TARİHİN ÇAĞLARA AYRILMASINDA “ÜÇLÜ SİSTEM” ve TÜRK-İSLÂM TARİHİ’NİN ÇAĞ TAKSİMİ MESELESİ
German Scholar Cellarius, in periodization of history grounded on Christian “trinity” based system, secularized this system and reached a final level. After him, Triple Periodic System became a de facto rule and used until today. Periodization of European originated history also directly affected wo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ahmet Simsek
2014-10-01
|
Series: | Turkish History Education Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.tuhed.org/article/view/5000071435 |
_version_ | 1827829635550806016 |
---|---|
author | Necmettin Alkan |
author_facet | Necmettin Alkan |
author_sort | Necmettin Alkan |
collection | DOAJ |
description | German Scholar Cellarius, in periodization of history grounded on Christian “trinity” based system, secularized this system and reached a final level. After him, Triple Periodic System became a de facto rule and used until today. Periodization of European originated history also directly affected world and Turkish historiography and determined it. Beginning from Ottoman period the duration till today, historical events have been determined and their periodization done in accordance with this system. Turkish-Islamic History, being pretty rich content and past, with the rules of this system is put into molding of “Old Age”, “Middle Age”, New and Modern Age” and analyzed in the rules of this system. Both academic and popular history studies are wholly made of in accordance with this system. * Prof. Dr., Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü. E-posta: necmettinalkan@gmail.com Actually it is a wrongdoing attaching and analyzing World, Islamic and Turkish history is accordance with this triple system. In this triple system, Islamic and Turkish history are “deactivated” and “de-historicized”. Though its these important negative effects Turkish historians have not arranged a serious criticism on this system and they did not produce an alternative historical periodization. This issue should be discussed and a new historical aging system should be developed. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T04:07:45Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-454479f715724c31a41ed261e3b62946 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2147-4516 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T04:07:45Z |
publishDate | 2014-10-01 |
publisher | Ahmet Simsek |
record_format | Article |
series | Turkish History Education Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-454479f715724c31a41ed261e3b629462023-09-03T11:12:11ZengAhmet SimsekTurkish History Education Journal2147-45162014-10-0132436410.17497/tuhed.257335000067495TARİHİN ÇAĞLARA AYRILMASINDA “ÜÇLÜ SİSTEM” ve TÜRK-İSLÂM TARİHİ’NİN ÇAĞ TAKSİMİ MESELESİNecmettin Alkan0Karadeniz Teknik ÜniversitesiGerman Scholar Cellarius, in periodization of history grounded on Christian “trinity” based system, secularized this system and reached a final level. After him, Triple Periodic System became a de facto rule and used until today. Periodization of European originated history also directly affected world and Turkish historiography and determined it. Beginning from Ottoman period the duration till today, historical events have been determined and their periodization done in accordance with this system. Turkish-Islamic History, being pretty rich content and past, with the rules of this system is put into molding of “Old Age”, “Middle Age”, New and Modern Age” and analyzed in the rules of this system. Both academic and popular history studies are wholly made of in accordance with this system. * Prof. Dr., Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü. E-posta: necmettinalkan@gmail.com Actually it is a wrongdoing attaching and analyzing World, Islamic and Turkish history is accordance with this triple system. In this triple system, Islamic and Turkish history are “deactivated” and “de-historicized”. Though its these important negative effects Turkish historians have not arranged a serious criticism on this system and they did not produce an alternative historical periodization. This issue should be discussed and a new historical aging system should be developed.http://www.tuhed.org/article/view/5000071435İslâm Tarihi, Türk Tarihi, Avrupa Merkezcilik, Çağlara Ayırma, Üçlü Sistem, Orta Çağ, Yeni Çağ, Yakın Çağ |
spellingShingle | Necmettin Alkan TARİHİN ÇAĞLARA AYRILMASINDA “ÜÇLÜ SİSTEM” ve TÜRK-İSLÂM TARİHİ’NİN ÇAĞ TAKSİMİ MESELESİ Turkish History Education Journal İslâm Tarihi, Türk Tarihi, Avrupa Merkezcilik, Çağlara Ayırma, Üçlü Sistem, Orta Çağ, Yeni Çağ, Yakın Çağ |
title | TARİHİN ÇAĞLARA AYRILMASINDA “ÜÇLÜ SİSTEM” ve TÜRK-İSLÂM TARİHİ’NİN ÇAĞ TAKSİMİ MESELESİ |
title_full | TARİHİN ÇAĞLARA AYRILMASINDA “ÜÇLÜ SİSTEM” ve TÜRK-İSLÂM TARİHİ’NİN ÇAĞ TAKSİMİ MESELESİ |
title_fullStr | TARİHİN ÇAĞLARA AYRILMASINDA “ÜÇLÜ SİSTEM” ve TÜRK-İSLÂM TARİHİ’NİN ÇAĞ TAKSİMİ MESELESİ |
title_full_unstemmed | TARİHİN ÇAĞLARA AYRILMASINDA “ÜÇLÜ SİSTEM” ve TÜRK-İSLÂM TARİHİ’NİN ÇAĞ TAKSİMİ MESELESİ |
title_short | TARİHİN ÇAĞLARA AYRILMASINDA “ÜÇLÜ SİSTEM” ve TÜRK-İSLÂM TARİHİ’NİN ÇAĞ TAKSİMİ MESELESİ |
title_sort | tarihin caglara ayrilmasinda uclu sistem ve turk islam tarihi nin cag taksimi meselesi |
topic | İslâm Tarihi, Türk Tarihi, Avrupa Merkezcilik, Çağlara Ayırma, Üçlü Sistem, Orta Çağ, Yeni Çağ, Yakın Çağ |
url | http://www.tuhed.org/article/view/5000071435 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT necmettinalkan tarihincaglaraayrilmasindauclusistemveturkislamtarihinincagtaksimimeselesi |