Evaluation of Microscopy, Adenosine Deaminase and Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels as Diagnostic Methods of Tubercular Pleural Effusion

Introduction: Pleural effusion has been associated with over 50 aetiologies, amongst which Tuberculous Pleural Effusion (TPE) is one of the most prevalent infection. TPE is highly infectious and easily transmitted. Pleural biopsy is currently, the most accepted diagnostic criteria. However, the proc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Larika Kumar, Dakshayani Pandit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd. 2020-10-01
Series:National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.njlm.net/articles/PDF/2425/44538_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PFA(SHU)_PB(AG_SHU)_PN(SHU)_PF2(AvG_OM).pdf
_version_ 1819236517019648000
author Larika Kumar
Dakshayani Pandit
author_facet Larika Kumar
Dakshayani Pandit
author_sort Larika Kumar
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Pleural effusion has been associated with over 50 aetiologies, amongst which Tuberculous Pleural Effusion (TPE) is one of the most prevalent infection. TPE is highly infectious and easily transmitted. Pleural biopsy is currently, the most accepted diagnostic criteria. However, the procedure is invasive, tedious and time-consuming. Aim: To bring about a better understanding of Adenosine Deaminase (ADA), Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels (LDH), LDH: ADA ratio and microscopy as screening and diagnostic methods of TPE. Materials and Methods: The research was a hospital-based observational study which analysed 50 cases of pleural effusion. After obtaining informed consent, Pleural Fluid (PF) was collected and ADA and LDH levels were analysed. ZiehlNeelsen (ZN) staining of PF was performed and pleural biopsy was obtained. Using appropriate statistical analytical tools, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were prepared to find the ideal cut-off point for each diagnostic criterion. The sensitivity, specificity and Area Under Curve (AUC) for each parameter were compared. Results: In this study, 76% were males and 24% were females with a mean age of 41 years. Pleural biopsy was used as the gold standard for the positive tuberculosis case. Of the 50 cases analysed, 31 cases (62%) were reported with a positive biopsy report for TPE, while 19 (38%) presented a negative biopsy report. At a cut-off level of 26 IU/L, pleural ADA level reported sensitivity and specificity of 96.77% and 57.89%, respectively, while that of LDH was 93.55% and 68.42%, respectively at a cut-off of 326 IU/L. The LDH: ADA ratio was found to be most significant at 6.64 with a sensitivity of 93.55% and a specificity of 36.84%. The demonstration of AFB in ZN staining had 100% specificity but a mere 9.68% sensitivity. Conclusion: According to the present study, ADA had maximum sensitivity and thus, is the most suitable screening criterion for suspected cases of TPE, followed by LDH and LDH:ADA ratio, while ZN staining has maximum specificity, amongst the various parameters evaluated.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T13:05:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4540cfd8783e4562a6a3d20115fbc166
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2277-8551
2455-6882
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T13:05:41Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.
record_format Article
series National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
spelling doaj.art-4540cfd8783e4562a6a3d20115fbc1662022-12-21T17:45:54ZengJCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.National Journal of Laboratory Medicine2277-85512455-68822020-10-0194131810.7860/NJLM/2020/44538:2425Evaluation of Microscopy, Adenosine Deaminase and Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels as Diagnostic Methods of Tubercular Pleural EffusionLarika Kumar0Dakshayani Pandit1MBBS Student, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, IndiaProfessor, Department of Microbiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.Introduction: Pleural effusion has been associated with over 50 aetiologies, amongst which Tuberculous Pleural Effusion (TPE) is one of the most prevalent infection. TPE is highly infectious and easily transmitted. Pleural biopsy is currently, the most accepted diagnostic criteria. However, the procedure is invasive, tedious and time-consuming. Aim: To bring about a better understanding of Adenosine Deaminase (ADA), Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels (LDH), LDH: ADA ratio and microscopy as screening and diagnostic methods of TPE. Materials and Methods: The research was a hospital-based observational study which analysed 50 cases of pleural effusion. After obtaining informed consent, Pleural Fluid (PF) was collected and ADA and LDH levels were analysed. ZiehlNeelsen (ZN) staining of PF was performed and pleural biopsy was obtained. Using appropriate statistical analytical tools, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were prepared to find the ideal cut-off point for each diagnostic criterion. The sensitivity, specificity and Area Under Curve (AUC) for each parameter were compared. Results: In this study, 76% were males and 24% were females with a mean age of 41 years. Pleural biopsy was used as the gold standard for the positive tuberculosis case. Of the 50 cases analysed, 31 cases (62%) were reported with a positive biopsy report for TPE, while 19 (38%) presented a negative biopsy report. At a cut-off level of 26 IU/L, pleural ADA level reported sensitivity and specificity of 96.77% and 57.89%, respectively, while that of LDH was 93.55% and 68.42%, respectively at a cut-off of 326 IU/L. The LDH: ADA ratio was found to be most significant at 6.64 with a sensitivity of 93.55% and a specificity of 36.84%. The demonstration of AFB in ZN staining had 100% specificity but a mere 9.68% sensitivity. Conclusion: According to the present study, ADA had maximum sensitivity and thus, is the most suitable screening criterion for suspected cases of TPE, followed by LDH and LDH:ADA ratio, while ZN staining has maximum specificity, amongst the various parameters evaluated.http://www.njlm.net/articles/PDF/2425/44538_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PFA(SHU)_PB(AG_SHU)_PN(SHU)_PF2(AvG_OM).pdfpleural biopsysensitivityspecificitytuberculosis screeningziehl neelsen staining
spellingShingle Larika Kumar
Dakshayani Pandit
Evaluation of Microscopy, Adenosine Deaminase and Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels as Diagnostic Methods of Tubercular Pleural Effusion
National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
pleural biopsy
sensitivity
specificity
tuberculosis screening
ziehl neelsen staining
title Evaluation of Microscopy, Adenosine Deaminase and Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels as Diagnostic Methods of Tubercular Pleural Effusion
title_full Evaluation of Microscopy, Adenosine Deaminase and Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels as Diagnostic Methods of Tubercular Pleural Effusion
title_fullStr Evaluation of Microscopy, Adenosine Deaminase and Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels as Diagnostic Methods of Tubercular Pleural Effusion
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Microscopy, Adenosine Deaminase and Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels as Diagnostic Methods of Tubercular Pleural Effusion
title_short Evaluation of Microscopy, Adenosine Deaminase and Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels as Diagnostic Methods of Tubercular Pleural Effusion
title_sort evaluation of microscopy adenosine deaminase and lactate dehydrogenase levels as diagnostic methods of tubercular pleural effusion
topic pleural biopsy
sensitivity
specificity
tuberculosis screening
ziehl neelsen staining
url http://www.njlm.net/articles/PDF/2425/44538_CE[Ra1]_F(SHU)_PF1(AG_SHU)_PFA(SHU)_PB(AG_SHU)_PN(SHU)_PF2(AvG_OM).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT larikakumar evaluationofmicroscopyadenosinedeaminaseandlactatedehydrogenaselevelsasdiagnosticmethodsoftubercularpleuraleffusion
AT dakshayanipandit evaluationofmicroscopyadenosinedeaminaseandlactatedehydrogenaselevelsasdiagnosticmethodsoftubercularpleuraleffusion