclusions: Multi-institutional descriptive studies reporting knowledge or attitude outcomes are highly published. Our findings indicate that funding resources are not essential to successfully undertake multi-institutional projects. Funded studies were more likely to originate from graduate medical or nursing programs.http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/134Systematic ReviewMulti-Institutional ResearchFunding
spellingShingle Jocelyn Huang Schiller
Gary L. Beck Dallaghan
Terry Kind
Heather McLauchlan
Joseph Gigante
Sherilyn Smith
Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
Journal of the Medical Library Association
Systematic Review
Multi-Institutional Research
Funding
title Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
title_full Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
title_fullStr Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
title_short Characteristics of multi-institutional health sciences education research: a systematic review
title_sort characteristics of multi institutional health sciences education research a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
Multi-Institutional Research
Funding
url http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/134
work_keys_str_mv AT jocelynhuangschiller characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview
AT garylbeckdallaghan characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview
AT terrykind characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview
AT heathermclauchlan characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview
AT josephgigante characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview
AT sherilynsmith characteristicsofmultiinstitutionalhealthscienceseducationresearchasystematicreview