CD 56 staining in liver biopsies does not help in differentiating extrahepatic biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Several conditions are considered in differential diagnosis of neonatal cholestasis. Of these the most important is extrahepatic biliary atresia (EHBA), while prompt diagnosis and surgical correction of obstruction can ameliorate c...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2008-03-01
|
| Series: | Diagnostic Pathology |
| Online Access: | http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/3/1/10 |
| _version_ | 1818566579694075904 |
|---|---|
| author | Irvanloo Guiti Sani Mehri Khairkhah Reza Mahjoub Fatemeh E Monajemzadeh Maryam |
| author_facet | Irvanloo Guiti Sani Mehri Khairkhah Reza Mahjoub Fatemeh E Monajemzadeh Maryam |
| author_sort | Irvanloo Guiti |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Several conditions are considered in differential diagnosis of neonatal cholestasis. Of these the most important is extrahepatic biliary atresia (EHBA), while prompt diagnosis and surgical correction of obstruction can ameliorate clinical symptoms, provides long term survival for about one fourth of patients and serves as an important bridge to transplantation for many others. From histopathologic standpoint, features of EHBA overlaps with other diagnoses and so ancillary tests such as immunohistochemical staining for CD56 is suggested by some authors as a helpful tool in differential diagnosis.</p> <p>Hereby we wanted to examine this staining in our center which is a referral children hospital and to prove its efficacy in our problematic cases.</p> <p>Materials and Methods</p> <p>By retrospective review of pathology records during 2000 to 2006 in Markaze Tebbi Koodakan (children hospital related to Tehran University of Medical Sciences), we selected 17 cases of EHBA as patients and 12 cases with other diagnoses as controls, both with some degree of bile ductular proliferation in liver biopsies. EHBA cases were all proved by surgery. Four of control cases also underwent surgery but proved to have open ducts by intra-operative cholangiography. Long term follow up and other tests ruled out EHBA in other 8 cases. Hematoxylin-Eosin stains of paraffin blocks were studied again and freshly prepared sections were immunostained for CD56.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Bile ducts and proliferating bile ductules were strongly positive for CD56 in 6 of 17 cases of EHBA. In 7 out of 17, positivity were seen in more than two thirds of portal tracts. In controls, one case showed strong positivity and 6 out of twelve showed positivity in more than two thirds of portal tracts. The intensity and distribution of CD56 staining did not differ significantly between two groups.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Despite findings of previous studies, we have shown that CD56 staining can not help as an ancillary test in differential diagnosis of neonatal cholestasis and perhaps other markers should be tested in this regard.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T01:55:32Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-455252801e3e4d829a12f19ceccdc0cc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1746-1596 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T01:55:32Z |
| publishDate | 2008-03-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Diagnostic Pathology |
| spelling | doaj.art-455252801e3e4d829a12f19ceccdc0cc2022-12-21T23:21:13ZengBMCDiagnostic Pathology1746-15962008-03-01311010.1186/1746-1596-3-10CD 56 staining in liver biopsies does not help in differentiating extrahepatic biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasisIrvanloo GuitiSani MehriKhairkhah RezaMahjoub Fatemeh EMonajemzadeh Maryam<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Several conditions are considered in differential diagnosis of neonatal cholestasis. Of these the most important is extrahepatic biliary atresia (EHBA), while prompt diagnosis and surgical correction of obstruction can ameliorate clinical symptoms, provides long term survival for about one fourth of patients and serves as an important bridge to transplantation for many others. From histopathologic standpoint, features of EHBA overlaps with other diagnoses and so ancillary tests such as immunohistochemical staining for CD56 is suggested by some authors as a helpful tool in differential diagnosis.</p> <p>Hereby we wanted to examine this staining in our center which is a referral children hospital and to prove its efficacy in our problematic cases.</p> <p>Materials and Methods</p> <p>By retrospective review of pathology records during 2000 to 2006 in Markaze Tebbi Koodakan (children hospital related to Tehran University of Medical Sciences), we selected 17 cases of EHBA as patients and 12 cases with other diagnoses as controls, both with some degree of bile ductular proliferation in liver biopsies. EHBA cases were all proved by surgery. Four of control cases also underwent surgery but proved to have open ducts by intra-operative cholangiography. Long term follow up and other tests ruled out EHBA in other 8 cases. Hematoxylin-Eosin stains of paraffin blocks were studied again and freshly prepared sections were immunostained for CD56.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Bile ducts and proliferating bile ductules were strongly positive for CD56 in 6 of 17 cases of EHBA. In 7 out of 17, positivity were seen in more than two thirds of portal tracts. In controls, one case showed strong positivity and 6 out of twelve showed positivity in more than two thirds of portal tracts. The intensity and distribution of CD56 staining did not differ significantly between two groups.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Despite findings of previous studies, we have shown that CD56 staining can not help as an ancillary test in differential diagnosis of neonatal cholestasis and perhaps other markers should be tested in this regard.</p>http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/3/1/10 |
| spellingShingle | Irvanloo Guiti Sani Mehri Khairkhah Reza Mahjoub Fatemeh E Monajemzadeh Maryam CD 56 staining in liver biopsies does not help in differentiating extrahepatic biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis Diagnostic Pathology |
| title | CD 56 staining in liver biopsies does not help in differentiating extrahepatic biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis |
| title_full | CD 56 staining in liver biopsies does not help in differentiating extrahepatic biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis |
| title_fullStr | CD 56 staining in liver biopsies does not help in differentiating extrahepatic biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis |
| title_full_unstemmed | CD 56 staining in liver biopsies does not help in differentiating extrahepatic biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis |
| title_short | CD 56 staining in liver biopsies does not help in differentiating extrahepatic biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis |
| title_sort | cd 56 staining in liver biopsies does not help in differentiating extrahepatic biliary atresia from other causes of neonatal cholestasis |
| url | http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/3/1/10 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT irvanlooguiti cd56staininginliverbiopsiesdoesnothelpindifferentiatingextrahepaticbiliaryatresiafromothercausesofneonatalcholestasis AT sanimehri cd56staininginliverbiopsiesdoesnothelpindifferentiatingextrahepaticbiliaryatresiafromothercausesofneonatalcholestasis AT khairkhahreza cd56staininginliverbiopsiesdoesnothelpindifferentiatingextrahepaticbiliaryatresiafromothercausesofneonatalcholestasis AT mahjoubfatemehe cd56staininginliverbiopsiesdoesnothelpindifferentiatingextrahepaticbiliaryatresiafromothercausesofneonatalcholestasis AT monajemzadehmaryam cd56staininginliverbiopsiesdoesnothelpindifferentiatingextrahepaticbiliaryatresiafromothercausesofneonatalcholestasis |